Subscribe: LexisNexis® Mealey's™ California Section 17200 Legal News
http://www.lexisnexis.com/mealeys/rss/legalnews_californiasection17200.xml
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
calif dist  calif  california federal  california  claims  court  dist lexis  federal judge  federal  judge  lexis  unfair competition 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: LexisNexis® Mealey's™ California Section 17200 Legal News

LexisNexis® Mealey's™ California Section 17200 Legal News



Headline California Section 17200 Legal News from LexisNexis®



 



9th Circuit Finds Chase Falsely Promised Loan Modification To Borrower
LOS ANGELES - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 13 affirmed a district court's finding that a property owner asserted a viable claim for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) but reversed its rulings in favor of a bank on the property owner's claims for breach of contract and violation of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (Mahin Oskoui v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, et al., No. 15-55457, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365).



9th Circuit Finds Borrower Lacks Standing To Assert UCL Violation
PASADENA, Calif. - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 6 affirmed dismissal of a homeowner's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law and other California law, finding that there was no private right of action available to him under the law or that loan servicers acted unlawfully (Peter Zeppeiro v. Green Tree Servicing LLC, et al., No. 15-55747, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 3951).



Court Finds Borrowers Have No Standing To Challenge Foreclosure
SAN FRANCISCO - A California appellate panel on Feb. 17 affirmed a ruling in favor of various lenders, finding that property owners failed to show that they had standing to challenge a foreclosure under a pooling and services agreement (Hanneke C. Gary R. Lohse, v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, et al., No. A142814, Calif. App., 1st App., Div. 4, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub LEXIS 1210).



Judge Finds Claims Related To Patents Must Be Reviewed Under Korean Law
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California federal judge on Feb. 24 partially granted a motion filed by a former employee of a company that makes high-voltage power conversion systems to dismiss certain claims related to his alleged theft of proprietary information to obtain patents, finding that some of the claims should be adjudicated under Korean law (Power Integrations Inc. v. Chan-Woong Park, No. 16-cv-02367, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26467).



Judge Finds Employees Failed To Prove Theory Of Joint Liability
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on March 8 found that former employees, who sold skincare products for various entities, failed to show that a company was the alter ego of other defendants named in the case, granting the owner of the product's motion to dismiss claims for violation of California labor code and California's unfair competition law (UCL) (Candle Horton, et al. v. NeoStrata Company Inc., et al., No. 3:16-CV-02189, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34059).



Judge Finds Claims Against Former Employee Are Preempted By CUTSA
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that a company's claims related to a former employee's alleged theft of proprietary information for violation of California Penal Code Section 502 and for conversion were based on the same facts as its claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, a California federal judge on March 1 found that the claims were preempted by the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA) (Henry Schein Inc. v. Jennifer Cook, et al., No. 16-cv-03166, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29183).



Court Dismisses Employment Claims Related To Shared Tip-Pooling Policy
SAN DIEGO - After finding that a restaurant chain's shared tip-pooling policy is not unlawful, a California federal judge on Feb. 28 dismissed a former server's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and for penalties under the California's Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) (Brendan Wilkes v. Benihana Inc., et al., No. 16cv2219, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29127).



Judge Refuses To Strike Punitive Damages Claim Related To Ladder Collapse
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Feb. 21 refused to strike a claim for punitive damages asserted by the purchaser of an extension ladder who alleges that he fell and suffered serious injuries after it collapsed (William Evans v. Home Depot U.S.A. Inc., et al., No. 16-cv-07191, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24171).



4th Circuit Finds Gambling In Virtual Casino Was Not A Monetary Loss
RICHMOND, Va. - The Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on March 17 affirmed dismissal of a complaint filed by a player of a video game, finding that her claims for recovery of money spent in a virtual casino did not constitute money lost under Maryland's loss-recovery statute (Mia Mason v. Machine Zone Inc., No. 15-2469, 4th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4766).



Judge Partially Dismisses Claims On Retailer's Advertisements On Thread Count
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Feb. 28 refused to grant a retailer's motion to dismiss claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and for false advertising, but granted dismissal with leave to amend in relation to claims for products that he did not purchase (William Rushing v. Williams-Sonoma Inc., et al., No. 16-cv-01421, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28227).



