Subscribe: Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on - new TOC
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/rss/TOC32.XML
Preview: Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on - new TOC

IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering - new TOC



TOC Alert for Publication# 32



 



A Qualitative Study of Application-Level Caching

Sept. 1 2017

Latency and cost of Internet-based services are encouraging the use of application-level caching to continue satisfying users’ demands, and improve the scalability and availability of origin servers. Despite its popularity, this level of caching involves the manual implementation by developers and is typically addressed in an ad-hoc way, given that it depends on specific details of the application. As a result, application-level caching is a time-consuming and error-prone task, becoming a common source of bugs. Furthermore, it forces application developers to reason about a crosscutting concern, which is unrelated to the application business logic. In this paper, we present the results of a qualitative study of how developers handle caching logic in their web applications, which involved the investigation of ten software projects with different characteristics. The study we designed is based on comparative and interactive principles of grounded theory, and the analysis of our data allowed us to extract and understand how developers address cache-related concerns to improve performance and scalability of their web applications. Based on our analysis, we derived guidelines and patterns, which guide developers while designing, implementing and maintaining application-level caching, thus supporting developers in this challenging task that is crucial for enterprise web applications.



A Survey of App Store Analysis for Software Engineering

Sept. 1 2017

App Store Analysis studies information about applications obtained from app stores. App stores provide a wealth of information derived from users that would not exist had the applications been distributed via previous software deployment methods. App Store Analysis combines this non-technical information with technical information to learn trends and behaviours within these forms of software repositories. Findings from App Store Analysis have a direct and actionable impact on the software teams that develop software for app stores, and have led to techniques for requirements engineering, release planning, software design, security and testing. This survey describes and compares the areas of research that have been explored thus far, drawing out common aspects, trends and directions future research should take to address open problems and challenges.



Reporting Usability Defects: A Systematic Literature Review

Sept. 1 2017

Usability defects can be found either by formal usability evaluation methods or indirectly during system testing or usage. No matter how they are discovered, these defects must be tracked and reported. However, empirical studies indicate that usability defects are often not clearly and fully described. This study aims to identify the state of the art in reporting of usability defects in the software engineering and usability engineering literature. We conducted a systematic literature review of usability defect reporting drawing from both the usability and software engineering literature from January 2000 until March 2016. As a result, a total of 57 studies were identified, in which we classified the studies into three categories: reporting usability defect information, analysing usability defect data and key challenges. Out of these, 20 were software engineering studies and 37 were usability studies. The results of this systematic literature review show that usability defect reporting processes suffer from a number of limitations, including: mixed data, inconsistency of terms and values of usability defect data, and insufficient attributes to classify usability defects. We make a number of recommendations to improve usability defect reporting and management in software engineering.



Static Analysis of Model Transformations

Sept. 1 2017

Model transformations are central to Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), where they are used to transform models between different languages; to refactor and simulate models; or to generate code from models. Thus, given their prominent role in MDE, practical methods helping in detecting errors in transformations and automate their verification are needed. In this paper, we present a method for the static analysis of ATL model transformations. The method aims at discovering typing and rule errors, like unresolved bindings, uninitialized features or rule conflicts. It relies on static analysis and type inference, and uses constraint solving to assert whether a source model triggering the execution of a given problematic statement can possibly exist. Our method is supported by a tool that integrates seamlessly with the ATL development environment. To evaluate the usefulness of our method, we have used it to analyse a public repository of ATL transformations. The high number of errors discovered shows that static analysis of ATL transformations is needed in practice. Moreover, we have measured the precision and recall of the method by considering a synthetic set of transformations obtained by mutation techniques, and comparing with random testing. The experiment shows good overall results in terms of false positives and negatives.