Subscribe: Comments on: Content vs. Branding
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade A rated
Language: English
brand  branding content  branding  built  buy  content  don  information  iphone  product  successful branding  things  tires  words 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: Content vs. Branding

Comments on: Content vs. Branding direct marketing blog

Last Build Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 05:20:55 +0000


By: healthy living

Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:58:11 +0000

|I am often to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your site and keep checking for new information.}

By: Tim Gonazlez

Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:21:22 +0000

I seriously love your blog.. Excellent colors & theme. Did you develop this web site yourself? Please reply back as I’m wanting to create my very own website and would like to find out where you got this from or exactly what the theme is called. Thank you!

By: David Fideler

Fri, 03 Aug 2007 02:32:34 +0000

"Branding" and "content" are not necessarily two different things. The most effective branding is just an abbreviated version of content. Look at the iPhone. The actual selling points of the iPhone are embodied in its very design. You don't need a long explanation of why the iPhone is desirable, because the selling points are built into it. From a marketing perspective, nothing could be better! When you read about the iPhone, you are getting a more in-depth explanation of what is built into the brand. Branding and content can be two different expressions of the same thing, so I don't think it's a case of one being better. In the end, there is no brand without content -- so content is always primary, at least in that sense. David Fideler Concord Communications and Design

By: Lori

Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:36:10 +0000

I'm from the old school - words sell. Yes, branding works, but without words, whaddya got? I don't buy M&Ms because they added blue to their "menu" - I buy them because they promise to melt in my mouth, not in my hand. That and the fact that I like chocolate... I have to agree that branding requires more attention to copy than at first glance. Case in point - I was asked recently to review a new product being considered for the market. They were tired - scented tires. The copy was shmaltzy at best; "You demand the best perfume, ladies! Why not the best smelling tires?!" Uh, how about because I don't go around sniffing tires like a beagle with a full bladder? It was the case of a ridiculous product that was made worse by copy that insulted its intended audience. Why the hell would we women care if our tires emitted a lovely lavender scent? We want to know if the damn things are going to last! Sheesh.

By: Leslie McKerns

Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:09:39 +0000

Branding has become popular because it is seen as a higher level of commitment. (We will ALWAYS do thus and so--freshest, fastest, most compassionate, you name it.)But once you do name it - you had better deliver. Branding is ultimately about the customer experience. You create a set of expectations and then deliver on it. If you don’t, the brand is dead or dying, no matter how cute the logo. When a brand delivers on expectations it has created it becomes memorable and recognizable (because it has consistently delivered on those expectations). Here a few examples: Let's look at Ron Popeil's Ronco Company. What is he saying? He's saying: Come on live a little; have some fun with gadgets. And he gets that customer to be engaged--to buy into the experience as well as buy the product. His Showtime Rotisserie--Set it and Forget it. Set it and...what? And the audience roars...forget it!!! This is a far different experience than the sophistication and culinary seriousness of say, a Williams and Sonoma or a Sur La Table. They are saying, You can't possibly attempt to do this properly without this stainless steel masterpiece. And you believe it because the outcome matters to you--it is your boss or mother in law coming for a sit down dinner party or Thanksgiving. So, you think what is the outcome I want them to have? (with my product or service) and you deliver on that in everything you say or do--your newsletter, your catalog. Are we serious or are we fun? If you are BMW and branding yourself as the Ultimate Driving better have some sophisticated experientials to back that up--the showroom, the brochures, the well as a smooth driving performance vehicle. Or the first time I pull out in front of a truck on I-95 and I barely beat it--I'm going to be more than disappointed, I'm going to be returning it to the showroom.

By: Riel Langlois, writer of Canadian comic books

Sun, 01 Jul 2007 04:38:38 +0000

Right now, I think branding is more important. You're right about information overload - I tend to focus on brand names I trust rather than compare reviews of similar products.

By: Michael A. Stelzner

Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:00:16 +0000

I heard someone calling my name... Bob, I would have to agree that prospects are suffering from information overload... HOWEVER, that makes the job of copywriting ever MORE important. "Me too" writing will drown in the sea of excess. I think now what matter is relevance more than brand. It helps to be known, but in the BtoB world, often businesses buy from people/other businesses they have never heard of. AND, good content can actually help a business become a thought leader and improve branding. Thanks for pulling me in.

By: Bobby Lehew

Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:37:54 +0000

Both. It's not an either/or proposition, they are not mutually exclusive. I think Susan is right: establishing that expert reputation is another way of building your brand, both play a part in the process. Branding is intriguing; thought leadership is inviting.

By: Kevin Behringer

Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:45:23 +0000

Bob: Very interesting question. I don't think that strong content will ever go away as a preferred method of marketing. I think branding is critical, but often built BY strong content. To use Susan's example of the iPhone, yes it gets a lot of press from the fact that it's an Apple product...part of a strong brand. But, if it didn't do all of the things it does (in my mind...that's the content) would it get the same press. I doubt it. If it was simply a cell phone with Apple's name on it, it wouldn't do. I think there needs to be a strong connection between branding and content. In fact, brands are often built by the least the good ones. The days of hiding poor content with fancy branding are over (or should be!). Thank God!

By: Deborah Chaddock Brown

Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:34:59 +0000

Bob, I love branding messages. I laugh with the commercials that are fun and memorable. I chuckle over who is wearing the milk mustache. But when it comes to making a buying decision - the cute and clever messages based solely on branding don't give me the information I need to change my behavior or part with my money. I may think the caveman commercials for Geiko are memorable but would I switch insurance companies based on what I see in the commercials? No. And the words have to connect with me. I don't want to hear about quality, price and selection - frankly those are a given - the price of admittance. I want to know that you GET me, that you UNDERSTAND my pain, you CONNECT with my needs and you'll PROVIDE the solutions to make my life easier, better, safer, whatever. You aren't going to do that with a branding message alone. Not in my book. When I think successful branding image, I think Target. Seeing the red circle connects with my prior shopping experiences. I see the red circle and I remember a clean environment, helpful employees, nice selection, reasonable prices. I can't think of another company as successful with a branding message - bottom line - I need words. Deborah Chaddock Brown