Subscribe: LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Asbestos Legal News
http://feeds.feedburner.com/AsbestosLegalNews
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade C rated
Language: English
Tags:
app  appeals court  asbestos case  asbestos  case  court  exposure  federal judge  federal  held  judge  new york  new  york 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Asbestos Legal News

LexisNexis® Mealey's™ Asbestos Legal News



Headline Asbestos Legal News from LexisNexis®



 



'Substantial Justice' In $3.2M Verdict Against Jenkins Bros., Justice Says
JOHNSTOWN, N.Y. - Saying a $3.2 million asbestos verdict delivered "substantial justice," a New York justice on May 12 denied a valve maker's post-trial motion challenging the jury instructions and the exclusion of settled defendants' interrogatory responses and testimony from a Navy expert (Scott Shays v. A.O. Smith Water Products, et al., No. 703/2015, N.Y. Sup., Schenectady Co.).



Louisiana Court Adds $1M To Couple's 'Too Low' Asbestos Verdict
NEW ORLEANS - Evidence presented at trial and past jury awards in mesothelioma cases support raising a jury's noneconomic damages award to $1.5 million from $500,000, a Louisiana appeals court held May 24 (Frank S. Romano Sr. and Lynn Rome Romano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al., No. 2016-CA-0954, La. App., 4th Cir., 2017 La. App. LEXIS 961).



Defendants Tell Court No Reason Exists To Review Asbestos Expert Ruling
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - Two defendants freed from an $8 million verdict after a court found expert asbestos causation testimony improperly admitted at trial have told the Florida Supreme Court that there are no grounds for reviewing the decision (Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co., et al., No. SC16-2182, Fla. Sup.).



Parties Brief Proper Standard In Asbestos Case Against Respirator Maker
LOS ANGELES - Loosening the causation standard in asbestos cases to include safety equipment makers would only draw more cases to California's already burdened judicial system and is against public policy, amici told a California appeals court May 10 (William and Becky Tyler, et al. v. American Optical Corp., et al., No. B276847, Calif. App., 2nd Dist.).



Top Court Won't Review Reversed Asbestos Verdict Against Cruise Line
WASHINGTON, D.C. - The U.S. Supreme Court on June 12 declined to wade into a dispute over the proper causation standard in a Jones Act case involving allegations of asbestos exposure aboard a cruise line (Giovanna Settimi Caraffa, et al. v. Carnival Cruise Lines, No. 16-1074, U.S. Sup.).



Arizona High Court Set To Decide Asbestos Take-Home Exposure Case
PHOENIX - The Arizona Supreme Court heard oral argument on April 25 in a case in which it will decide whether the state recognizes an employer's duty for take-home asbestos exposures in a negligence action (Mary Quiroz, et al. v. Alcoa Inc., et al., No. 16-0248, Ariz. Sup.).



Court Finds Employer Had Duty To Prevent Take-Home Asbestos Exposures
LOS ANGELES - Employers and premises owners are liable for foreseeable take-home asbestos exposures under recent California Supreme Court precedent, a state appeals court held June 5 in reversing its previous ruling (Wanda L. Beckering v. Shell Oil Co., No. B256407, Calif. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 3).



Environmental Asbestos Exposure Claims Fail; Patent Claims Frivolous, Court Says
MADISON, Wis. - Environmental asbestos exposure claims appear to simply be an attempt at avoiding the exclusivity provision of the state's workers' compensation law, while claims involving the licensing of a patent appear entirely frivolous and must be explained, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeal held June 6 while affirming judgment for the two companies at the heart of the appeal (Janet Pecher, et al. v. Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-1799, Dianne Jacobs, et al. v. Rapid American and Weyerhaeuser Co. and Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-2376, Katrina Masephol v. Weyerhaeuser Co., et al., No. 16-2377, Robert Sydow, et al. v. Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-2378, Kathy Boyer v. Owens-Illinois Inc., No. 16-2379, Janice Seehafer v. Weyerhaeuser Co., et al., No. 16-2380., 7th Cir.).



Court: Questions Remain Over Ship Owner's Transfer Of Asbestos Liabilities
PORTLAND, Ore. - Liability is a nebulous term and absent an actual document demonstrating that a ship owner transferred all liabilities to a subsidiary, genuine issues exist about who is responsible for a man's exposure, an Oregon court held June 8 (Clifton J. Williams Sr., et al. v. CBS Corp., et al., No. A158077, Ore. App., 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 741).



