Subscribe: Comments on: Is there a problem with the AskMe RSS Feed?
http://metatalk.metafilter.com/12189/Is-there-a-problem-with-the-AskMe-RSS-Feed/rss
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
achmorrison  ambrosechapel  askme feed  askme  bloglines feed  bloglines problem  bloglines  feed  posts  problem askme  problem  time 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: Is there a problem with the AskMe RSS Feed?

Comments on: Is there a problem with the AskMe RSS Feed?



Comments on MetaTalk post Is there a problem with the AskMe RSS Feed?



Published: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:32:22 -0800

Last Build Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:32:22 -0800

 



Is there a problem with the AskMe RSS Feed?

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:04:51 -0800

Is it just me, or is the AskMe RSS Feed reported to be broken on BlogLines more often than not?

"The feed URL returns a page that does not look like an RSS feed. This can be caused by the feed URL being incorrect, or it can be caused by a configuration issue with the server hosting the feed. If this error continues, you should check the feed URL and, if it is wrong, subscribe to the correct URL."



By: Gamblor

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:32:22 -0800

Nope, it's not just you. It's definitely hosed the majority of the time.

Thanks for bringing this up again; Maybe the squeaky wheel will get the grease.



By: achmorrison

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:40:15 -0800

Agreed.

This seems to be the biggest bug on the whole site.



By: Gamblor

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:54:25 -0800

I get nothing for days at a time, and then a deluge, if that helps diagnose the problem.

If I had to hazard a guess, could it be that there are special characters that are causing an error in some posts, maybe? Then once they work their way out of the feed, things start working again.



By: graventy

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:02:23 -0800

I thought the last time this was discussed it was found to be a bloglines problem more than an askme problem.

I have a number of sites whose feeds ebb and flow, like the tides. It's annoying.



By: jonathanstrange

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:12:02 -0800

Yeah, I get this too, and it drives me crazy... :( Thought it was just me.



By: mathowie

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:21:33 -0800

More often than not, it is bloglines' problem, nothing I'm doing wrong.

Always check the feedvalidator for errors
, and currently, everything is fine.



By: Gamblor

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:37:10 -0800

I don't doubt you, Matt, and if it was happening on any of the other sites, or any of the dozens of other feeds I subscribe to, as well, then I'd say it'd definitely a bloglines issue. But, for me, it only happens in AskMe, and it happens the majority of the time.



By: achmorrison

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:47:13 -0800

Matt, the problem with checking the feed validator is that it only has the last 25 posts.

The last working ask post in Bloglines was 41157 but there have been 64 posts after that. So somewhere before the last 25 posts, the feed was invalid.

Yes, it is mostly a Bloglines problem. But, if it prevents eyeballs from getting to ask, isn't it your problem, too?



By: achmorrison

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:55:10 -0800

Ferinstance, this question has a bunch of characters that the feed may not be handling correctly.



By: achmorrison

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:07:23 -0800

And there are a few posts between 41158 and 41196 that have lists in them and some other characters that might not be escaped properly...

Sorry to be grasping at straws...



By: AmbroseChapel

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:16:54 -0800

I work with XML a lot and the number one problem, the one I always check just on general principles, is dodgy characters from things like Word. The number two is dodgy HTML, and within that, probably dodgy entities.

Anyway, the best way to get a fix on this problem is to watch out for it to fail again, and come back and post on this thread?



By: Rhomboid

Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:14:38 -0800

It's definitely bloglines. I use the AskMe RSS feed extensively with Feedemon and I've never once seen any such hiccup.



By: AmbroseChapel

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:04:03 -0800

That might just mean that FeedDemon doesn't validate the RSS. RSS is XML, and if XML is invalid, then it's broken. If FeedDemon accepts broken XML and BlogLines doesn't, that doesn't mean BlogLines is to blame.



By: Rhomboid

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:25:51 -0800

The feed currently validates. It has validated in all the other threads where this was mentioned. If somebody can actually point to anything that would indicate that it is NOT valid, then that would actually be helpful, but lacking any such evidence the problem will just continue until bloglines stops sucking.



By: AmbroseChapel

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:20:21 -0800

That's what I just proposed. Watch out for it to fail again, then come back here and post and try to figure out why.



By: achmorrison

Fri, 30 Jun 2006 07:17:06 -0800

Rhombold, see this meta thread for an example of when the feed validated, but spit out a few warnings.

The frustrating thing is that it worked flawlessly for months (a year?) then all of a sudden, became erratic. (When the new layout came out?) The fact that no other feed does it for me (and others here) is really puzzling.



By: AmbroseChapel

Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:32:25 -0800

OK, it's busted now, according to bloglines, but the feed (I checked as soon as I saw the "broken" message) is valid according to the W3 validator.



By: achmorrison

Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:46:36 -0800

Yeah...and there were only 11 missing threads in the feed when it broke. None of them looked weird.

This is really frustrating.



By: AmbroseChapel

Sun, 02 Jul 2006 22:03:42 -0800

OK, the last "good" AskMeFi post in the Bloglines RSS feed is #41335 at the time of writing.

When I URL-hack to #41336, it's missing.

Could it be something as simple as that, or just a coincidence?



By: achmorrison

Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:37:05 -0800

I think that was a coincidence. It came back last night, but broke again sometime this morning. :(