Judge Orders BMW To Show Cause As To Why UCL Case Should Not Be Transferred
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Feb. 21 ordered a car manufacturer to show cause as to why its claims for violation of California's unfair competition law and trademark infringement should not be transferred to another venue (BMW of North America, LLC, et al. v. Michael Chambers, et al., No. 17-0846, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24096).



Judge Remands Class Action Filed Against Ford To California Court
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on March 10 remanded a class action lawsuit filed by product specialists who assert wage-related claims against a car maker and staffing companies, finding that the amount in controversy did not meet federal jurisdictional requirements (Henry Chen, et al. v. United Talent Agency LLC, et al., No. 17-1848, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34960).



Judge Refuses To Substitute Plaintiff In Insurance Coverage Dispute
FRESNO, Calif. - A California federal judge on March 16 denied an insured's petition to substitute her as the plaintiff in an action in which her husband sought coverage for theft under an insurance policy, finding that she failed to submit sufficient medical evidence to support a finding that he was incompetent to proceed as a plaintiff (Ray Gibson v. Hagerty Insurance Agency, et al., No. 1:16-cv-00677, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38231).



Federal Judge Denies Class Certification For Class Of Truck Drivers
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on March 3 denied a former truck driver's request to certify a class of truck drivers in relation to an alleged failure to pay a minimum wage for the hours worked, finding that he failed to meet the federal pleading requirements (Robert Gatdula, et al. v. CRST International Inc., et al., No. 11-1285, C.D. Calif., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184720).



Craft Brew Alliance Accused Of Making Kona Beer On The Mainland
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Craft Brew Alliance Inc. has deceived and overcharged consumers by falsely advertising its Kona Brewing Co. brand as a local beer made in Hawaii, but it's actually made in the continental United States, two California women allege in a class complaint filed Feb. 28 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sara Cilloni, et al. v. Craft Brew Alliance, Inc., et al., No. 17-1027, N.D. Calif.).



Amendment Permitted, Class Certification Considered In Honda Window Defect Suit
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on March 10 denied a motion for summary judgment filed by American Honda Motor Co. Inc. in a proposed class complaint accusing the car maker of selling certain models with defective windows and granted the plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint to substitute the named plaintiff to represent a narrowed proposed class (Phyllis Grodzitsky, et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., No. 12-1142, C.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185019).



Uber Sued For Trade Secret, Patent Violations In California Federal Court
SAN FRANCISCO - Waymo LLC - a Google Inc. division devoted to the development of self-driving cars - accused Uber Technologies Inc. of "calculated theft" in a patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Feb. 23 (Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc., et al., No. 17-939, N.D. Calif.).



Judge Preliminarily OKs $22.5 Million Settlement Of Google AdWords Class Action
SAN JOSE, Calif. - Preliminary approval of a $22.5 million settlement of a class action over Google Inc.'s AdWords program under California's unfair competition law (UCL) and false advertising law (FAL) was granted March 9, with a California federal judge approving a proposed settlement class and settlement fund and setting dates for class notification and a fairness hearing (In Re Google AdWords Litigation, No. 5:08-cv-03369, N.D. Calif.).



Judge: MDL Court Can Rule On Jurisdictional Issues In Volkswagen Emissions Suit
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A federal judge in California on March 7 stayed a consumer's lawsuit over the installation of defeat devices in some of Volkswagen Group of America Inc.'s diesel vehicles pending transfer to a multidistrict litigation court, finding that the MDL court can determine if jurisdictional issues warrant remanding the action to state court (Pamela Woodcox, et al. v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., d/b/a Volkswagen of America, Inc., et al., No. 17-215 WBS DB, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32609).



9th Circuit Finds Member Of Gym Consented To Receiving Text Messages
PASADENA, Calif. - After finding that a member of a gym expressly consented to receiving text messages and that he lacked standing to assert violations of California business and professions codes, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 30 affirmed a summary judgment ruling for the owners of the gym and its marketing firm (Bradley Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness Group LLC, et al., No. 14-55980, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1591).



