Subscribe: Comments on: Physics Strings Us Along
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade A rated
Language: English
answer  article  greene  jessica alba  kaku  lisa  money  physics  string theorists  string theory  string  theorists  theory  universe 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: Physics Strings Us Along

Comments on: Physics Strings Us Along

Last Build Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:26:09 +0000


By: Nigel

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:17:47 +0000

I hate the idea of personally ridiculing string theorists just because they are wrong scientifically, but who gave the idea to Laughlin for the following analogy in the San Francisco Chronicle? "... skeptics suggest it's the latest sign of how string theorists, sometimes called "superstringers," try to colorfully camouflage the theory's flaws, like "a 50-year-old woman wearing way too much lipstick," jokes Robert B. Laughlin, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist at Stanford..."

By: Bryan

Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:32:54 +0000

'...because she is usually right. Lisa just knows the answer.' This fear of pointing out potential problems 'because she is usually right' and 'just knows the answer' in my opinion makes Lisa sound patronising, which is why I left it out. It has nothing to do with the point being made, that someone senses a problem, yet does not have the courage to say so.

By: Rainey

Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:52:48 +0000

um actually i dont think the article was making fun of her at all. the actual article, on pages 38-40 concluded with the sentance: "But I don't say anything, because she is usually right. Lisa just knows the answer." Just pointing this out because if you read the above post Karch's comment seems pretty patronizing. Add the final sentance and he just sounds ignorant. Usually taking things out of context "warps" their meaning...;)

By: Bryan

Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:38:08 +0000

On the topic of Dr Lisa Randall, I think it sad that Scientific American made fun of her in the Oct issue, pp20-22. The article is headed 'The Beauty of Branes' and has a big picture of her in front of a blackboard. Underneath the picture is the caption: 'Lisa Randall: Warped Thoughts.' The article concludes by quoting her collaborator Andreas Karch of University of Washington: 'I often don't understand her. When she says things, they don't make sense and I first think 'she is crazy'. But I don't say anything...' With friends like these, who needs enemies?

By: Ranger

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:01:59 +0000 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: ALL TIED UP & STRUNG ALONG, a movie about String Theorists and their expansive theories which extend human ignorance, pomposity, and frailty into higher dimensions, is set to start filming this fall. Jessica Alba, John Cleese, Eugene Levie, Jackie Chan, and David Duchovney of X-files fame have all signed on to the $700 million Hollywood project, which is still cheaper than String Theory itself, and will likely displace less physicists from the academy. "As contemporary physics is about money, hype, mythology, and chicks," Ed Witten explained from his offices at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study, "The next logical step was Hollywood, although I thought Burt Reynolds should play me instead of Eugene Levy." Brian Greene, the famous String Theorist who will be played by David "the truth is out there" Duchovney, explained the plot: "String theory's muddled, contorted theories that lack postulates, laws, and experimentally-verified equations have Einstein spinning so fast in his grave that it creates a black hole. In order to save the world, we String Theorists have to stop reformulating String Theory faster than the speed of light. We are called upon to stop violating the conservation of energy by mining higher dimensions to publish more BS than can accounted for with the Big Bang alone, and I win the Nobel prize for showing that M-Theory is in fact the dark matter it has been searching for." Greene continues: "At first my character is reluctant to stop theorizing and start postulating, but when my love interest Jessica Alba is sucked into the black hole, I search my soul and find Paul Davies there, played by John Cleese. I ask him what he's doing in my soul, and he explains that the answer is contained in the mind of God, which only he is privy too, but for a small fee, some tax and tuition dollars, a couple grants here and there, and an all-expense-paid book tour with stops in Zurich and Honolulu, he can let me in on it. And he shows me God in all her greater glory, as he points out that we can make more money in Hollywood than writing coffee-table books that recycle Einstein, Bohr, Dirac, Feynman, and Wheeler. I am quickly converted, and I agree to turn my back on String Theory's hoax and save Jessica Alba." But it's not that easy, as standing in Greene's way is Michio "king of pop-theory-hipster-irony-the-theory-of-everything-or-anything-made- you-read-this" Kaku, played by Jackie Chan. Kaku beats the crap out of Greene for alomst blowing the "ironic" pretense his salary, benefits, and all-expense paid trips depend on. "WE MUST HOLD BACK THE YOUNG SCIENTISTS WITH OUR NON-THEORIES!! WE MUST FILL THE ACADEMY WITH THE POMO DARK MATTER THAT IS STRING THEORY TO KEEP OUR UNIVERSE FROM FLYING APART, OUR PYRAMID SCHEMES FROM TOPPLING, AND OUR PERPETUAL-MOTION NSF MONEY MACHINE FROM STOPPING!!" Kaku argues as he delivers a flying back-kick, "There can be ony ONE! I WILL be String Theory's GODFATHER as referenced on my web page!! I have better hair!" But Greene fights back as he signs his seventeenth book deal to make the hand-waving incoherence of String Theory accessible to the South Park generation, senior citizens, and starving chirldren around the world. "Kaku! Kaku! (pronounced Ka-Kaw! Ka-Kaw! like Owen Wilson did in Bottle Rocket)," Greene shouts. "It is theoretically impossible to build a coffee tables strong enough to support any more coffee-table physics books!!!" "Time travel is also theoretically impossible, but there's a helluva lot more money for us in flushing physics down a wormhole. Nobody knows what the #&#%&$ M stands for in M theory ya hand-waving, TV-hogging crank!!! Get it?? Ha Ha Ha! We're laughing at the publ[...]

By: MathPhys

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:57:53 +0000

I'm not shocked by the rise and rise of M Kaku in the US media, afterall, we have Jerry Springer. What I find shattering is that a salesman who starts every talk by plugging his most recent paperback, actually gets invited, along with respectable people like Vafa and Witten to conferences such as the Alexandria Einstein symposium.

By: Quantum_Ranger

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:10:11 +0000

Rob Scott says "Chris, according to the article there must be many universes where string theorists do indeed host Reality Shows, after all it is mathematically possible:) It’s just not this one". And thus, there is another Universe stringtheorists keep ignoring? This one! For if it is so that there are a multidude of Universes, then they have to admit that there is one Universe wherby the theory of strings does not exist? A stringtheorist who does NOT admit this fact, by their own scientific arena, methods of madness, must be 'string-calculating', inside this Universe, but the resulting evidence is elswhere! How can stringtheorists be so sure that stringtheory EXISTS in this Universe, and not in another perticular Unverse? by their own evidence of MW's, the evidence appears to be that Strings are elswhere, even though the theorists themselves, appear at first glance, to be residing in the same referenced Universe as the Human Race?

By: Egbert Humplebody

Wed, 12 Oct 2005 02:55:23 +0000

It seems there's another story in the news about how string theory can explain everything.

By: Rob Scott

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:26:05 +0000

Chris, according to the article there must be many universes where string theorists do indeed host Reality Shows, after all it is mathematically possible:) It's just not this one.

By: Lubos Motl

Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:59:36 +0000

I was personally not too happy with this article either. But let me mention that a physicist mentioned in your article ;-) may have had a different opinion.