Subscribe: Comments on The Flying Trilobite: Art Monday: how much digital?
http://glendonmellow.blogspot.com/feeds/96816557852625494/comments/default
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
agree media  agree sean  agree  art  banner  digital  drawing  fun  good  inability make  media  mel agree  much  piece  screen  sean  tools 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on The Flying Trilobite: Art Monday: how much digital?

Comments on The Flying Trilobite: Art Monday: how much digital?





Updated: 2017-07-10T16:20:12.681-04:00

 



Craig, your echoing of McLuhan ("medium is the mes...

2009-04-01T06:15:00.000-04:00

Craig, your echoing of McLuhan ("medium is the message") makes me think a bit. In the case of 3-D programs, you may have a point. The goal is to produce something specifically based on what the program can do. Interesting.

Thanks for your comments about the crinoids too.

Zenga! The next plateau, eh? Hopefully not the next Sisyphean mountainside filled with frustration! Naw, I'm very very pleased with this piece. Came out very much like it looks in my head.



What up G-Mel!I agree with Sean,you should never d...

2009-03-31T12:57:00.000-04:00

What up G-Mel!

I agree with Sean,

you should never deny your self a tool that will help bring your art to the next plateau. I;m certain I will get the purest rebuttal here but I am all for using the tools at your disposal to achieve the final product. Thanks for the break down, It's fun to get a look at the artists process

Later days,
Christopher
thedayafterart.blogspot.com



The criniods were my favourite part of the banner ...

2009-03-31T03:29:00.000-04:00

The criniods were my favourite part of the banner (though the trilobite is pretty sweet too), but I couldn't tell why... Those tiny little added details add to them sooooo much! Especially when you focus on it (where in most of my pieces they fall apart once you look at them closer!)

Sean's line of logic that "Digital tools are just tools and should not determine the nature of the art being done" is funny... as back when I pursued 3D graphics as my artform of choice, I was doing it for the opposite reason.

The medium was the message, and my subjects were at its mercy.

I only recently have begun to get confident and comfortable enough with 3D to now understand what you both mean about letting the image guide the process... rather than the end piece being at the mercy of my (considerable less than either of your) skill level and capabilites.



Sean, I completely agree; the media being used are...

2009-03-30T16:51:00.000-04:00

Sean,
I completely agree; the media being used are subservient to the image, at least in the kind of artwork I enjoy creating and viewing.

Oils aren't for everyone and I personally have always had trouble painting in acrylic. It's comfort and enjoyment in taking the time to learn that help make the artist's work compelling, not the tool.

Eric,
The Intuos seems pretty good: the drawing surface matches the screen exactly, including toolbars.

The Intuos still has you drawing on the tablet and watching the screen: The Wacom Cintiq is the sweet one where you draw on the image itself.

I didn't find too much trouble matching up my eyes with my hand; I learned from Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain when in highschool, and spent a few years learning contours there (then light and shadow in university). A lot of the exercises in that book have you following the contours of an object while not watching the page to train the eye. Perhaps that helped.

I think spatially, I have also been helped by my years using American Sign Language. You don't get to watch your own hands when holding a conversation or interpreting Shakespeare plays.

My nephew (who's 7) had a lot of fun with the tablet. We're looking at getting getting one for him. Good for hand-eye coordination, I hope your daughter has fun with it! I should check out that Fisher-Price one: I've read good things.

I think you've hit the nail on the head, Eric: flexibility with multi-media.



I like the brighter page, I think I may switch min...

2009-03-30T13:49:00.000-04:00

I like the brighter page, I think I may switch mine to a lighter color, it's more upbeat.

I've just lately been experimenting with drawing in digital. I'm no artist, and it's not professional equipment, but it's fun. I ended up acquiring a Panasonic Toughbook (CF-m34, cute little thing) that was either going in to a crusher, or into my possession. It has a touch screen and I've been doodling in paint with a stylus. I like how you can undo a mistake so easily, and switch between different versions effortlessly. I do dislike how it doesn't seem to draw exactly where I'm drawing even after calibrating. I assume that your Intuos is better at that.

Does the pad have a screen or do you look at the computer monitor? I bought my daughter a Fisher-Price Digital Arts & Crafts Studio. It's a really neat toy for any budding artist kids you might know. I had a hard time drawing on it though; I couldn't get used to looking at the monitor instead of the tip of my pen. That's cool that you are mixing the two medias. It will give you extra flexibility that just using one or the other wouldn't give.



Well, it was my inability to make most conventiona...

2009-03-30T10:45:00.000-04:00

Well, it was my inability to make most conventional media work properly that led me to work digitally.

At the same time, who wants to do a piece that is obviously Photoshop? I very much agree with the stance you're taking. Digital tools are just tools and should not determine the nature of the art being done.

Speaking of which, the new banner looks great -- and it's all of a piece, the digital and the conventional tools merging seamlessly.

Given your facility with paint I suspect you'll never give it up entirely. Which is good.