Maryland Court Rejects Attempt To Keep Asbestos Case Outside Statute Of Repose
ANNAPOLIS, Md. - A woman's reading of the state's statute of repose is both outdated and implausible and does not preclude application of the law to her case alleging exposure from insulation applied to a generator whose construction was completed in June 1970, a Maryland appeals court held May 31 (June Diane Duffy, et al. v. CBS Corp., No. 453 September Term, 2015, June Duffy, et al. v. CBS Corp., No. 40 September Term, 2016, Md. Spec. App., 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 561).



Commercial Products Fall Under Government Contractor Defense, Court Says
SAN FRANCISCO - The government contractor defense applies to commercial products, a California appeals court panel affirmed June 6 in refusing to revisit a previous finding in an asbestos case (Jay Wanlass v. Metalclad Insulation Corp., No. A143616, Calif. App., 1st Dist.).



Justice Allows Deposition Into Italian Asbestos Products' Presence In New York
NEW YORK - Asbestos plaintiffs are entitled to discovery into how an Italian company's products ended up in a New York factory, the justice overseeing New York asbestos litigation held in an opinion posted May 25 (In re: New York City Asbestos Litigation David Cerutti and Steven Cerutti, et al. v. A.O. Smith Water Products Co., et al., No. 190009/2016, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.).



Additional Evidence Doesn't Warrant New Asbestos Trial, Connecticut Judge Says
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. - The existence of previously undisclosed industry group membership and asbestos air-sampling tests with little impact on a widow's environmental exposure case do not warrant a new trial, a Connecticut judge held April 26 (Marsha Lagerberg, executor of the estate of Erick Lagerberg, et al. v. Armstrong International Inc., et al., No. CV 11-6023127S, Conn. Super., Fairfield at Bridgeport, 2017 Conn. Super. LEXIS 833).



Ire Over Depositions In Asbestos Fraud Case 'Baseless,' Judge Told
NEWARK, N.J. - Having "[sown] poisoned seeds" by conducting a decades-long effort to destroy evidence of asbestos liability, a company now attempts to harvest its crop by complaining that class representatives accusing it of fraud do not know the precise impact of that scheme, plaintiffs told a New Jersey federal judge on May 30 in opposing a sanctions motion (Kimberlee Williams, et al. v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., No. 11-1754, D. N.J.).



Insulation Work Could Be Improvement Or Maintenance, Federal Judge Finds
CHICAGO - There is sufficient evidence that a premises owner retained control of its property and knew or should have known of the dangers of asbestos and that work on insulation and gaskets constituted maintenance rather than improvements to real property, a federal judge in Wisconsin held in denying summary judgment on May 15 (Beverly Ahnert, et al. v. Brand Insulation Inc., et al., Nos. 10-156, 13-1456, E.D. Wis.).



Widow: Contractor's Control, Knowledge Of Asbestos Supports $21M Premises Verdict
MIAMI - Evidence that a contractor controlled its asbestos-related work and knew of the dangers the work posed supports a jury's $21 million asbestos verdict, a widow argues in a March 28 brief to a Florida appeals court (Bechtel Corp., et al. v. Richard Batchelor and Regina M. Batchelor, No. 3D16-2624, Fla. App., 3rd Dist.).



Court Finds Error In Exclusion Of Co-Worker's Asbestos Testimony
AKRON, Ohio - A judge improperly excluded testimony after wrongly finding that a co-worker relied on hearsay from a supervisor rather than his own experiences regarding work with a defendant's asbestos-containing tape, an Ohio appeals court held May 31 (Ruth Williams v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., and Akron Gasket & Packing Enterprises, No. 28253, Ohio App., 9th Dist., Ohio App. LEXIS 2089).