Judge Dismisses UCL Claims Against Costco And Producer Of Prawns
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Jan. 24 dismissed proposed class action claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims, finding that a consumer failed to show that she purchased prawns from a retailer that were provided by two food product companies that produced the prawns using illegal labor practices (Monica Sud, et al. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al., No. 15-cv-03783, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9943).



Federal Judge Finds Tenants Lack Standing To Sue Real Estate Trust
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A California federal judge on Jan. 20 dismissed class action claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), negligence and other causes of action related to a data breach of a real estate trust's computer system, finding that former tenants of the trust's property failed to show that they had standing to sue (Mark Foster, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Essex Property Inc., No. .5:14-cv-05531, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8373).



Judge Refuses To Dismiss Claims Arising From Diminished Timeshare Values
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - After finding that the owners of interests in timeshare units at Lake Tahoe pleaded sufficient facts to support their claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims in relation to a diminished value in the properties, a California federal judge on Feb. 13 denied a motion filed by the owners and managers of the complex to dismiss the case (Thomas F. Reiser Jr., et al. v. Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation, No. 2:16-cv-00237, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20127).



Federal Judge Remands Company's UCL Claims Related To Trademark
OAKLAND, Calif. - A California federal judge on Feb. 10 granted an exclusive licensee's motion to remand its claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other claims related to the alleged unauthorized use of a trademark, finding that it did not waive its right to remand the action (SWC Inc. v. Elite Promo Inc., No. 16-cv-07071, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19513).



Judge Refuses Dismissal Of Claims Related To Online Sale Of Hair Products
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on Feb. 7 refused to dismiss a hair product company's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and intentional interference with contractual relations, finding that a retailer had notice that it was potentially selling unauthorized products online and that it showed that a valid contract exists (Unite Eurotherapy Inc. v. Walgreens Co., et al., No. 16-cv-01706, S.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18116).



Court Finds Nurse Did Not Waive Right To Pursue Claims Judicially
LOS ANGELES - A California appeals court on Feb. 7 affirmed a district court's decision to deny a hospital's motion to compel arbitration of numerous class action claims asserted against it by a former nurse, finding that the nurse did not waive her right to assert her claims in a judicial forum under her collective bargaining agreement (CBA) (Tanya Vasserman v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital, No. B267975, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 4, 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 90).



Judge Finds Truck Drivers Cannot Claim Damages Under Safe Harbor Provision
FRESNO, Calif. - A California federal judge on Feb. 15 issued his findings of fact and conclusions of law on causes of action asserted by truck drivers in relation to wage and rest break claims, finding that judgment should be entered in favor of a transport company on all of its claims (Todd Shook, et al. v. Indian River Transport Co., No. 1:14-1415, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21522).



Judge Remands Class Claims Against Courier For Lack Of Jurisdiction
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Feb. 3 granted an employee's motion to remand her class action claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and various labor codes, finding that her employer failed to show that the amount in controversy would exceed $5 million under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) (Jasmine Miller v. A-1 Express Delivery Services Inc., No. 16-cv-06251, N.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15795).



Wal-Mart Drivers Granted UCL Restitution In Minimum Wage Class Suit
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Jan. 25 granted in part a post-trial motion filed by a class of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. drivers who successfully brought minimum wage claims against their employer and awarded the plaintiffs nearly $5.9 million in restitution under California's unfair competition law (UCL) (Charles Ridgeway, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., No. 08-5221, N.D. Calif., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10510).



9th Circuit: Company Raised Material Triable Issues In Misappropriation Case
PASADENA, Calif. - A Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel on Jan. 30 affirmed in part and reversed in part a lower court finding in a trade secrets case, holding that a company's alleged misappropriation of certain documents was a material triable issue (Contemporary Services Corporation v. Landmark Event Staffing Services, Inc., et al. No. 14-56636, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 1614).



California Court Finds No Facts To Support Claims Stemming From Loan Assignments
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - A California court on Feb. 1 affirmed a trial court's decision to dismiss numerous claims against several mortgage entities in relation to the assignment of a loan, finding that the borrowers failed to submit any cause of action to support the theories that they relied on (Andrew Kalnoki, et al. v. First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLC, et al., Nos. C073207, C075062, C079144, Calif. App., 3rd Dist., 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 74).



