Preview: Dan Shanoff
And the new hotness is...Quickish!
Last Build Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:13:28 +0000
9/1/15 Quickie: Nine Years Later...
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:59:00 +0000
Nine years ago today, I launched this blog. It came the day after the final edition of the Daily Quickie on ESPN.com, a column I loved writing (and still one of my favorite professional and personal accomplishments).The blog was many things: An outlet for my many enthusiasms, a place to keep writing daily (for a time, even more than daily), my own corner of the media universe.Things have withered in the past year or two (or more) -- Quickish overwhelmed everything, and by the time I sold the company to Gannett, blogging felt less vital to me than participating on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.Anyway, yesterday, I made my next career move -- I have joined Facebook, on the Media team, in the Sports Partnerships group, with a focus on journalists and media companies.Here is what I posted on FB:Thrilled to share the news that I have joined Facebook’s amazing Sports Partnerships team, with a focus on working with sports media folks, particularly journalists and news organizations. From Greenhouse-era AOL to ESPN-dot (and ESPNet-dot-SportsZone!) to founding Quickish and beyond, my journalism career has been defined by a passion to impact every fan’s everyday relationship with sports. Now I get to work across the entire sports media industry with so many talented journalists I admire (whether we personally know each other yet or not). And I am so excited to join a phenomenal company, with brilliant, enthusiastic colleagues, platforms powered by innovation and the biggest, best audience of sports fans in the world. Much more soon, but sports media colleagues -- old, new and to-be-met-soon -- please reach out to me with your ideas. (Everyone who knows me knows I won’t hesitate to do the same.)It is a phenomenal role on a phenomenal team with a phenomenal company working with a phenomenal universe of sports-media people I have gotten to know over the past 20 years.So excited for what's next, and I hopefully will be able to point you to all sorts of great things.-- D.S.[...]
Tim Tebow and the Philadelphia Eagles
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 17:22:00 +0000
Previously, on Dan's obsession with Tim Tebow: 1,000+ posts about the Tebow phenomenon from 2009-2012 at TimTeblog.com. With that as context, a handful of thoughts about Tebow signing with the Eagles
*Chip Kelly is smarter than you, armchair NFL expert. From the start, Tebow has needed a coach who is innovative (and fearless) enough to deploy him in individual high-leverage situations.
*That means on the goal line, 4th/3rd/2nd/1st-and-short and as a 2-point conversion specialist (which might just become the next important NFL position).
*I think that "QB continuity" -- that a starting QB has to play every single snap, otherwise his fragile mind and team chemistry would implode -- is more likely orthodox pap than not.
*I hope Kelly's intention is to test out the potential of that as a schematic inefficiency -- at a minimum, I love the idea of the 2-point conversion specialist.
*There is no downside to bringing him in, if you don't care about the media hysteria (and Kelly doesn't).
*Peter King will define a lot of the conventional wisdom
on this: "Let’s be real about what this is: It’s a trial. It’s a chance. It’s a coach who doesn’t care about the distraction of having Tim Tebow in his camp, because he thinks Tebow might help his team."
*Sports media pre-emptively complaining about the media coverage is slightly disingenuous: For starters, a lot of fans genuinely care (out of curiosity, schadenfreude or other).
*And, consequently, it's worth pointing out that Tebow coverage generates a ton of online traffic (or TV/radio ratings) -- I don't see anyone sending those page views back.
*Good perspective from Adam Schefter: "Let's stop with this Tim-Tebow-in-Philly-is-a-media-circus" idea. The whole league is a media circus."
*Related: I'll wager that Tebow's Eagles jersey is a Top 5 seller for the NFL in May, right up there with Winston, Mariota, Cooper and Gurley.
*Curious: He can't wear No. 15 (retired by the Eagles for Steve Van Buren) or No. 5 (retired for Donovan McNabb). This is new territory. Available QB options are 9, 11, 12, 17 or 18.
*May just need to dust off TimTeblog.com for this run.
4/15 Justified Quickie
Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:04:00 +0000
Terrific series finale for Justified last night
, which finishes its run as one of the best TV dramas of all time. I'd put it in my personal Top 10 of the "post-Sopranos" era.
Last night after it was over, I tried to force-rank my list, but it was too hard, so here are 10 that make the cut, in no particular order:
Breaking Bad, Justified, The Shield, The Wire, The Americans, GOT, Friday Night Lights, Battlestar Galactica, Deadwood and...