Court: Expert Can't Link Auto Part Defendants To Asbestos Exposure
FRANKFORT, Ky. - Expert testimony that no safe level of exposure to asbestos exists does not overcome summary judgment where it is equally possible that a man's mesothelioma arose from other exposures, a divided Kentucky appeals court held June 2 (Tiffany Landreth, et al. v. Brake Supply Co. Inc., et al., No. 2015-CA-000006-MR, Pneumo Abex LLC v. Genuine Parts Co., et al., No. 2015-CA-000140-MR, Brake Supply Co. Inc. and Pneumo Abex v. Fortner L.P. Gas Co. Inc., et al., No. 2015-CA-000141-MR, Ky. App., 2017 Ky. App. Unpub. LEXIS 399).



Court Affirms Denial Of Motion To Seal Confidential Asbestos Memo
LOS ANGELES - A company's failure to try to contain a memo containing confidential attorney-client advice for more than three years, even as it went "viral" in asbestos litigation, warrants denying a motion to seal, a California appeals court held June 8 (Elaine Margie Paulus, et al. v. J-M Manufacturing Company Inc., No. B269904, Calif. App., 2nd Dist.).



Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Judgment In Asbestos Molding Compound Cases
WILMINGTON, Del. - A judge properly granted summary judgment in two asbestos cases based on inability to link the product in question to the plaintiffs, the Delaware Supreme Court held May 18 (Phyllis Gordon, et al. v. Reichhold Inc., No. 534, 2014, Michael J. Jamesson v. Reichhold Inc. No. 219, 2016, Del. Sup.).



Court: Asbestos Sales For Pipe Sold In Washington Don't Create Jurisdiction
SEATTLE - A broker's sales of asbestos to a California company selling pipe in Washington state do not create specific jurisdiction, but on remand the trial court should consider recently revealed evidence and precedent in deciding that the state had jurisdiction, a majority of the Washington State Supreme Court held June 8 (Candance Noll, et al. v. American Biltrite Inc., et al., No. 91998-4, Wash. Sup.).



5th Company Secures Jurisdiction Dismissal In Asbestos Action
SEATTLE - A couple alleging asbestos exposures in Canada lacks specific or general jurisdiction for a suit in Washington state against a defunct automobile parts seller, a federal judge held May 23 (Matthew Hodjera and Sylvia Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., No. 17-48, W.D. Wash.).



Trial Justice Approves $10M Settlement Of Asbestos Claims In Insurer's Liquidation
CONCORD, N.H. - A New Hampshire trial justice on May 22 approved a $10 million settlement between an insolvent insurer's liquidator and a manufacturer with regard to asbestos claims (In the Matter of the Liquidation of The Home Insurance Co., No. 03-E-0106, N.H. Sup., Merrimack Co.).



Court: Action Alleging Asbestos Defendant Withheld Insurance Coverage Time-Barred
BALTIMORE - Asbestos plaintiffs were on notice that a settling defendant could have more access to insurance coverage than previously disclosed after Porter Hayden, in which a court concluded that the aggregate limits in product liability policies did not apply to installation or operation claims, a Maryland appeals court held June 1 (Estate of Harold L. Adams, et al. v. Continental Insurance Co. No. 1065 September Term 2014, Md. Sp. App., 2017 Md. App. LEXIS 567).



Judge Finds Joinder Of Asbestos-Product Supplier Proper, Remands
NEW ORLEANS - A man's claims that his employer used products originally supplied by a defendant and that his work in two facilities could have put him in contact with other asbestos-containing products from the supplier create enough of a case to overcome claims that the defendant was improperly joined to defeat complete diversity, a federal judge in Louisiana held in remanding a case on May 22 (Ronald Smith v. Georgia-Pacific LLC, et al., No. 17-4698, E.D. La., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77044).



Judge Orders Briefing On Dismissal, Jurisdiction In Asbestos Case
SEATTLE - A couple must file supplemental briefs explaining why dismissal of a complete diversity defeating defendant is possible and providing a better explanation of a second defendant's corporate structure, a federal judge overseeing an asbestos action in Washington state held May 24 (Patrick Jack, et al. v. Asbestos Corporation LTD., et al., No. 17-537, W.D. Wash., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79813).



Asbestos Exposure Disclaimer Erases Doubt About Jurisdiction, Judge Finds
PORTLAND, Ore. - A disclaimer of any asbestos claims that would invoke federal jurisdiction erases any doubt raised by a woman's production of a list of U.S. Navy ships, a federal judge in Oregon held May 26 in adopting a magistrate judge's report and remanding a case (Melissa Coury, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., et al., No. 16-1796, D. Ore.).