Federal Judge Remands Claims Related To Loan Modification Request
LOS ANGELES - A California federal judge on Jan. 24 granted a borrower's motion to remand his lawsuit in which he asserted numerous causes of action against a lender related to the denial of a loan modification, finding that the court lacked jurisdiction (David L. Tripp II v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. 8:16-cv-1414, C.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9922).



Court Reverses Order Striking Voluntary Dismissal, Affirms Award Of Fees
SAN DIEGO - A California appeals court on Jan. 20 affirmed a trial court's decision to award a mortgage company fees it incurred and an award of sanctions but reversed a ruling that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to strike her voluntary dismissal and enter judgment against her (Gwendolyn Wilson v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, No. D070965, Calif. App., 4th Dist., Div. 1; 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 431).



Federal Judge Allows Borrower's Foreclosure- Related Claims To Proceed
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - After finding that claims asserted by borrowers whose property was sold at a trustee's sale even though they allegedly received assurances from lenders that the loan was current were sufficiently pleaded, a California federal judge on Feb. 14 denied a lender's motion to dismiss the case (Charles Hawkins, et al. v. Bank of America N.A., et al., No. 2:16-cv-00827, E.D. Calif., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20912).



9th Circuit Upholds Class Certification In Credit Card Processing Dispute
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal court did not abuse its discretion in certifying two classes in a lawsuit accusing the lessors of "point of sale" credit and debit processing equipment of scheming to defraud small businesses, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel ruled Feb. 7 (Just Film, Inc., et al. v. Sam Buono, et al., No. 14-16132, Rainbow Business Services, DBA Prevision Tune Auto Care, et al. v. Sam Buono, et al., No. 14-16133, 9th Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2164).



$67 Million Settlement Approved In Suit Over Allegedly Defective Solar Panels
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Dec. 22 granted final approval of a settlement by BP Solar International Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. that is valued at more than $67 million, to end a class suit accusing the companies of marketing and selling defective solar panels (Michael Allagas, et al. v. BP Solar International, Inc., et al., No. 14-560, N.D. Calif.).



Coconut Water Labeling Changes Reached To Settle Class Complaint
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - Harmless Harvest Inc., according to a motion for preliminary settlement approval filed Dec. 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, has agreed to remove the wording from its packages that indicates that its coconut water products are "100% Organic" and "Raw" in order to settle a class complaint accusing it of misrepresenting its products on its labels (Guoliang Ma, et al. v. Harmless Harvest, Inc., No. 16-7102, E.D. N.Y.).



Data Breach Class Action Filed On Behalf Of Yahoo Small Business Clients
SAN JOSE, Calif. - A customer of Yahoo! Inc.'s small business services filed a putative class action complaint against the firm Feb. 8 in California federal court, accusing the internet firm of negligence, breach of contract and unfair competition related to two recently announced data breaches that exposed customers' personally identifiable information (PII) (Brian Neff v. Yahoo! Inc. et al., No. 5:17-cv-00641, N.D. Calif.).



9th Circuit Vacates Ruling, Remands For Reconsideration Of Sanction
PASADENA, Calif. - After finding that a district court failed to consider certain factors when it imposed a sanction and excluded testimony in relation to an advertisement that products met military standards, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Dec. 14 vacated a court's dismissal of a plastics company's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and false advertising (Caltex Plastics Inc. v. Shannon Packaging Co., No. 15-55942, 9th Cir.; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 22204).



9th Circuit Finds Contractor Had No Payment Liability Under California Law
PASADENA, Calif. - The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on Jan. 3 affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss an environmental firm's claims related to a consulting contract for environmental work related to a proposed rail project, finding that a contractor was not liable under California law for certain payment obligations (Ultrasystems Environmental Inc. v. STV Inc., No. 15-55215, 9th Cir.; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 37).



Judge Finds Domino's Did Not Misappropriate Trade Secrets Or Violate UCL
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that a wireless communications company failed to show the reasonable efforts necessary to maintain its claim for misappropriation of trade secrets and failed to plead facts to support its cause of action for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), a California federal judge on Jan. 6 granted a pizza franchise's motion to dismiss the claims against it (Prostar Wireless Group LLC v. Domino's Pizza Inc., No. 3:16-cv-05399, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2999).



