Subscribe: Comments on: UIEtips Article: Learning from the Facebook Mini-Feed Disaster
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
article  disaster  facebook mini  facebook  feature  feed disaster  feed  friends  learning facebook  learning  mini feed  mini  users 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: UIEtips Article: Learning from the Facebook Mini-Feed Disaster

Comments on: UIEtips Article: Learning from the Facebook Mini-Feed Disaster

UIE\'s latest insights on the world of design

Last Build Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:36:53 +0000


By: Ryan

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:12:13 +0000

The "Mini-Feed" is actually a feature on your own facebook profile page listing all of YOUR actions on facebook. I believe you are talking about the "News Feed", which is found on the homepage. This news feed, as you described, lists the activities of your FRIENDS, so you can see what you're friends' actions are and what they're up to. It seems odd to revolt against this feature, considering this is what facebook is all about: sharing your content with others. It's ridiculous that you would publish something on facebook, only to complain later that people are looking at it. There's a simple solution. If you don't want to share it then don't post it! Facebook has also recently implemented improved privacy options that address this issue.

By: Heidi

Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:25:12 +0000

I can't help wondering whether the mini-feed disaster was not in reality a well planned coup by the design team. It seems unlikely that Facebook designers would lack understanding of the core values of the solution, how social networks and the concept of friends worked in the minds of their users. Was the registration rate before mini-feed and during the introduction of the feature and protest campaigns ever compared? How many outraged users did in the end unregister? The success of the feature suggests the innovation filled a real need, its introduction could have been smoother but I wonder if e.g. opting in would have made nation-wide news. I know I should take the users' part but I can't help seeing brilliance in the "evil" path.

By:» Blog Archive » UIEtips Article: Learning from the Facebook Mini-Feed Disaster

Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:49:24 +0000

[...] UIEtips 7/16/07: Learning from the Facebook Mini-Feed Disaster When teams make critical feature changes in their designs, there’s always a risk of backlash from loyal users. That’s what happened to Facebook, the social networking site, a few months ago. Facebook’s designers created the mini feed, an exciting new feature that promised to offer users a vastly […] Source: [Link] [...]

By: Joshua Ledwell

Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:45:58 +0000

I've been thinking about this article. I agree with all of Jared's conclusions, but nevertheless I feel a sense of futility about it. As I read it, the key points are that organizations must know their users and how they use system features. They must design not only new features, but also the process by which users will learn them. It seems to me there are only two cases. One, an organization is user-centered and already knows and follows these practices. Two, an organization is not, so it doesn't take external feedback, *including this article*, into account. How do you get an organization that actually needs this advice to take it?

By: Wes Reed

Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:01:26 +0000

It seems like it would have been much smoother to build this as an opt-in feature allowing the user to turn it on when informed and sold on the value. That would prevent backlash and give a natural path to scale-up among the most tolerant users. This also would have added energy to the networking dynamics already in play by allowing users to tell their friends about it.