Court Affirms Remand Where Couple Abandoned Federal Asbestos Claims
NEW YORK - A judge properly remanded a couple's asbestos action after they abandoned claims invoking federal jurisdiction, and dismissal of the last nondiverse defendant does not require a different outcome, a Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held May 31 (Alton Chapman, Frances Chapman v. Crane Co., et al., No. 16-933, 2nd Cir., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9732).



Judge Allows Amendment, Finds Allegations Support Removing Asbestos Case
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A shipyard may supplement its removal notice with government contracts and affidavits detailing the role the U.S. Navy played in requiring asbestos aboard ships, a Louisiana federal judge held June 2 (Lorita M. Savoie, et al. v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., et al., No. 15-1220, E.D. La., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84804).



N.Y. Justice Consolidates 2 Asbestos Cases, Leaves 2 Others For Separate Trial
NEW YORK - A living mesothelioma sufferer and a plaintiff alleging asbestos exposure in the U.S. Navy are sufficiently unique to require individual trials, a New York justice held May 18 while consolidating two other cases (In re: New York City Asbestos Litigation, Mary Murphy-Clagett, as temporary administrator of the estate of Pietro Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Water Products, et al., No. 190311/15, Joseph Fleigner v. A.O. Smith, et al., No. 190245/15, Ruth Story, individually and as the legal representative of the estate of Eugene Story v. A.O. Smith, et al., No. 190285/15, Kelly O'Connor, personal representative of the estate of Raymond Flood v. A.O. Smith, et al., No. 190147/15, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.).



Justice Consolidates 22 Asbestos Cases Into 14 Trial Groups
NEW YORK - A New York justice on May 19 fashioned 14 trial groups, ranging from single cases up to a grouping of four, from 22 asbestos cases. The plaintiffs had sought seven trial groups (Richard Aquitato, et al. v. Amchem Products Inc., et al., No. 190253/15, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.).



Expert Index
PLAINTIFF



Louisiana Jury Returns Verdict For ExxonMobil In Asbestos Case
NEW ORLEANS - A Louisiana jury on April 11 returned a defense verdict in an asbestos case claiming that a former contractor developed mesothelioma and died after exposures at an ExxonMobil Corp. facility, sources told Mealey Publications (Thomas H. Hayden and Jaqueline S. Hayden v. 3M Co., et al., No. 15-03732, La. Dist., Orleans Parish).



Jury Returns Defense Verdict On Environmental Asbestos Exposure Claims
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. - A Connecticut jury on March 17 found for a special materials company in a man's case alleging exposure to asbestos fibers that escaped from the company's facility (Audrey Gough, et al. v. Rogers Corp., et al., No. FBT-CV-15-6049135-S, Conn. Super., Fairfield at Bridgeport).



Justice Receives Briefing On Import Of New York Asbestos Causation Ruling
NEW YORK - Parties filing post-trial motions after a $7 million asbestos-tainted talc verdict in New York briefed a justice on May 15 over whether a February ruling involving the state's causation standard eliminates the ability to prove asbestos cases using cumulative exposure and visible dust evidence or whether it simply reiterates the existing framework (Claudine Discala, as administrator of the estate of Joan Robusto v. Charles B. Chrystal Company Inc., et al., No. 190413/2013, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.).



Cruise Line: No Review Needed In Attempt To Revive $10.3M Jones Act Verdict
WASHINGTON, D.C. - A trial court and subsequent state appellate court merely found that an asbestos plaintiff did not meet the causation standard for a Jones Act claim, a sufficiency-of-the-evidence ruling unworthy of U.S. Supreme Court review, a cruise line argues in a May 4 response, urging the court to reject a petition (Giovanna Settimi Caraffa, et al. v. Carnival Cruise Lines, No. 16-1074, U.S. Sup.).



Conn. Top Court Hears Need For Expert's Opinion In Product Defect Asbestos Case
HARTFORD, Conn. - Parties briefed the Connecticut Supreme Court on May 3 on whether a recent "modest refinement" to Connecticut's product liability standard requires expert testimony establishing that an asbestos-containing rotor blade adhesive was defective and unreasonably dangerous (Wayne Bagley, et al. v. Adel Wiggins Group, et al., No. S.C. 19835, Conn. Sup.).