Judge Finds California Law Provision In Facebook Terms Is Enforceable
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that a California choice-of-law clause in Facebook Inc.'s terms of service is enforceable, a California federal judge on Jan. 9 granted the social media's company's motion to dismiss claims for violation of the New Jersey Truth-in-Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act (TCCWNA) (Jose Palomino, et al. v. Facebook Inc., No. 16-cv-04230, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2971).



Judge Finds No Facts To Support False Advertising Claims Against Ralph Lauren
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on Dec. 20 granted a clothing retailer's motion to dismiss a consumer's claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and claims for false advertising in relation to its pricing, finding that she failed to allege facts to support her class action claims (Courtney Dennis v. Ralph Lauren Corporation, No. 16cv1056, S.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 176856).



Judge Grants Stein Mart's Motion To Compel On 'Compare At' Claims
RIVERSIDE, Calif. - A California federal judge on Jan. 10 granted a retailer's motion to compel supplemental responses to certain discovery requests from a purchaser who asserts claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), false advertising and other claims related to its pricing (Marilyn Sperling v. Stein Mart Inc., et al., No. 15-1411, C.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3668).



Judge Finds No Jurisdiction Over Rental-Related Claims Against Landlord
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - After finding that a tenant's single federal claim failed, a California federal judge on Jan. 3 dismissed claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and the Rehabilitation Act against a landlord for lack of jurisdiction (Angelica Francis v. Accessible Space Inc., et al., No. 2:16-cv-1016, E.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 425).



Judge Finds UCL Claims Against Wells Fargo Fail For Lack Of Standing
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that two borrowers failed to adequately plead their claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and negligence, a California federal judge on Jan. 10 granted a motion to dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (Michelle A. Graham, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:15-cv-04220. N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3598).



Federal Judge Dismisses UCL Claim Against MERS For Failure To Amend
SAN FRANCISCO - After finding that a borrower failed to amend her claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and declaratory relief, a California federal judge on Jan. 3 granted a motion to dismiss a second amended complaint against lenders in relation to a mortgage (Modesta Jacinto v. Ditech Financial LLC, et al., No. 16-cv-02815, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1012).



Judge Allows Deutsche Bank To Amend Claims Related To Default Notices
SAN DIEGO - A California federal judge on Jan. 5 granted a bank's request to assert counterclaims against borrowers and to add various counterdefendants to an action in which property owners assert claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and other causes of action, finding that amendment would not prejudice the claimants (Rick J. Hinrichsen, et al. v. Quality Loan Service Corporation, et al., No. 16cv0690, S.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1670).



Magistrate Recommends Dismissal Of Foreclosure-Related Claims Against Loan Servicer
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - After finding no evidence to support a borrower's claims for wrongful foreclosure and violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL), a California federal magistrate judge on Dec. 22 recommended that his claims against a loan servicer be dismissed without leave to amend (Timothy Mulgrew Jr. v. Green Tree Servicing LLC, et al., No. 2:14cv2998, E.D. Calif.; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177715).



Federal Judge Transfers Employee's Class Claims Against Food Group
SAN FRANCISCO - A California federal judge on Jan. 6 granted a request by several companies to transfer an employee's class claims for violation of California's unfair competition law (UCL) and other causes of action related to alleged employment violations, finding that transfer to another federal court was appropriate because various factors, including the convenience of witnesses, weighed in favor of the transfer (Jorge Perez v. Performance Food Group Inc., et al., No. 15-cv-02390, N.D. Calif.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2319).



Tesla Owner Claims Model X Vehicles Automatically Accelerate
SANTA ANA, Calif. - An owner of a 2016 Model X filed a class complaint on Dec. 30 against Tesla Motors Inc., accusing the company of making faulty vehicles after he and his son were injured when his vehicle allegedly accelerated on its own while he was pulling into his garage (Ji Chang Son, et al. v. Tesla Motors, Inc., No. 16-2282, C.D. Calif.).