Subscribe: Meta - Recent changes [en]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Recentchanges&hideminor=1&feed=rss
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
line  older revision  revision june  revision revision  revision  user  wiki  wikimedia foundation  wikimedia  wikipedia  ← older   
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Meta - Recent changes [en]

Meta - Recent changes [en]



Track the most recent changes to the wiki in this feed.



Last Build Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:15:05 GMT

 



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:14:58 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:14, 23 June 2017 Line 5: Line 5:   Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadza, są w stylu pro-brytyjskim. Angażuje się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale jego zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła go ukarać.   Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadza, są w stylu pro-brytyjskim. Angażuje się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale jego zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła go ukarać.     − Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które go przedstawia, zostało skradzione z jego konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim serwisie parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości. + Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które go przedstawia, zostało skradzione z jego konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim forku parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości.       {{Training module quiz   {{Training module quiz [...]



Wikimedia Foundation QueERG/LGBTQ+ Speaker Series

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:14:55 GMT

setting up for translation ← Older revision Revision as of 14:14, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1: −
+   +
  '''Wikimedia Foundation QueERG:''' LGBTQ+ Speaker Series   '''Wikimedia Foundation QueERG:''' LGBTQ+ Speaker Series −
+
  +   + '''QueERG's LGBTQ+ Speaker Series''' is an effort to provide people involved with the [[Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] to hear from and interact with thought leaders connected to the [[w:lesbian|lesbian]], [[w:gay|gay]], [[w:bisexual|bisexual]], [[w:transgender|transgender]], or [[w:queer|queer]] communities.     − '''QueERG's LGBTQ+ Speaker Series''' is an effort to provide people involved with the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] to hear from and interact with thought leaders connected to the [[wikipedia:lesbian|lesbian]], [[wikipedia:gay|gay]], [[wikipedia:bisexual|bisexual]], [[wikipedia:transgender|transgender]], or [[wikipedia:queer|queer]] communities. + It is organized by the [[Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Foundation QueERG|Wikimedia Foundation QueERG]] in an effort to promote safe spaces and a greater understanding of the diverse communities both working within and served by the Wikimedia Foundation. −   − It is organized by the [[Wikimedia Foundation QueERG]] in an effort to promote safe spaces and a greater understanding of the diverse communities both working within and served by the Wikimedia Foundation.         == Speakers ==   == Speakers ==       === June 2017: Pax Ahimsa Gethen ===   === June 2017: Pax Ahimsa Gethen === − '''Living Persons'''
+   + '''Living Persons'''

  ''Trans lives and Wikipedia: Representation and impact''   ''Trans lives and Wikipedia: Representation and impact''     − Tuesday, 27 June 2017 - {{UTC with local time link|hour=20|minute=30|year=2017|month=06|day=27}} + Tuesday, 27 June 2017 - {{UTC with local time link|hour=20|minute=30|year=2017|month=06|day=27}}     − [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPhafGHTg6I Watch live on YouTube]
+ [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPhafGHTg6I Watch live on YouTube]

− Join discussion on IRC in {{Channel|wikimedia-office}} + Join discussion on IRC in {{Channel|wikimedia-office}}   +   + [[File:Pax Ahimsa Gethen headshot.jpg|thumb|Pax Ahimsa Gethen, aka [[w:User:Funcrunch|Funcrunch]].]]       '''About Pax Ahimsa Gethen'''   '''About Pax Ahimsa Gethen''' − [[File:Pax Ahimsa Gethen headshot.jpg|thumb|Pax Ahimsa Gethen, aka [[w:User:Funcrunch|Funcrunch]].]] + − Pax Ahimsa Gethen ([[w:User:Funcrunch|User:Funcrunch]]) is a queer black trans vegan activist, [http://funcrunch.org/blog blogger], and photographer. Assigned female at birth, Pax has legally and medically transitioned to male, but identifies as agender and uses gender-neutral pronouns (they/them/their). + Pax Ahimsa Gethen ([[w:User:Funcrunch|User:Funcrunch]]) is a queer black trans vegan activist, [http://funcrunch.org/blog blogger], and photographer. Assigned female at birth, Pax has legally [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:14:19 GMT

Created page with "Poradź użytkownikowi:K, aby skontaktował się z tym forkiem bezpośrednio, aby poprosić o usunięcie swojego wizerunku i zaproponuj aby zastanowił czy nie podjąć krokó..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:14, 23 June 2017 Line 12: Line 12:   | answer_1 = Doradzisz użytkownikowi:K, aby utworzył konto w tym forku Wikipedii i usunął obrażający go artykuł samemu. Udostępnisz użytkownikowi:K wskazówki dotyczące maksymalizacji jego bezpieczeństwa i prywatności na zewnętrznych stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec powtórzeniu się podobnej sytuacji w przyszłości.   | answer_1 = Doradzisz użytkownikowi:K, aby utworzył konto w tym forku Wikipedii i usunął obrażający go artykuł samemu. Udostępnisz użytkownikowi:K wskazówki dotyczące maksymalizacji jego bezpieczeństwa i prywatności na zewnętrznych stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec powtórzeniu się podobnej sytuacji w przyszłości.   | explanation_1 = Ta odpowiedź może być użyteczna, gdy użytkownik:K ma wolę zaangażować się w taką społeczność, ale bardziej prawdopodobne, że to tylko pogorszy sytuację.   | explanation_1 = Ta odpowiedź może być użyteczna, gdy użytkownik:K ma wolę zaangażować się w taką społeczność, ale bardziej prawdopodobne, że to tylko pogorszy sytuację. − | answer_2 = Advise User:K to contact the Wikipedia fork to request the removal of their image directly, and recommend they look into legal action against the offending site if they don’t agree to remove it. Provide User:K with guidance on security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future. + | answer_2 = Poradź użytkownikowi:K, aby skontaktował się z tym forkiem bezpośrednio, aby poprosić o usunięcie swojego wizerunku i zaproponuj aby zastanowił czy nie podjąć kroków prawnych przeciwko tej stronie, jeśli nie zgodzą się na usunięcie zdjęcia. Udostępnij użytkownikowi:K wskazówki dotyczące bezpieczeństwa i prywatności na zewnętrznych stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec powtórzeniu się takiej sytuacji w przyszłości.   | explanation_2 = Well done! This situation is difficult, though this the most effective of these actions. This allows the website (which may not otherwise be aware that the image is hosted by them) a chance to remove it or open discussions to begin that process. There may also be local laws which protect the privacy of User:K which the sharing of this image is breaking.   | explanation_2 = Well done! This situation is difficult, though this the most effective of these actions. This allows the website (which may not otherwise be aware that the image is hosted by them) a chance to remove it or open discussions to begin that process. There may also be local laws which protect the privacy of User:K which the sharing of this image is breaking.   | answer_3 = Block User:L immediately, as it's obvious they are the one involved with posting this image on external websites. Provide User:K with guidance on maximizing their security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future.   | answer_3 = Block User:L immediately, as it's obvious they are the one involved with posting this image on external websites. Provide User:K with guidance on maximizing their security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future. [...]



Template:Wikimedia movement affiliates/Wikimedia user groups

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:51 GMT

New MW Stakeholders Logo ← Older revision Revision as of 14:11, 23 June 2017 Line 146: Line 146:       {{Affiliates/listing-logo|code=MW-SG|name=   {{Affiliates/listing-logo|code=MW-SG|name= − MediaWiki Stakeholders' Group|fullpage=mw:Special:MyLanguage/MediaWiki Stakeholders' Group|logo=MediaWiki-notext.svg}} + MediaWiki Stakeholders' Group|fullpage=mw:Special:MyLanguage/MediaWiki Stakeholders' Group|logo=MediaWiki_Stakeholders'_Group_Logo.svg}}       {{Affiliates/listing-logo|code=MX-TMWL|name=   {{Affiliates/listing-logo|code=MX-TMWL|name= [...]