Court Finds Work Testimony, Presence Of Asbestos Establish Exposure
TRENTON, N.J. - Evidence that a man worked with asbestos and that Union Carbide Corp. supplied more than 40,000 pounds of the mineral to the facility at which he worked are enough to establish exposure, even without a direct link, a New Jersey appeals court held in reversing judgment May 17 (Thomasina Fowler, et al. v. Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc., et al., No. A-2300-15T4, N.J. Super., App. Div.).



Judge Finds No Evidence Farm Hand's Work Included Manufacturer's Parts
WILMINGTON, Del. - Evidence that a farm hand worked with a company's tractors during a certain period does not establish that the parts he encountered originated with the manufacturer, a judge in Delaware held May 10 (Nathanial Harris v. Deere & Co., et al., No. N14C-03-220 ASB, Del. Super., New Castle Co.).



Judge: No Evidence Asbestos Exposure Came From Ford Tractor Parts
WILMINGTON, Del. - A farm hand lacks sufficient evidence that the tractor parts he worked with were original or that they originated with Ford Motor Co., a judge in Delaware held May 10 (Nathanial Harris v. Deere & Co., et al., No. N14C-03-220 ASB, Del. Super., New Castle Co.).



Judge Again Denies Sprinkmann Judgment In Asbestos Case
CHICAGO - An insulator must proceed to trial on asbestos exposure claims that it was previously denied summary judgment on by two other judges, and a footnote disclaimer of exposures filed in a parallel case does not prevent the man's widow from pursuing those claims, a federal judge in Wisconsin held May 11 (Beverly Ahnert, et al. v. Brand Insulation Inc., et al., Nos. 10-156, 13-1456, E.D. Wis., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72048).



Court Questions Duty Precedent On Way To Vacating $4.6 Million Asbestos Award
JACKSON, Tenn. - A divided Tennessee Court of Appeals panel vacated a $4.6 million take-home asbestos verdict May 12, finding that the jury instructions improperly allowed a jury to find negligence without first finding a defective product. All three judges questioned precedent governing how the state's courts decide whether a duty exists to prevent harm (Joyce and Ronnie Stockton v. Ford Motor Co., No. W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV, Tenn. App., 2017 Tenn. App. LEXIS 308).



Delaware Judge Won't Reconsider Manufacturer Take-Home Duty Ruling
WILMINGTON, Del. - A woman allegedly exposed to asbestos carried home on her husband's clothing has not alleged a change in law or newly discovered evidence that warrants revisiting a ruling that a manufacturer is not liable for her injuries, a Delaware state judge held May 11 (Elizabeth Ramsey, et al. v. Atlas Turner Ltd., et al., No. N14C-01-287 ASB, Del. Super., New Castle Co.).



Insulator Covers Liability, Statute Of Repose In Household Exposure Petition
SEATTLE - Summary judgment on the question of whether the state's statute of repose applies to a take-home asbestos case precluded litigating the issue at trial, and plaintiff's argument that the failure to raise the issue waived the right to appeal the ruling is nonsense, a company told the Washington Supreme Court on May 5, while also challenging whether it owed household members any duty at all (Estate of Barbara Brandes v. Brand Insulation Inc., No. 94199-8, Wash. Sup.).



Communications Companies Fight Strict Standard Applied In Remand Of Asbestos Case
SAN FRANCISCO - A federal judge applied an impermissibly high standard that federal contractors plead detailed facts in support of removal of an asbestos case, a "clean break" from controlling precedent that requires reversal, a trio of telecommunications companies say in a May 5 brief filed in the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (William Davidson, et al. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al., No. 16-17252, 9th Cir.).



Judge Finds Jurisdiction Lacking In Asbestos Case Against German Auto Maker
MIAMI - A German automaker's contacts with Florida are insufficient grounds on which to exercise jurisdiction over the company, a Florida appeals court held May 17 (Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft d/b/a Volkswagen AG v. Carol Jones, et al., No. 2D15-5716, Fla. App., 2nd Dist.).



Jurisdiction Frees 3 Automaker Entities, Talc Company From Asbestos Case
SEATTLE - A couple alleging asbestos exposures in Canada lacks specific or general jurisdiction for a suit in Washington state against a trio of Volkswagen entities or talc company Whittaker Clark Daniels, a federal judge held May 17 (Matthew Hodjera and Sylvia Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., No. 17-48, W.D. Wash.).



