Subscribe: RealClearPolitics - Articles - Howard Husock
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade C rated
Language: English
credit markets  credit  income  interest rates  interest  lending  loans  low income  low  markets  mortgage  rates  risk  subprime 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: RealClearPolitics - Articles - Howard Husock

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Howard Husock

Last Build Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:10:27 -0600

Copyright: Copyright 2007

Subprime Lending Worth Keeping

Sun, 11 Mar 2007 00:10:27 -0600

The politicians--notably the head of the Senate Banking Committee, Senator Dodd of Connecticut -- are casting the problem as one of "predatory" loans and are seeking new regulation. Instead, the situation should be understood this way: Both banks and lower-income consumers are getting used to a new financial world, where those formerly shut out of credit markets are now included, but at interest rates that reflect their risk. If we want poorer households to manage their money and assets better, we have to be prepared for them to make some mistakes, and not hurry to overprotect them. I first encountered discussions of predatory and subprime lending four years ago when I visited the office of a community organizer for the nonprofit mortgage lender Neighborhood Housing Services of Chicago, in a neighborhood famous for community organizing called the Back of the Yards. The young man I met was outraged over the increasing numbers of defaults and foreclosures there. He detailed the situation: aggressive mortgage brokers offering low-income homeowners the chance to buy houses with little or no money down, or to refinance their mortgages in order to get cash; those loans sold and resold to major national financial institutions, and high numbers of mortgage delinquencies and defaults. In some ways, the organizer had discovered the obvious. Mortgages today are not held by those who "originate" them; they're "securitized" -- folded into bond offerings designed to reduce the risk of any one loan going bad. So it is not surprising that small loans from the Back of the Yards would wind up being owned by JP Morgan Chase or Bank of America. Nor is there anything fundamentally wrong with that, unless those who put the loans into securities are overoptimistic about how many will be repaid and leave investors with worthless paper, as is now happening to some. But there were disturbing effects on the neighborhood worth considering. Whole blocks were harmed when individual households got in over their heads financially. Houses whose owners had defaulted on their loans had become drug havens. Otherwise good blocks were pockmarked by homes needing repair. But what, if anything should be done about the problem? Lenders, of course, should have to disclose fully the terms of loans. If a new mortgage sets interest payments so low that homeowners' overall debt will keep increasing even if they make payments on time -- one form of "subprime" loan -- borrowers should be so informed. Abuses notwithstanding, our credit markets today are far better than a generation ago -- when mortgage lending was confined to savings-and-loan institutions limited in the interest rates they could charge. These institutions avoided risks and were said to deny credit to poorer neighborhoods. Congress responded with the Community Reinvestment Act, requiring banks to extend at least some credit to low-income consumers and neighborhoods on the same terms as to other borrowers. But that did not teach bad credit risks how to become good credit risks -- and it made only limited credit available. In contrast, the banking deregulation of the early 1980s changed the mortgage industry completely. Allowing lenders to adjust interest rates to risk has given millions of "subprime" customers access to credit markets and has helped push homeownership rates to a record level, approaching 70%. If lenders were not permitted to adjust rates to risk, they would shy away from higher-risk lending. That's already happened in states which have tried to limit "predatory" loans through legislation -- and found that they risked financial markets avoiding their low-income mortgage markets altogether. Far better to expect that as Americans get used to knowing their credit score and become familiar with various available loans, they will learn from their mistakes and take the steps necessary -- including living within their means -- to get loans on favorable "prime" terms. We also could expect banks and bond rating agencies to gain experience in servin[...]