Fundraising

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:35 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:11, 23 June 2017 Line 5: Line 5:       Donations help the Wikimedia Foundation maintain server infrastructure, improve the software that supports our projects, and make Wikipedia and its sister projects accessible globally to millions of people. The fundraising team is responsible for raising the Foundation's budget through online campaigns. These campaigns have the additional goal to educate all readers about Wikipedia and how our movement works. We are grateful for all the readers, contributors, and donors who make Wikipedia and our other projects a global home for knowledge and discovery. To continue thriving we must constantly innovate, adapting to the changing needs of our readers and new advances in the technology that powers the Wikimedia universe. For additional information, please see the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2015-2016_Fundraising_Report 2015-2016 Fundraising Report].   Donations help the Wikimedia Foundation maintain server infrastructure, improve the software that supports our projects, and make Wikipedia and its sister projects accessible globally to millions of people. The fundraising team is responsible for raising the Foundation's budget through online campaigns. These campaigns have the additional goal to educate all readers about Wikipedia and how our movement works. We are grateful for all the readers, contributors, and donors who make Wikipedia and our other projects a global home for knowledge and discovery. To continue thriving we must constantly innovate, adapting to the changing needs of our readers and new advances in the technology that powers the Wikimedia universe. For additional information, please see the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2015-2016_Fundraising_Report 2015-2016 Fundraising Report]. −   −

Test

  − ===Online Fundraising===   − ===Foundation and Major Gifts===   − ===Endowment===   − ===Fundraising Operations===   − ===Fundraising Technology===   −   −         == Goals ==   == Goals == [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:33 GMT

Created page with "Ta odpowiedź może być użyteczna, gdy użytkownik:K ma wolę zaangażować się w taką społeczność, ale bardziej prawdopodobne, że to tylko pogorszy sytuację." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:11, 23 June 2017 Line 11: Line 11:   | correct_answer_id = 2   | correct_answer_id = 2   | answer_1 = Doradzisz użytkownikowi:K, aby utworzył konto w tym forku Wikipedii i usunął obrażający go artykuł samemu. Udostępnisz użytkownikowi:K wskazówki dotyczące maksymalizacji jego bezpieczeństwa i prywatności na zewnętrznych stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec powtórzeniu się podobnej sytuacji w przyszłości.   | answer_1 = Doradzisz użytkownikowi:K, aby utworzył konto w tym forku Wikipedii i usunął obrażający go artykuł samemu. Udostępnisz użytkownikowi:K wskazówki dotyczące maksymalizacji jego bezpieczeństwa i prywatności na zewnętrznych stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec powtórzeniu się podobnej sytuacji w przyszłości. − | explanation_1 = This answer might be useful if User:K is willing to get involved with such a community, though it seems likely to make the situation worse. + | explanation_1 = Ta odpowiedź może być użyteczna, gdy użytkownik:K ma wolę zaangażować się w taką społeczność, ale bardziej prawdopodobne, że to tylko pogorszy sytuację.   | answer_2 = Advise User:K to contact the Wikipedia fork to request the removal of their image directly, and recommend they look into legal action against the offending site if they don’t agree to remove it. Provide User:K with guidance on security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future.   | answer_2 = Advise User:K to contact the Wikipedia fork to request the removal of their image directly, and recommend they look into legal action against the offending site if they don’t agree to remove it. Provide User:K with guidance on security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future.   | explanation_2 = Well done! This situation is difficult, though this the most effective of these actions. This allows the website (which may not otherwise be aware that the image is hosted by them) a chance to remove it or open discussions to begin that process. There may also be local laws which protect the privacy of User:K which the sharing of this image is breaking.   | explanation_2 = Well done! This situation is difficult, though this the most effective of these actions. This allows the website (which may not otherwise be aware that the image is hosted by them) a chance to remove it or open discussions to begin that process. There may also be local laws which protect the privacy of User:K which the sharing of this image is breaking. [...]



Fundraising

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:11:09 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:11, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1:   {{hatnote|This is a general information page on Wikimedia fundraising. If you wish to make a donation, please visit https://donate.wikimedia.org}}   {{hatnote|This is a general information page on Wikimedia fundraising. If you wish to make a donation, please visit https://donate.wikimedia.org}} − + __NOTOC__   [[File:FY1415AmountDistributionPieChart.png|thumb|500px|right|Donation Amount Breakdown 2014–2015 Fiscal Year]]   [[File:FY1415AmountDistributionPieChart.png|thumb|500px|right|Donation Amount Breakdown 2014–2015 Fiscal Year]]   The Wikimedia Foundation Fundraising team cultivates the resources that propel our movement. We engage millions of people from countries across the globe to support Wikipedia and its sister projects. The overwhelming majority of the Foundation's funding comes from individual readers from all over the world giving an average of $15.   The Wikimedia Foundation Fundraising team cultivates the resources that propel our movement. We engage millions of people from countries across the globe to support Wikipedia and its sister projects. The overwhelming majority of the Foundation's funding comes from individual readers from all over the world giving an average of $15.       Donations help the Wikimedia Foundation maintain server infrastructure, improve the software that supports our projects, and make Wikipedia and its sister projects accessible globally to millions of people. The fundraising team is responsible for raising the Foundation's budget through online campaigns. These campaigns have the additional goal to educate all readers about Wikipedia and how our movement works. We are grateful for all the readers, contributors, and donors who make Wikipedia and our other projects a global home for knowledge and discovery. To continue thriving we must constantly innovate, adapting to the changing needs of our readers and new advances in the technology that powers the Wikimedia universe. For additional information, please see the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2015-2016_Fundraising_Report 2015-2016 Fundraising Report].   Donations help the Wikimedia Foundation maintain server infrastructure, improve the software that supports our projects, and make Wikipedia and its sister projects accessible globally to millions of people. The fundraising team is responsible for raising the Foundation's budget through online campaigns. These campaigns have the additional goal to educate all readers about Wikipedia and how our movement works. We are grateful for all the readers, contributors, and donors who make Wikipedia and our other projects a global home for knowledge and discovery. To continue thriving we must constantly innovate, adapting to the changing needs of our readers and new advances in the technology that powers the Wikimedia universe. For additional information, please see the [https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2015-2016_Fundraising_Report 2015-2016 Fundraising Report].   +   +

Test

  + ===Online Fundraising===   + ===Foundation and Major Gifts===   + ===Endowment===   + ===Fundraising Operations===   + ===Fundraising Technology===   +   +       == Goals ==   == Goals == [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:10:23 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:10, 23 June 2017 Line 3: Line 3:   ''Moduł ten będzie okresowo przedstawiać pytania wielokrotnego wyboru, które możesz wykorzystać do przetestowania swojej wiedzy. Choć wiele z sugerowanych odpowiedzi może wydawać się odpowiednie, pamiętaj, że należy starać się wybrać najbardziej odpowiednie opcje.''   ''Moduł ten będzie okresowo przedstawiać pytania wielokrotnego wyboru, które możesz wykorzystać do przetestowania swojej wiedzy. Choć wiele z sugerowanych odpowiedzi może wydawać się odpowiednie, pamiętaj, że należy starać się wybrać najbardziej odpowiednie opcje.''     − Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadzają, są w stylu pro brytyjskim. Angażują się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale ich zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła ich karać. + Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadza, są w stylu pro-brytyjskim. Angażuje się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale jego zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła go ukarać.       Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które go przedstawia, zostało skradzione z jego konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim serwisie parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości.   Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które go przedstawia, zostało skradzione z jego konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim serwisie parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości. [...]



Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Ventures Africa and Wikimedia Dinner on Future of Free Knowledge, Day 2/it

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:10:22 GMT

Created page with "Invece di concentrarci solo su dare accesso alla generazione attuale, dovremmo concentrarci soprattutto sulle scuole primarie. Il pubblico è la prossima generazione, e dovrem..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:10, 23 June 2017 Line 44: Line 44:   Dobbiamo anche creare una diversità di discorso per le persone che hanno lingue diverse.   Dobbiamo anche creare una diversità di discorso per le persone che hanno lingue diverse.     −  Instead of focusing on giving access to only the current generation, we should focus majorly on the primary schools. This audience is the coming generation, and we should focus intentionally on them as younger ones because their minds are still fresh and free from distractions, and they will absorb the narratives differently. It would be best to apply the subtle methods that effect cultural change with them. + Invece di concentrarci solo su dare accesso alla generazione attuale, dovremmo concentrarci soprattutto sulle scuole primarie. Il pubblico è la prossima generazione, e dovremmo concentrarci attentamente ai più giovani perché le loro menti sono ancora fresche e libere da distrazioni, e assorbiranno la narrazione diversamente. Sarà meglio applicare i metodi sottili che effettuare il cambiamento culturale con loro.        The medium for all of these is Digital because of the age we are in, it has to be relevant with the times.    The medium for all of these is Digital because of the age we are in, it has to be relevant with the times. [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:09:44 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:09, 23 June 2017 (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) Line 5: Line 5:   Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadzają, są w stylu pro brytyjskim. Angażują się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale ich zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła ich karać.   Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadzają, są w stylu pro brytyjskim. Angażują się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale ich zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła ich karać.     − Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które ich przedstawia, zostało skradzione z ich konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim serwisie parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości. + Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które go przedstawia, zostało skradzione z jego konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim serwisie parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości.       {{Training module quiz   {{Training module quiz   | question = Czy Ty...   | question = Czy Ty...   | correct_answer_id = 2   | correct_answer_id = 2 − | answer_1 = Advise User:K to create an account on the Wikipedia fork and remove it from the offending article himself. Provide User:K with guidance on maximizing their security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future. + | answer_1 = Doradzisz użytkownikowi:K, aby utworzył konto w tym forku Wikipedii i usunął obrażający go artykuł samemu. Udostępnisz użytkownikowi:K wskazówki dotyczące maksymalizacji jego bezpieczeństwa i prywatności na zewnętrznych stronach internetowych, aby zapobiec powtórzeniu się podobnej sytuacji w przyszłości.   | explanation_1 = This answer might be useful if User:K is willing to get involved with such a community, though it seems likely to make the situation worse.   | explanation_1 = This answer might be useful if User:K is willing to get involved with such a community, though it seems likely to make the situation worse.   | answer_2 = Advise User:K to contact the Wikipedia fork to request the removal of their image directly, and recommend they look into legal action against the offending site if they don’t agree to remove it. Provide User:K with guidance on security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future.   | answer_2 = Advise User:K to contact the Wikipedia fork to request the removal of their image directly, and recommend they look into legal action against the offending site if they don’t agree to remove it. Provide User:K with guidance on security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future. [...]



User:91.200.235.40

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:09:12 GMT

Tegel blocked 91.200.235.40 with an expiration time of 3 months (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) Cross-wiki spam: spambot




User:91.200.235.40

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:09:12 GMT

Tegel globally blocked User:91.200.235.40 (expiration 14:09, 23 September 2017) Cross-wiki spam: spambot




Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:08:49 GMT

Created page with "Het controleren of de Wikipedia gebruiker ooit on-wiki heeft gemeld dat de andere account van hen is (het omgekeerde, waarbij de off-wiki account zich off-wiki identificeert a..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:08, 23 June 2017 Line 9: Line 9:   * Het vergelijken van de interesses en schrijfstijl van de off-wiki dader met die van de on-wiki gebruiker.   * Het vergelijken van de interesses en schrijfstijl van de off-wiki dader met die van de on-wiki gebruiker.   * Het gebruiken van zoekmachines om een relatie proberen te leggen tussen de gebruikersnaam van de off-wiki dader op die website met de gegevens van de Wikipedia account.   * Het gebruiken van zoekmachines om een relatie proberen te leggen tussen de gebruikersnaam van de off-wiki dader op die website met de gegevens van de Wikipedia account. − * Checking to see if the Wikipedia username has ever mentioned the other account being theirs anywhere on-wiki (the reverse, where the off-wiki account identifies itself off-wiki as a Wikipedia account, is not verification of the linkage.) + * Het controleren of de Wikipedia gebruiker ooit on-wiki heeft gemeld dat de andere account van hen is (het omgekeerde, waarbij de off-wiki account zich off-wiki identificeert als een Wikipedia account is geen bewijs van de relatie).       Some ways your team may be able to request more information about the identity of the harasser from outside parties include:   Some ways your team may be able to request more information about the identity of the harasser from outside parties include: [...]



Wiki Loves Butterfly/Participants

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:08:26 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:08, 23 June 2017 Line 45: Line 45:   | 11||[[:en:User:sayan911|Sayan Sanyal]] ([[:en:User:sayan911|talk]]) || || Photo uploading in Commons and Identification of Species   | 11||[[:en:User:sayan911|Sayan Sanyal]] ([[:en:User:sayan911|talk]]) || || Photo uploading in Commons and Identification of Species   |-   |- − | 12|| [[:bn:ব্যবহারকারী:Tatocha|Tapas Deb]] ([[:bn:ব্যবহারকারী আলাপ:Tatocha|talk]])|| [[File:Tapas Deb DSC 6604.jpg|center|100px]] ||Creating and upgrading articles + | 12||[[:en:User:Subhajit Mazumder|Subhajit Mazumder]] ([[:en:User:Subhajit Mazumder|talk]]) || || Photo uploading in Commons and Identification of Species   |-   |- − | 13|| [[:en:User:Tapanoutsider|Tapan Pramanik]] ([[:en:User:Tapanoutsider|talk]])|| ||Photo uploading in Commons + | 13|| [[:bn:ব্যবহারকারী:Tatocha|Tapas Deb]] ([[:bn:ব্যবহারকারী আলাপ:Tatocha|talk]])|| [[File:Tapas Deb DSC 6604.jpg|center|100px]] ||Creating and upgrading articles   |-   |- − | 14|| [[:en:User:Karmakar Tarun|Tarun Karmakar]] ([[:en:User:Karmakar_Tarun|talk]])|| ||Identification of Specices + | 14|| [[:en:User:Tapanoutsider|Tapan Pramanik]] ([[:en:User:Tapanoutsider|talk]])|| ||Photo uploading in Commons   + |-   + | 15|| [[:en:User:Karmakar Tarun|Tarun Karmakar]] ([[:en:User:Karmakar_Tarun|talk]])|| ||Identification of Specices   |-   |-   |}   |}     − [[Category:Wiki Loves Butterfly|Participants]]Subhajit Mazumder + [[Category:Wiki Loves Butterfly|Participants]] [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:06:54 GMT