Justice Allows Addition Of Improperly Named Company To Maritime Asbestos Suit
NEW YORK - A man's maritime asbestos suit improperly naming a successor as a defendant put an independent corporation that operates as a subsidiary of the named defendant on notice that it was being sued, a New York justice held in an opinion posted May 18 (Joseph J. Crandley v. Farrell Lines Inc., et al., No. 190033/2017, N.Y. Sup., New York Co., 2017 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1836).



John Crane Takes RICO Claims Against Lawyers To Pennsylvania Federal Court
PHILADELPHIA - Less than two months after having its fraud and racketeering claims against two law firms and their founders dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction, John Crane Inc. (JCI) filed the identical claims against one of the firms and its principals in Pennsylvania federal court May 15 (John Crane Inc. v. Shein Law Center Ltd., et al., No. 2:17-cv-02210, E.D. Pa.).



Talc Company Accused Of Fraud Doesn't Need Discovery, Asbestos Plaintiffs Argue
NEWARK, N.J. - Discovery into underlying asbestos claims is not warranted in a class action alleging that a talc company destroyed evidence relevant to asbestos claims because the case involves the scheme to protect the company from liability, not the tort actions, plaintiffs told a federal judge in New Jersey on May 12 (Kimberlee Williams, et al. v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., No. 11-1754, D. N.J.).



Mississippi Supreme Court Reverses $14M Silicosis Verdict As Time-Barred
JACKSON, Miss. - A man's chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis started the clock on the statute of limitations and bars his silicosis claim against a respirator manufacturer, a divided Mississippi Supreme Court held May 18 in reversing a $14 million verdict (American Optical Corp. v. Estate of Robert Lee Rankin Sr., et al., No. 2015-CA-0166-SCT, Miss. Sup., 2017 Miss. LEXIS 190).



Expert Index
PLAINTIFF



New York Jury Hands Boiler Company Verdict In Asbestos Case
NEW YORK - A New York jury on May 3 found that boiler company Burnham [ee]LLC was not liable for failing to warn about the dangers of asbestos and was not a substantial factor in a man's mesothelioma, sources told Mealey Publications. The justice presiding over the case had previously allowed experts to testify to what Burnham characterized as the opinion that "every exposure" to asbestos caused disease (Jeanne Evans, et al. v. 3M Co., et al., No. 190109/2015, N.Y. Sup., New York Co.).



Pennsylvania Jury Awards $220,000 For Asbestos-Related Laryngeal Cancer
PHILADELPHIA - A Pennsylvania jury on March 29 awarded a man suffering from asbestos-related laryngeal cancer $220,000 and found the lone remaining defendant, John Crane Inc., one of three liable parties, sources told Mealey Publications (William Murray, et al. v. Durametallic Corp., et al., No. 150701334, Pa. Comm. Pls., Philadelphia Co.).



Expert, Household Duty Rulings, In $3M Asbestos Verdict
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - A federal judge in Alabama did not err in admitting expert testimony that all significant asbestos exposures contribute to mesothelioma nor in concluding that an employer can be liable for exposing household members to asbestos, an 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held April 26 (Melissa Ann Bobo and Sharon Jean Cox, as co-personal representatives of the estate of Barbara Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority, No. 12-S-1930, N.D. Ala., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130741).



9th Circuit Permits Expert's Testimony Regarding Origin Of Asbestos Insulation
SAN FRANCISCO - An expert's knowledge regarding U.S. Navy practices and procedures qualifies him to testify that the asbestos-containing insulation to which a man was exposed was likely original to the boilers in question, and he need not have firsthand knowledge, a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel held April 26 (Geraldine Hilt, et al. v. Foster Wheeler LLC, FKA Foster Wheeler Corp., No. 15-17301, 9th Cir.).



N.Y. Court Affirms Admission Of Expert Testimony, Resulting $4M Asbestos Verdict
ALBANY, N.Y. - Plaintiffs need only present evidence that asbestos exposures were sufficient to cause disease and need not provide a specific numerical value, a New York court held April 28 on its way to affirming a $4 million verdict (Nicholas Dominick and Lorraine J. Dominick v. Charles Millar & Son Co., et al., No. 16-02017, N.Y. Sup., App. Div., 4th Dept.).