I'm going to leave that 10th spot open, recognizing that I have yet to list Mad Men or Sopranos or Lost or Oz.
The Americans and GOT, of course, are still ongoing -- it's a testament to both (particularly The Americans, which I particularly enjoy) that they crack the list before their full run is even close to done.
Otherwise: Pretty compelling final night of regular-season NBA coming up tonight. Going to dip my toe back into daily writing, btw...
Monday 2/2 Super Bowl Hangover Quickie
Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:40:00 +0000
*The decision not to give the ball to Marshawn Lynch is the worst play call in the history of pro football.
*It's been a while since I went full-blown "instant history/hysteria," so it's nice to stretch my legs a bit. (That makes me more productive than Marshawn Lynch on the Seahawks' last offensive play of the season.)
*The justification for the "Worst. _____. Ever." siren is the combination of the stakes (Super Bowl championship), the moment (come-from-behind TD, virtually the final play of the game, coming after one of the greatest catches in NFL history) and the context (would have denied the Pats a title), the context (would have won a back-to-back title for Seattle) and the context (Lynch is the NFL's best RB).
*It's not enough to say "Worst play call in Super Bowl history" -- because it is the Super Bowl, that makes it vastly bigger than if the play call happened in, say, Week 6 (or even an earlier playoff round). It is the context that justifies the superlative.
*Looking for a reasonable/rational defense of the play call? Vox outlines a good one
, but it comes with a worthwhile caveat about over-thinking it. (Let's also say that Malcolm Butler made a phenomenal play -- if that ball drops for an incompletion, it's very likely Lynch runs it in on one of the next two plays, and the history of the NFL is altered. That Butler was an undrafted rookie makes it all the more incredible.)
(Update: As always, read Bill Barnwell for a measured take on the situation
*All in all, it was as entertaining of a Super Bowl as you could have asked for.
*Postscript: The ads. It was basically a given that Budweiser would run away with the ad title
, but improbable that Nationwide would be the ad "everyone is talking about," if only because of how grim it was. Personal favorite: Always' #LikeAGirl ad. (Notable: There were a LOT of "dad ads" -- I liked the Toyota Camry one. The Nissan one didn't speak to me at all.)
Tuesday 1/13 Ohio State Champs Quickie
Tue, 13 Jan 2015 18:14:00 +0000
*First of all: I was totally wrong about Ohio State's worthiness for the college football playoff. Full stop.
*Urban Meyer is a Hall of Fame strategist and motivator. Obviously, I loved him when he was at Florida. I didn't sour on him like many Florida fans when he ended up at OSU -- I'm a long-time OSU-loather, so I disliked his location, not the coach. Also, you just knew he'd have OSU in position to win a title sooner rather than later -- ... yup. Three career titles is just a start, and there is no reason why Ohio State won't win next year, too. Prohibitive favorite, no matter who is at QB....
*But that is a fascinating question, isn't it? Cardale Jones had arguably the greatest season by a starting QB in the history of college football. He certainly had the best three-game stretch, a cannon-armed, fridge-sized load (ESPN's Tommy Tomlinson wins, for dubbing him a "vending machine"). He was the perfect QB for the past two games for Ohio State.
*And yet! JT Barrett was all-Big Ten (even better than preseason all-Big Ten QB Braxton Miller) and is arguably a better fit for Meyer's offense than Jones. Not "arguably" -- when given a choice earlier this season, Meyer picked Barrett over Jones and didn't look back.
*Returning to a favorite theme of mine: Jones should turn pro
, not just because he can (which is always a pretty good reason to do it), but because he should -- he isn't getting more NFL-prepared from another season at Ohio State (and certainly not if he is subordinated to second-string). He will be a better NFL QB if he is taught by NFL QB coaches and participating in an NFL system. At the very least, he will make some money, both from his NFL contract and the inevitable endorsement deals that will come from being a favorite of LeBron James. And, oh yeah, he seems to have the biggest arm in college football -- even if no one knew it until a few weeks ago. (He won't turn pro, obviously, but it's a very interesting discussion, I think.)
*In the end, the inaugural College Football Playoff was a raging success. Just enough controversy about the selection process, which then played out epically with the controversial 4th team steamrolling the reigning SEC juggernaut, then the reigning nouveau-riche program (featuring the Heisman winner and presumptive No. 1 overall pick of the NFL Draft), which itself had steamrolled the unbeaten defending champs and its own former Heisman winner/presumptive top-ish draft pick.)