Created page with "Czy Ty..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:06, 23 June 2017 (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) Line 5: Line 5:   Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadzają, są w stylu pro brytyjskim. Angażują się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale ich zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła ich karać.   Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadzają, są w stylu pro brytyjskim. Angażują się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale ich zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła ich karać.     − Now, however, User:K has discovered that a photograph of them has been stolen from their social media account and used to illustrate parody articles on a pro-China Wikipedia fork (split-off site). It's not immediately clear who has done this, but User:K suspects it is the fault of pro-China User:L, with whom he has argued many times in the past. + Jednak teraz użytkownik:K odkrył, że zdjęcie, które ich przedstawia, zostało skradzione z ich konta społecznościowego i użyte do ilustrowania artykułów w pro-chińskim serwisie parodiującym Wikipedię. Nie jest jasne, kto to zrobił, ale użytkownik:K podejrzewa, że to wina pro-chińskiego użytkownika:L, z którym wielokrotnie spierał się w przeszłości.       {{Training module quiz   {{Training module quiz − | question = Do you... + | question = Czy Ty...   | correct_answer_id = 2   | correct_answer_id = 2   | answer_1 = Advise User:K to create an account on the Wikipedia fork and remove it from the offending article himself. Provide User:K with guidance on maximizing their security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future.   | answer_1 = Advise User:K to create an account on the Wikipedia fork and remove it from the offending article himself. Provide User:K with guidance on maximizing their security and privacy on external websites to prevent this from happening again in the future. [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:06:25 GMT

Created page with "Het gebruiken van zoekmachines om een relatie proberen te leggen tussen de gebruikersnaam van de off-wiki dader op die website met de gegevens van de Wikipedia account." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:06, 23 June 2017 Line 8: Line 8:   Mogelijkheden om de identiteit van een dader te onderzoeken zijn onder andere:   Mogelijkheden om de identiteit van een dader te onderzoeken zijn onder andere:   * Het vergelijken van de interesses en schrijfstijl van de off-wiki dader met die van de on-wiki gebruiker.   * Het vergelijken van de interesses en schrijfstijl van de off-wiki dader met die van de on-wiki gebruiker. − * Using search engines to try to connect the off-wiki perpetrator's username on that site with the details of a Wikipedia account + * Het gebruiken van zoekmachines om een relatie proberen te leggen tussen de gebruikersnaam van de off-wiki dader op die website met de gegevens van de Wikipedia account.   * Checking to see if the Wikipedia username has ever mentioned the other account being theirs anywhere on-wiki (the reverse, where the off-wiki account identifies itself off-wiki as a Wikipedia account, is not verification of the linkage.)   * Checking to see if the Wikipedia username has ever mentioned the other account being theirs anywhere on-wiki (the reverse, where the off-wiki account identifies itself off-wiki as a Wikipedia account, is not verification of the linkage.)     [...]



Talk:Community health initiative/User Mute feature

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:06:21 GMT

‎Deny permission to view special:contributions: new section ← Older revision Revision as of 14:06, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1:   {{:Community health initiative/Talk page disclaimer}}   {{:Community health initiative/Talk page disclaimer}}   +   + == Deny permission to view special:contributions ==   +   + Thinking out loud, if a user can prevent others seeing their contributions, there needs to be a tradeoff between preventing malicious users working around a per-username block and preventing abuse. I suggest that certain groups of editors should be able to view anybody's contributions, even if blocked. Certainly edits should not be hidden in the checkuser tool, and Oversighters should always be able to see a users contributions list - possibly after a click-through similar to admins viewing a deleted revision. Should this be available to other groups - to 'crats perhaps? I don't know about extending it to all admins, as certainly on en.wp there are allegations made of stalking against admins and admins who are subject to interaction bans. No global option wider than "all non-admins" should probably be included though (and that should be discouraged), admins having the right to see all contribs unless explicitly prohibited.   +   + Maybe to prevent abuse by spammers, accounts would need a certain access-level (autoconfirmed or extended confirmed perhaps) before having the option to deny visibility of their contributions. I can't think of an instance where we would trust someone not to abuse this but not trust them not to abuse other things that come with those access levels. Alternatively it could be disabled by default until switched on by an admin on request. [[user:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] (talk: [[user talk:Thryduulf|meta]] · [[:en:user talk:Thryduulf|en.wp]] · [[:wikidata:user talk:Thryduulf|wikidata]]) 14:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC) [...]



User:VanitaMatters6

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:05:48 GMT

User account VanitaMatters6 was created




Problems/List

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:05:39 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:05, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1:   Add problem at the appropriate place and sign it.   Add problem at the appropriate place and sign it.     − == Analysis needed == + == [[Analysis|Analysxxxis]] needed ==       == Analysis in progress ==   == Analysis in progress == [...]



Collaboration/Newsletter/Subscribers

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:05:28 GMT

Subscribed

← Older revision Revision as of 14:05, 23 June 2017
Line 99: Line 99:
 
# {{target|user=The222anonim|site=ru.wikipedia.org}}
 
# {{target|user=The222anonim|site=ru.wikipedia.org}}
 
# {{#target:User talk:SPoore (WMF)}}
 
# {{#target:User talk:SPoore (WMF)}}
  +
# {{#target:User talk:Usernamekiran}}



Problems/List

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:04:30 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 14:04, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1:   Add problem at the appropriate place and sign it.   Add problem at the appropriate place and sign it.     − == Analysis needed == + == [[Analysis]] needed ==       == Analysis in progress ==   == Analysis in progress == [...]



User:112.124.35.165

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:04:30 GMT

Tegel blocked 112.124.35.165 with an expiration time of 3 months (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) Cross-wiki spam: spambot




User:112.124.35.165

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:04:30 GMT

Tegel globally blocked User:112.124.35.165 (expiration 14:04, 23 September 2017) Cross-wiki spam: spambot




Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:04:28 GMT

Created page with "Het vergelijken van de interesses en schrijfstijl van de off-wiki dader met die van de on-wiki gebruiker." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:04, 23 June 2017 Line 7: Line 7:       Mogelijkheden om de identiteit van een dader te onderzoeken zijn onder andere:   Mogelijkheden om de identiteit van een dader te onderzoeken zijn onder andere: − * Comparing the off-wiki perpetrator's interests or writing style with the alleged on-wiki user + * Het vergelijken van de interesses en schrijfstijl van de off-wiki dader met die van de on-wiki gebruiker.   * Using search engines to try to connect the off-wiki perpetrator's username on that site with the details of a Wikipedia account   * Using search engines to try to connect the off-wiki perpetrator's username on that site with the details of a Wikipedia account   * Checking to see if the Wikipedia username has ever mentioned the other account being theirs anywhere on-wiki (the reverse, where the off-wiki account identifies itself off-wiki as a Wikipedia account, is not verification of the linkage.)   * Checking to see if the Wikipedia username has ever mentioned the other account being theirs anywhere on-wiki (the reverse, where the off-wiki account identifies itself off-wiki as a Wikipedia account, is not verification of the linkage.) [...]