Widow: $9M Asbestos Verdict Wasn't Built On 'Every Exposure' Testimony
MIAMI - A widow defended her $9 million bystander asbestos verdict to a Florida appeals court on April 25, saying her expert did not testify that every exposure to asbestos was a substantial factor in any resulting disease and that sufficient evidence of causation exists (Northrup Grumman Systems Corp., et al. v. Rosa-Maria Britt, et al., No. 3D16-2583, Fla. App., 3rd Dist.).



Judge: Asbestos Defendant May Conduct Destructive Testing Of Pathology Materials
BATON ROUGE, La. - A company defending an asbestos action may conduct destructive fiber burden analysis testing of pathology materials, a federal judge in Louisiana held April 26 (William D. Coleman v. Anco Insulations Inc., et al., No. 15-821, M.D. La., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62987).



Plaintiff Who Lost $8M Asbestos Verdict Wants Causation Cases Consolidated
FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. - A motion by an asbestos plaintiff seeking to consolidate her appeal of a ruling excluding expert causation testimony involving cigarette filters with a second case challenging application of the Daubert standard is inappropriate because the court previously stayed her case and because the Florida Supreme Court has not accepted either case for review, Crane Co. told the court on March 14 (Richard DeLisle v. Crane Co., et al., No. SC16-2182, Fla. Sup.).



Missouri Court Affirms $10M Punitive Award, Rejects Crane Co.'s Bare-Metal Defense
ST. LOUIS - Sufficient evidence supports failure-to-warn and design defect claims against Crane Co., as well as a jury's eventual $10 million punitive damages award, a Missouri appeals court held May 2 while also rejecting the company's argument that it could not be liable for asbestos-containing parts used on its bare-metal valves (Jeanette G. Poage, et al. v. 3M Co., et al., No. ED 103953, Mo. App., Eastern Dist., 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 362).



Contractor Seeks To Overturn $21M Premises Liability Asbestos Verdict
MIAMI - A jury's $21 million asbestos verdict against a contractor on premises liability claims fails as a matter of law because there is no evidence that the company maintained control over the property, and expert causation evidence rested on "an impermissible pyramiding of inferences," the company told a Florida appeals court on March 6 (Bechtel Corp., et al. v. Richard Batchelor and Regina M. Batchelor, No. 3D16-2624, Fla. App., 3rd Dist.).



California Court Set To Hear Take-Home Asbestos Case After Supplemental Briefing
FRESNO, Calif. - A California appeals court will hear oral arguments May 9 in a man's case alleging exposure to asbestos his parents brought home with them from employment with the city of Modesto. The man recently briefed the court on the impact of Kesner v. Superior Court on the case (Nolan J. Lamb v. City of Modesto, No. F073167, Calif. App., 5th Dist.).



Premarital Asbestos Exposure Can't Bar Consortium Claim, Florida Top Court Told
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - An appeals court erred in concluding that because a man's asbestos exposure occurred prior to marriage, his widow cannot pursue a statutory loss of consortium claim, the woman told the Florida Supreme Court April 21 (Janis Kelly, et al. v. Georgia-Pacific LLC, et al., No. SC17-714, Fla. Sup.).



Coke Oven Batteries Aren't Products, New York Court Says In Dismissing Action
BUFFALO, N.Y. - The nature of coke oven batteries makes their installation a service more so than a product, a New York appeals court held in reversing denial of summary judgment and dismissing a case alleging asbestos exposures (In the matter of the Eighth Judicial District Asbestos Litigation, Donald J. Terwilliger, et al. v. Beazer East Inc., et al., No. 85 CA 16-00947, N.Y. Sup. App., 4th Dist., 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3580).



LHWCA Completely Immunizes Employer From Third-Party Asbestos Claims, Judge Says
BALTIMORE - A man's asbestos-related exposures occurring during work covered by the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) provide his employer with immunity from third-party claims, a federal judge in Maryland held April 25 in granting a railroad summary judgment (Charles Lemuel Arbogast Jr., et al. v. A.W. Chesterton Co., et al., No. 14-4049, D. Md.; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62255).