User:TrudyTellez4@global

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:03:52 GMT

Tegel changed status for global account "User:TrudyTellez4@global": set locked; unset (none) Spam-only account: spambot




Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:03:35 GMT

Created page with "Mogelijkheden om de identiteit van een dader te onderzoeken zijn onder andere:" ← Older revision Revision as of 14:03, 23 June 2017 Line 6: Line 6:   Het vaststellen van de identiteit van de dader kan eenvoudig zijn of het kan onmogelijk blijken te zijn. Het is de verantwoordelijkheid van uw team of gemeenschap om te bepalen hoeveel en welk bewijs voldoende is om actie te ondernemen. Bedenk dat een wiki geen rechtszaal is en dat uw team extra rechten heeft gekregen omdat uw gemeenschap erop vertrouwt dat u de juiste beslissingen zult nemen.   Het vaststellen van de identiteit van de dader kan eenvoudig zijn of het kan onmogelijk blijken te zijn. Het is de verantwoordelijkheid van uw team of gemeenschap om te bepalen hoeveel en welk bewijs voldoende is om actie te ondernemen. Bedenk dat een wiki geen rechtszaal is en dat uw team extra rechten heeft gekregen omdat uw gemeenschap erop vertrouwt dat u de juiste beslissingen zult nemen.     − Some ways you may be able to investigate the identity of the harasser include: + Mogelijkheden om de identiteit van een dader te onderzoeken zijn onder andere:   * Comparing the off-wiki perpetrator's interests or writing style with the alleged on-wiki user   * Comparing the off-wiki perpetrator's interests or writing style with the alleged on-wiki user   * Using search engines to try to connect the off-wiki perpetrator's username on that site with the details of a Wikipedia account   * Using search engines to try to connect the off-wiki perpetrator's username on that site with the details of a Wikipedia account [...]



Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Ventures Africa and Wikimedia Dinner on Future of Free Knowledge, Day 2/it

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:03:29 GMT

Created page with "Dobbiamo anche creare una diversità di discorso per le persone che hanno lingue diverse." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:03, 23 June 2017 Line 42: Line 42:   La propaganda è molto importante per creare narrazioni che creino un cambiamento culturale. È adatta per un pubblico (l'attuale generazione) che è già profondamente radicata e preoccupata con le culture importate.   La propaganda è molto importante per creare narrazioni che creino un cambiamento culturale. È adatta per un pubblico (l'attuale generazione) che è già profondamente radicata e preoccupata con le culture importate.     − We also need to create diversity of discourse for people who have different languages. + Dobbiamo anche creare una diversità di discorso per le persone che hanno lingue diverse.        Instead of focusing on giving access to only the current generation, we should focus majorly on the primary schools. This audience is the coming generation, and we should focus intentionally on them as younger ones because their minds are still fresh and free from distractions, and they will absorb the narratives differently. It would be best to apply the subtle methods that effect cultural change with them.    Instead of focusing on giving access to only the current generation, we should focus majorly on the primary schools. This audience is the coming generation, and we should focus intentionally on them as younger ones because their minds are still fresh and free from distractions, and they will absorb the narratives differently. It would be best to apply the subtle methods that effect cultural change with them. [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:03:28 GMT

Created page with "Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszło..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:03, 23 June 2017 Line 3: Line 3:   ''Moduł ten będzie okresowo przedstawiać pytania wielokrotnego wyboru, które możesz wykorzystać do przetestowania swojej wiedzy. Choć wiele z sugerowanych odpowiedzi może wydawać się odpowiednie, pamiętaj, że należy starać się wybrać najbardziej odpowiednie opcje.''   ''Moduł ten będzie okresowo przedstawiać pytania wielokrotnego wyboru, które możesz wykorzystać do przetestowania swojej wiedzy. Choć wiele z sugerowanych odpowiedzi może wydawać się odpowiednie, pamiętaj, że należy starać się wybrać najbardziej odpowiednie opcje.''     − An editor who edits under the pseudonym User:K is known to edit controversial articles on the Chinese Wikipedia, including articles about Hong Kong's past as a British colony. The edits they make there are arguably in a pro-British style. They are routinely involved in brief edit wars and heated discussions related to these edits, but their conduct has never been deemed serious enough for the community to sanction them. + Edytor, który edytuje pod pseudonimem Użytkownik:K jest znany ze swoich kontrowersyjnych artykułów na temat chińskiej Wikipedii, w tym artykułów dotyczących przeszłości Hongkongu jako kolonii brytyjskiej. Edycje, które tam wprowadzają, są w stylu pro brytyjskim. Angażują się często w krótkie wojny edycyjne i ostre dyskusje związane z tymi zmianami, ale ich zachowanie nigdy nie było uważane za wystarczająco poważne, aby społeczność mogła ich karać.       Now, however, User:K has discovered that a photograph of them has been stolen from their social media account and used to illustrate parody articles on a pro-China Wikipedia fork (split-off site). It's not immediately clear who has done this, but User:K suspects it is the fault of pro-China User:L, with whom he has argued many times in the past.   Now, however, User:K has discovered that a photograph of them has been stolen from their social media account and used to illustrate parody articles on a pro-China Wikipedia fork (split-off site). It's not immediately clear who has done this, but User:K suspects it is the fault of pro-China User:L, with whom he has argued many times in the past. [...]



User:TrudyTellez4

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:03:08 GMT

Abuse filter blocked TrudyTellez4 with an expiration time of infinite (account creation disabled) Automatically blocked by the abuse filter. Rule matched: «Specific user page spam»




Steward requests/Global permissions

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:03:08 GMT

‎Global rollback for علاء: s ← Older revision Revision as of 14:03, 23 June 2017 Line 30: Line 30:   *{{Neutral}}, I trust him, but I can't support per Rschen7754, most of his edits are just renames, and I haven't seen him actively reverting vandalism. [[User:Stryn|Stryn]] ([[User talk:Stryn|talk]]) 21:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)   *{{Neutral}}, I trust him, but I can't support per Rschen7754, most of his edits are just renames, and I haven't seen him actively reverting vandalism. [[User:Stryn|Stryn]] ([[User talk:Stryn|talk]]) 21:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)   *{{s}}, per Alvaro Molina. - [[User:Prinsipe Ybarro|Prinsipe Ybarro]] ([[User talk:Prinsipe Ybarro|'''Talk to me''']]) 12:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)   *{{s}}, per Alvaro Molina. - [[User:Prinsipe Ybarro|Prinsipe Ybarro]] ([[User talk:Prinsipe Ybarro|'''Talk to me''']]) 12:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)   + * {{s}} reliable user. --[[User:Mirinano|mirinano]] ([[user talk:Mirinano|talk]]) 14:02, 23 June 2017 (UTC)       == Requests for global sysop permissions ==   == Requests for global sysop permissions == [...]



User:JhsBot@nowikisource

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:02:52 GMT

HakanIST changed group membership for JhsBot@nowikisource from (none) to bot per request




Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:02:11 GMT

Created page with "Het vaststellen van de identiteit van de dader kan eenvoudig zijn of het kan onmogelijk blijken te zijn. Het is de verantwoordelijkheid van uw team of gemeenschap om te bepale..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:02, 23 June 2017 Line 4: Line 4:   Als u een klacht ontvangt omtrent een off-wiki intimidatie, dan hoeft de melding geen indicatie te bevatten van de mogelijke dader. Als er wel een schuldige vermeldt wordt, dan dient u - indien mogelijk - eerst deze claim te verifiëren: is de Wikipedia-gebruiker daadwerkelijk dezelfde gebruiker als degene die de off-wiki intimidatie pleegt? Een aangevallen gebruiker hoeft niet altijd objectief en afstandelijk te zijn. Het is altijd mogelijk dat een derde partij zich voordoet als iemand anders en op deze manier zowel het slachtoffer en de zogenaamde dader aanvalt, of iemand die gebruik maakt van ons systeem om een goed bedoelende gebruiker lastig te vallen met wie ze een meningsverschil hebben.   Als u een klacht ontvangt omtrent een off-wiki intimidatie, dan hoeft de melding geen indicatie te bevatten van de mogelijke dader. Als er wel een schuldige vermeldt wordt, dan dient u - indien mogelijk - eerst deze claim te verifiëren: is de Wikipedia-gebruiker daadwerkelijk dezelfde gebruiker als degene die de off-wiki intimidatie pleegt? Een aangevallen gebruiker hoeft niet altijd objectief en afstandelijk te zijn. Het is altijd mogelijk dat een derde partij zich voordoet als iemand anders en op deze manier zowel het slachtoffer en de zogenaamde dader aanvalt, of iemand die gebruik maakt van ons systeem om een goed bedoelende gebruiker lastig te vallen met wie ze een meningsverschil hebben.     − Verifying the identity of the harasser may be a simple task, or it may be essentially impossible. It is your team's or community's responsibility to determine what amount and type of evidence is adequate to take action. In general, you should remember that a wiki is not a court of law, and your team has been entrusted with your advanced rights because your community trusts you to make good decisions. + Het vaststellen van de identiteit van de dader kan eenvoudig zijn of het kan onmogelijk blijken te zijn. Het is de verantwoordelijkheid van uw team of gemeenschap om te bepalen hoeveel en welk bewijs voldoende is om actie te ondernemen. Bedenk dat een wiki geen rechtszaal is en dat uw team extra rechten heeft gekregen omdat uw gemeenschap erop vertrouwt dat u de juiste beslissingen zult nemen.       Some ways you may be able to investigate the identity of the harasser include:   Some ways you may be able to investigate the identity of the harasser include: [...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/test-yourself-image-related-abuse/pl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 14:01:07 GMT

Created page with "''Moduł ten będzie okresowo przedstawiać pytania wielokrotnego wyboru, które możesz wykorzystać do przetestowania swojej wiedzy. Choć wiele z sugerowanych odpowiedzi mo..." ← Older revision Revision as of 14:01, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1:       == Przetestuj swoją wiedzę: nadużycie związane ze zdjęciem ==   == Przetestuj swoją wiedzę: nadużycie związane ze zdjęciem == − ''This module will periodically present you with multiple-choice questions you can use to test your knowledge of the module you are studying. While more than one of the suggested answers may seem suitable, remember that you should try to pick the most suitable of the options.'' + ''Moduł ten będzie okresowo przedstawiać pytania wielokrotnego wyboru, które możesz wykorzystać do przetestowania swojej wiedzy. Choć wiele z sugerowanych odpowiedzi może wydawać się odpowiednie, pamiętaj, że należy starać się wybrać najbardziej odpowiednie opcje.''       An editor who edits under the pseudonym User:K is known to edit controversial articles on the Chinese Wikipedia, including articles about Hong Kong's past as a British colony. The edits they make there are arguably in a pro-British style. They are routinely involved in brief edit wars and heated discussions related to these edits, but their conduct has never been deemed serious enough for the community to sanction them.   An editor who edits under the pseudonym User:K is known to edit controversial articles on the Chinese Wikipedia, including articles about Hong Kong's past as a British colony. The edits they make there are arguably in a pro-British style. They are routinely involved in brief edit wars and heated discussions related to these edits, but their conduct has never been deemed serious enough for the community to sanction them. [...]



Tech/News/2017/26/fi

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:59:53 GMT

Created page with "Käyttäjät voivat valita haluavatko he nähdä Wikidata-muutokset ryhmitellyllä tarkkailulistalla / ryhmitetyissä tuoreissa muutoksissa. Aiemmin tämä oli pois käytöst..." ← Older revision Revision as of 13:59, 23 June 2017 Line 12: Line 12:   '''Muutokset tällä viikolla'''   '''Muutokset tällä viikolla'''   * [[File:Octicons-sync.svg|12px|link=]] MediaWikin [[mw:MediaWiki 1.30/wmf.7|uusi versio]] otetaan käyttöön testiwikeissä ja MediaWiki.orgissa {{#time:j. F"ta"|2017-06-27|fi}}. Se otetaan käyttöön kaikissa ei-Wikipedia-wikeissä ja joissakin Wikipedioissa {{#time:j. F"ta"|2017-06-28|fi}}. Se on käytössä kaikissa wikeissä {{#time:j. F"ta"|2017-06-29|fi}} ([[mw:MediaWiki 1.30/Roadmap|kalenteri]]).   * [[File:Octicons-sync.svg|12px|link=]] MediaWikin [[mw:MediaWiki 1.30/wmf.7|uusi versio]] otetaan käyttöön testiwikeissä ja MediaWiki.orgissa {{#time:j. F"ta"|2017-06-27|fi}}. Se otetaan käyttöön kaikissa ei-Wikipedia-wikeissä ja joissakin Wikipedioissa {{#time:j. F"ta"|2017-06-28|fi}}. Se on käytössä kaikissa wikeissä {{#time:j. F"ta"|2017-06-29|fi}} ([[mw:MediaWiki 1.30/Roadmap|kalenteri]]). − * Users will be able to choose whether they want to see Wikidata changes in enhanced watchlist/recent changes. Previously, this was disabled for everyone. [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T46874] + * Käyttäjät voivat valita haluavatko he nähdä Wikidata-muutokset ryhmitellyllä tarkkailulistalla / ryhmitetyissä tuoreissa muutoksissa. Aiemmin tämä oli pois käytöstä kaikilla. [https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T46874]       '''Tapaamiset'''   '''Tapaamiset''' [...]



Wikimedia Foundation QueERG

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:59:17 GMT

GVarnum-WMF marked Wikimedia Foundation QueERG for translation




100wikidays/Levant women

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:39 GMT

‎Progress report ← Older revision Revision as of 13:58, 23 June 2017 Line 204: Line 204:   |-   |-   | 06-22 || {{u|Sg7438}} || '''10''' || fr || [[:fr:Tarab Abdul Hadi|Tarab Abdul Hadi]] || [[:d:Q7685176|Q7685176]] || 071   | 06-22 || {{u|Sg7438}} || '''10''' || fr || [[:fr:Tarab Abdul Hadi|Tarab Abdul Hadi]] || [[:d:Q7685176|Q7685176]] || 071   + |-   + | 06-23 || {{u|Pranayraj1985}} || 07 || te || [[:te:కమ్లియా జుబ్రాన్|Kamilya Jubran]] || [[:d:Q1349848|Q1349848]] || 072   |-   |-   |}   |} [...]



Wikimedia Foundation QueERG

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:27 GMT

setting up for translation ← Older revision Revision as of 13:58, 23 June 2017 Line 1: Line 1:   +   [[File:San Francisco Pride Parade 2012-4.jpg|left|225px]]   [[File:San Francisco Pride Parade 2012-4.jpg|left|225px]]  
 
'''Wikimedia Foundation QueERG'''
+ '''Wikimedia Foundation QueERG'''
  The Wikimedia Foundation's employee resource group (ERG) for members of the LGBTQ+ communities.   The Wikimedia Foundation's employee resource group (ERG) for members of the LGBTQ+ communities. −
+
− [[File:Wikimedia Foundation QueERG vertical logo.svg|right|250px|alt=Wikimedia Foundation QueERG's primary logo]] + [[File:Wikimedia Foundation QueERG vertical logo.svg|250px|right|alt=Wikimedia Foundation QueERG's primary logo]]     − '''Wikimedia Foundation QueERG''' is the [[w:employee resource group|employee resource group]] (ERG) for [[Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] staff, contractors, fellows, or interns who identify as a member of the [[w:lesbian|lesbian]], [[w:gay|gay]], [[w:bisexual|bisexual]], [[w:transgender|transgender]], or [[w:queer|queer]] communities, or as an ally to the LGBTQ+ communities. + '''Wikimedia Foundation QueERG''' is the [[w:employee resource group|employee resource group]] (ERG) for [[Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] staff, contractors, fellows, or interns who identify as a member of the [[w:lesbian|lesbian]], [[w:gay|gay]], [[w:bisexual|bisexual]], [[w:transgender|transgender]], or [[w:queer|queer]] communities, or as an ally to the LGBTQ+ communities.     − The group organizes activities and materials related to LGBTQ+ topics within the Wikimedia Foundation or [[Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia movement|Wikimedia movement]]. Monthly meetings are held to help organize these efforts and offer participants a safe space to discuss related matters and seek support when needed. + The group organizes activities and materials related to LGBTQ+ topics within the Wikimedia Foundation or [[Special:MyLanguage/Wikimedia movement|Wikimedia movement]]. Monthly meetings are held to help organize these efforts and offer participants a safe space to discuss related matters and seek support when needed.       Participation in all Wikimedia Foundation employee resource groups, including QueERG, is voluntary and designed to promote community, diversity, and saf[...]