Court Rejects Apportionment In Workers' Compensation Pleural Plaques Case
NEW YORK - Apportionment of liability between employers who exposed a man pursing a workers' compensation case is inappropriate where all the evidence leads one to conclude that he suffered from no symptoms or disease prior to his May 1999 pleural plaques diagnosis, a New York appeals court held May 4 (In the matter of the claim of Robert Manocchio v. ABB Combustion Engineering, et al., No. 522436, N.Y. Sup. App., 3rd Dept., 2017 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3509).



Asbestos-Talc Defendant Accused Of Fraud Wants Plaintiffs' Counsel Sanctioned
NEWARK, N.J. - Class counsel's failure to comply with basic discovery obligations requires imposing sanctions and an order mandating compliance, a company accused of hiding and destroying evidence of asbestos-contamination of its talc 25-years ago told a federal judge in New Jersey on May 1. Meanwhile, the parties continue to battle over whether third-party attorneys and firms must turn over evidence relating to the underlying asbestos tort claims (Kimberlee Williams, et al. v. BASF Catalysts LLC, et al., No. 11-1754, D. N.J.).



Court Affirms Workers' Comp Award Involving Asbestos, Bladder Cancer
HARRISBURG, Pa. - While not uncontested, enough evidence supports a law judge's conclusion that an employee was both exposed to asbestos and other chemicals within the compensable period for a workers' compensation claim and that the exposure was significant enough to cause bladder cancer, a Pennsylvania appeals court held May 4 (Kimberly Clark Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, No. 656 C.D. 2016, Pa. Cmwlth., 2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 175).



Judge: Failure To Disclose Tort To Bankruptcy Court Precludes Asbestos Case
NEW YORK - Collateral estoppel dictates that a couple may not pursue an asbestos action after failing to disclose the potential tort in an pending bankruptcy, a federal judge in New York held April 28 (John Clark and Michelle Clark v. Advanced Composites Group, et al., No. 16-6422, S.D. N.Y., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68812).



Widow: Asbestos Company's Jurisdiction Arguments Produce 'Absurd' Results
MIAMI - A chemical company sued over its past asbestos dealings argues for a jurisdictional doctrine that would create an explosion of asbestos litigation and effectively leave it open to suit only in the state where it is incorporated, an "absurd" result, a widow told the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals April 26 (James John Waite Jr. and Sandra Waite v. AII Acquisition Corp., et al., No. 16-15569, 11th Cir.).



Voluntary Dismissal Would Prejudice Defendants, Rhode Island Justice Finds
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - Participation in an asbestos case, including pending motions for summary judgment, puts two companies far enough into the litigation that they would be prejudiced by the plaintiff's voluntary dismissal and refiling of the action, a judge in Rhode Island held April 20 (Loretta Belac v. 3M Co., et al., No. PC-16-0544, R.I. Super., Providence Plantation, 2017 R.I. Super. LEXIS 70).



Judge: Removing Negligence Case Requires More Than Mandate That Asbestos Be Used
NEW ORLEANS - Removing a case alleging negligence arising from a shipbuilder's alleged discretionary use of asbestos requires more than a simple showing that the U.S. Navy mandated use of the mineral since the claims stem not from its presence, but from its misuse, a federal judge in Louisiana said April 25 (Stephen R. Legendre, et al. v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., et al., No. 17-02162, E.D. La., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62364).



Judge Denies Remand After Finding Crane Co. Raises Colorable Federal Defense
BALTIMORE - Testimony from experts in support of Crane Co.'s claim that it followed precise government specifications in manufacturing its valves and that the U.S. Navy would not have permitted additional warnings suffices to keep the asbestos case in federal court in Maryland, a judge held in denying remand May 5 (John C. Dugger Jr., et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Cop, et al., No. 16-3912, D. Md.).



Alleged Asbestos Exposure From Navy Prototype Sufficient For Removal, Judge Says
LOS ANGELES - An asbestos-insulated working prototype of a U.S. Navy nuclear propulsion system constitutes military equipment on which removal to federal court may be based, a federal judge in California held May 1 (Wayne Yocum, et al. v. CBS Corp., et al., No. 17-1061, C.D. Calif.).



Expert Index
PLAINTIFF