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:58:13 GMT

Created page with "Als u een klacht ontvangt omtrent een off-wiki intimidatie, dan hoeft de melding geen indicatie te bevatten van de mogelijke dader. Als er wel een schuldige vermeldt wordt, da..." ← Older revision Revision as of 13:58, 23 June 2017 Line 2: Line 2:   == Off-wiki intimidatie: Het onderzoeken van meldingen ==   == Off-wiki intimidatie: Het onderzoeken van meldingen ==     − When you receive a complaint about off-wiki harassment, it may or may not say who the reporting party believes the perpetrator is. If it does include such an allegation, your first priority should be to verify, if possible, this claim: is the Wikipedia user actually the same user as whoever is doing the off-wiki harassment? A user in distress may not be a reliable judge. It is always possible for a malicious third party to be carrying out an impersonation that victimizes both the alleged target and the alleged perpetrator, or for someone to take advantage of our system to target a good faith user they disagree with. + Als u een klacht ontvangt omtrent een off-wiki intimidatie, dan hoeft de melding geen indicatie te bevatten van de mogelijke dader. Als er wel een schuldige vermeldt wordt, dan dient u - indien mogelijk - eerst deze claim te verifiëren: is de Wikipedia-gebruiker daadwerkelijk dezelfde gebruiker als degene die de off-wiki intimidatie pleegt? Een aangevallen gebruiker hoeft niet altijd objectief en afstandelijk te zijn. Het is altijd mogelijk dat een derde partij zich voordoet als iemand anders en op deze manier zowel het slachtoffer en de zogenaamde dader aanvalt, of iemand die gebruik maakt van ons systeem om een goed bedoelende gebruiker lastig te vallen met wie ze een meningsverschil hebben.       Verifying the identity of the harasser may be a simple task, or it may be essentially impossible. It is your team's or community's responsibility to determine what amount and type of evidence is adequate to take action. In general, you should remember that a wiki is not a court of law, and your team has been entrusted with your advanced rights because your community trusts you to make good decisions.   Verifying the identity of the harasser may be a simple task, or it may be essentially impossible. It is your team's or community's responsibility to determine what amount and type of evidence is adequate to take action. In general, you should remember that a wiki is not a court of law, and your team has been entrusted with your advanced rights because your community trusts you to make good decisions. [...]



Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Ventures Africa and Wikimedia Dinner on Future of Free Knowledge, Day 2/it

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:57:23 GMT

Created page with "La propaganda è molto importante per creare narrazioni che creino un cambiamento culturale. È adatta per un pubblico (l'attuale generazione) che è già profondamente radica..." ← Older revision Revision as of 13:57, 23 June 2017 (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) Line 38: Line 38:       ===Come creiamo il cambiamento e identifichiamo il pubblico?===   ===Come creiamo il cambiamento e identifichiamo il pubblico?=== − Ways to spur the needed cultural change (to affect the necessary media), can either be through Subtlety or Propaganda. But one needs to understand who the audience is, because the knowledge is not defined rather it is rooted in the audience. Therefore the Audience is very critical – and it is imperative that we identify the audience that will become the catalyst for cultural change. And also identifying them in their right proportions. + Il necessario cambiamento culturale (per influenzare i media necessari) può essere stimolato attraverso la sottigliezza o la propaganda. Ma prima bisogna capire chi è il pubblico, perché la conoscenza non è definita ma piuttosto è radicata nel pubblico. Quindi il pubblico è davvero critico, ed è imperativo individuare il pubblico che diventerà il catalizzatore per il cambiamento culturale. E anche identificarlo nelle giuste proporzioni.     − Propaganda is very important for creating narratives that effect cultural change. It is suitable for an audience (the current generation) that are already deeply rooted in and preoccupied with imported cultures. + La propaganda è molto importante per creare narrazioni che creino un cambiamento culturale. È adatta per un pubblico (l'attuale generazione) che è già profondamente radicata e preoccupata con le culture importate.       We also need to create diversity of discourse for people who have different languages.   We also need to create diversity of discourse for people who have different languages. [...]



Category:Wikimedia Foundation QueERG

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:50:12 GMT

GVarnum-WMF marked Category:Wikimedia Foundation QueERG for translation




Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/investigating-reports/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:48:10 GMT

Created page with "== Off-wiki intimidatie: Het onderzoeken van meldingen =="

New page


== Off-wiki intimidatie: Het onderzoeken van meldingen ==

When you receive a complaint about off-wiki harassment, it may or may not say who the reporting party believes the perpetrator is. If it does include such an allegation, your first priority should be to verify, if possible, this claim: is the Wikipedia user actually the same user as whoever is doing the off-wiki harassment? A user in distress may not be a reliable judge. It is always possible for a malicious third party to be carrying out an impersonation that victimizes both the alleged target and the alleged perpetrator, or for someone to take advantage of our system to target a good faith user they disagree with.

Verifying the identity of the harasser may be a simple task, or it may be essentially impossible. It is your team's or community's responsibility to determine what amount and type of evidence is adequate to take action. In general, you should remember that a wiki is not a court of law, and your team has been entrusted with your advanced rights because your community trusts you to make good decisions.

Some ways you may be able to investigate the identity of the harasser include:
* Comparing the off-wiki perpetrator's interests or writing style with the alleged on-wiki user
* Using search engines to try to connect the off-wiki perpetrator's username on that site with the details of a Wikipedia account
* Checking to see if the Wikipedia username has ever mentioned the other account being theirs anywhere on-wiki (the reverse, where the off-wiki account identifies itself off-wiki as a Wikipedia account, is not verification of the linkage.)

Some ways your team may be able to request more information about the identity of the harasser from outside parties include:
* Reaching out to the off-wiki site's Trust and Safety team for assistance
* Filing a complaint with the perpetrator's ISP, if it is identifiable
* In extreme cases, a legal representative may be able to subpoena information about the perpetrator
In all cases, you must remember that there is a difference between investigating a harasser and [https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/training/support-and-safety/dealing-with-online-harassment-other-forms/what-is-doxxing doxing] someone. Rarely will you need to find actual personal information about the harasser; most of the time you will simply be trying to find a link between one account and another. Even in cases where real-life identity becomes relevant, it is your obligation to not do more research than you must, and to think carefully about how to store such information.



Training modules/Dealing with online harassment/slides/images-involving-minors/nl

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:47:32 GMT

Created page with "Zelfs als de afbeelding met een minderjarige geen duidelijk misbruik of suggestie van porno bevat, kan deze nog steeds storend zijn. Op dit moment is er geen duidelijke regel..." ← Older revision Revision as of 13:47, 23 June 2017 Line 4: Line 4:   Als u vermoedt dat een afbeelding kindermisbruik of kinderporno bevat, verzoeken we u dit direct te melden via legal-reports@wikimedia.org aan het "Trust and Safety" team van de Wikimedia Foundation. Voeg een URL link toe, zodat de melding sne beoordeeld kan worden. Hoewel deze situaties zeldzaam zijn, dienen ze meteen beoordeeld te worden - en de aanwezigheid van alle relevante informatie bij het eerste contact versnelt de afhandeling aanzienlijk. De "Trust and Safety" team van de Wikimedia Foundation is belast met het rapporteren en verder afhandelen van zulke afbeeldingen.   Als u vermoedt dat een afbeelding kindermisbruik of kinderporno bevat, verzoeken we u dit direct te melden via legal-reports@wikimedia.org aan het "Trust and Safety" team van de Wikimedia Foundation. Voeg een URL link toe, zodat de melding sne beoordeeld kan worden. Hoewel deze situaties zeldzaam zijn, dienen ze meteen beoordeeld te worden - en de aanwezigheid van alle relevante informatie bij het eerste contact versnelt de afhandeling aanzienlijk. De "Trust and Safety" team van de Wikimedia Foundation is belast met het rapporteren en verder afhandelen van zulke afbeeldingen.     − Even if there's no obvious abuse or suggestion of pornography involved with an image of a minor, it can still be upsetting. There currently is no hard rule regarding the treatment of images of younger editors, uploaded by themselves or by others. Generally, it is best to use your common sense – would this image be harmful if it remained? Is this image within the scope of Wikimedia Commons? + Zelfs als de afbeelding met een minderjarige geen duidelijk misbruik of suggestie van porno bevat, kan deze nog steeds storend zijn. Op dit moment is er geen duidelijke regel omtrent het omgaan met foto's van minderjarige editors, zowel door henzelf als door anderen geüpload. Het gebruik van het gezonde verstand is in het algemeen het beste - kan deze afbeelding kwaad als het blijft staan? Voldoet de afbeelding aan de criteria van Wikimedia Commons? [...]



User:MarquitaBlesing

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:46:58 GMT

User account MarquitaBlesing was created




Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Ventures Africa and Wikimedia Dinner on Future of Free Knowledge, Day 2/it

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:44:51 GMT

Created page with "===Come creiamo il cambiamento e identifichiamo il pubblico?===" ← Older revision Revision as of 13:44, 23 June 2017 Line 37: Line 37:   Un punto valido che è stato fatto è che quando le persone vengono in Africa con l'idea di voler creare contenuto per gli africani, di solito vogliono creare contenuto nel modo che loro pensano sia corretto, invece di capire come le persone locali consumano abitualmente il contenuto. Se vogliamo davvero influenzare la cultura, è importante trovare il medium attraverso cui le persone consumano già il contenuto e influenzare entrare in quel medium.   Un punto valido che è stato fatto è che quando le persone vengono in Africa con l'idea di voler creare contenuto per gli africani, di solito vogliono creare contenuto nel modo che loro pensano sia corretto, invece di capire come le persone locali consumano abitualmente il contenuto. Se vogliamo davvero influenzare la cultura, è importante trovare il medium attraverso cui le persone consumano già il contenuto e influenzare entrare in quel medium.     − === How do we effect change and identify the audience? === + ===Come creiamo il cambiamento e identifichiamo il pubblico?===   Ways to spur the needed cultural change (to affect the necessary media), can either be through Subtlety or Propaganda. But one needs to understand who the audience is, because the knowledge is not defined rather it is rooted in the audience. Therefore the Audience is very critical – and it is imperative that we identify the audience that will become the catalyst for cultural change. And also identifying them in their right proportions.   Ways to spur the needed cultural change (to affect the necessary media), can either be through Subtlety or Propaganda. But one needs to understand who the audience is, because the knowledge is not defined rather it is rooted in the audience. Therefore the Audience is very critical – and it is imperative that we identify the audience that will become the catalyst for cultural change. And also identifying them in their right proportions.     [...]



Research:Characterizing Wikipedia Reader Behaviour/Robustness across languages

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:44:35 GMT

← Older revision Revision as of 13:44, 23 June 2017 Line 20: Line 20:   ==Motivation and Scope==   ==Motivation and Scope==     − We are interested to learn if the results observed in English Wikipedia (both the prevalence of use-cases as well as the sub-groups identified) are robust across languages, or to which degree and how user motivations differ between Wikipedia language editions. To this end, we are going to run the same survey on English Wikipedia as well as 4 more languages: Arabic, Hindi, Japanese, Spanish. The reason that we will run the survey on English Wikipedia again is that for comparisons across languages, we ideally need data points from the same points of times as the motivations of people may have changed in the past year. Collecting data from English Wikipedia will also allow us to assess whether the distribution over use-cases are robust over time. The choice of the four other languages was based on the following logic: We wanted to have at least one language that we know very little about the culture of its Wikipedia and its readers, we wanted to have at least one language with very large number of native speakers, we wanted to have at least one language with very large number of native speakers that is growing rapidly in Wikipedia content, and we wanted to complement the research on New Readers by having a non-English language that is under active research in that project. + We are interested to learn if the results observed in English Wikipedia (both the prevalence of use-cases as well as the sub-groups identified) are robust across languages, or if and how user motivations and behavioral characteristics differ between Wikipedia language editions. To this end, we are going to run the same survey on English Wikipedia as well several other language editions.     − While we were preparing for this part of the research, we realized that a good chunk of the analysis we do for these 5 languages can be done for some of the other languages that have high enough traffic to their Wikipedia site. As a result, we [https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2017-April/087279.html reached out to the broader Wikimedia community] to receive input and interest signals on whether it is useful for other language communities to have the results of a similar analysis. In doing so, we ended with 14 languages. + We started out with four more languages, i.e., Arabic, Hindi, Japanese, and Spanish. The reason that we run the survey again on English Wikipedia again is that for comparisons across languages, we ideally need data points from the same points of times as the motivations of people may have changed in the past year. Collecting data from English Wikipedia will also allow us to assess whether the [...]



Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Ventures Africa and Wikimedia Dinner on Future of Free Knowledge, Day 2/it

Fri, 23 Jun 2017 13:43:08 GMT

Created page with "Un punto valido che è stato fatto è che quando le persone vengono in Africa con l'idea di voler creare contenuto per gli africani, di solito vogliono creare contenuto nel mo..." ← Older revision Revision as of 13:43, 23 June 2017 Line 35: Line 35:   * Barriera e deficit linguistico   * Barriera e deficit linguistico   * Volontà culturale e politica di produrre il contenuto giusto per il giusto pubblico che cambi la narrativa del continente.   * Volontà culturale e politica di produrre il contenuto giusto per il giusto pubblico che cambi la narrativa del continente. −  A valid point made was that when people come into Africa with the idea that they want to create content for Africans, they usually mean they want to create content in a way that they think is correct, instead of understanding how the local people already consume content. If we want to really affect culture, it is important to find the medium through which people already consume content and find a way to affect that medium. + Un punto valido che è stato fatto è che quando le persone vengono in Africa con l'idea di voler creare contenuto per gli africani, di solito vogliono creare contenuto nel modo che loro pensano sia corretto, invece di capire come le persone locali consumano abitualmente il contenuto. Se vogliamo davvero influenzare la cultura, è importante trovare il medium attraverso cui le persone consumano già il contenuto e influenzare entrare in quel medium.       === How do we effect change and identify the audience? ===   === How do we effect change and identify the audience? === [...]