*Looking ahead to the 2015 playoff foursome, an early prediction: Ohio State, Oregon, Alabama, TCU.
Friday 1/2/15 College Football Playoff Hangover Quickie
Fri, 02 Jan 2015 15:10:00 +0000
The inaugural college football playoff went better than I think anyone could have ever imagined:
*The defending (unbeaten) champ was vanquished in a fashion we haven't seen in a college football championship situation in 20 years (Tommie Frazier runs over Florida in 1995).
*The dynastic program (and conference) was vanquished by a team that many/most argued didn't even deserve to be in the field, coached by a conference ex-pat.
*It's as much -- possibly more -- about the losers (Florida State, Alabama) as it is about the winners (Oregon, Ohio State). Both games were amazing to watch.
*As many have pointed out, in the absence of the 4-team playoff, we would have gotten FSU and Alabama for the title -- this makes last night's outcomes even more amazing.
*And now we have "How Do You Stop the Ducks?" versus "Sure, Keep Doubting the Buckeyes."
*It seems like it'll be Oregon in a rout -- the inevitable conclusion to the Ducks' manifest destiny. But if Ohio State can out-muscle Alabama, there is certainly a "why not?" to the game.
*And we have the end of the mythology of the SEC -- certainly the 2006-2014 version. Critics of the SEC's haughtiness will point to New Year's Day 2015 for years.
*And we have the start of a glorious new era in college football, with a playoff system that produced drama-infused games and highly entertaining outcomes.
*I'll give the last word to Spencer Hall, who had a wonderful morning-after homily about what happened last night
"This all happened in the same day, and let's never do this any differently, college football."
14 Great Sportswriting Reads for 2014
Tue, 23 Dec 2014 14:05:00 +0000
Back during the Quickish Era, my favorite thing was the year-end "best-of" sportswriting list -- the first one was in 2011 ("Quickish 11 for '11"), and it proved pretty popular...not to mention enjoyable to prepare.You can't find that original list anymore, but the tradition lives on in '14. And the underlying sentiment extends into another year: Sportswriting has never been better.To be sure: "14" is an absurd, artificial constraint; there are many more worthy entries*, as my overworked browser tabs and gut-busting Pocket account indicate.Still, here are 14 of my favorite pieces of sportswriting this year -- listed alphabetically by author.Katie Baker, Grantland: "The Cold Never Bothered Him Anyway" Chris Ballard, SI.com: "Twilight the Saga" Jane Coaston, EDSBS: "On Women and Sports" Bryan Curtis, Grantland: "Travonte's Party" Steven Godfrey, SB Nation: "Meet the Bag Man" Spencer Hall, SB Nation: "The Istanbul Derby" Amanda Hess, ESPN.com: "Just Cheer, Baby" Greg Howard, Deadspin: "The Big Book of Black Quarterbacks" Sarah Marshall, The Believer: "Remote Control" Brian Phillips, Grantland: "Diamonds in the Rough" Paul Sonne and Anton Troianovski, Wall Street Journal: "Here's the Skinny on NBC's Olympic Latte Secret" Louisa Thomas, Grantland: "Together, We Make Football" Wright Thompson, ESPNFC.com: Sketches from the World Cup Don Van Natta, ESPN.com: "Jerry Football" * - Again, "14" is a dumb constraint and I lament the things I don't include as much as I enjoy the things I do. Here are a few under "Also Receiving Votes":Chris Ballard, SI: "Haverford Oops"Flinder Boyd, Newsweek: "The Birdman's Vengeful Ghost"Flinder Boyd, FoxSports.com: "Run and Gun" Jeremy Collins, SB Nation: "13 Ways of Looking at Greg Maddux"Kathy Dobie, GQ: "The Undefeated Champions of Defeat City" Jason Fagone, Grantland: "Dropped" David Fleming, ESPN.com: "Nothing to See Here"Eva Holland, SB Nation: "Wilderness Women"Jesse Katz, LA Magazine: "Escape from Cuba" Michael Kruse, SB Nation: "The Right Thing To Do Vs. The State of Florida" Erik Malinowski, FoxSports.com: "Pitchman"JR Moehringer, ESPN.com: "The Final Walk-Off" Brian Phillips, Grantland: "Sea of Crises" Alan Seigel, Sports On Earth: "Sabre Rattler"Susan Shepard, SB Nation: "Double T's Last Ride"Wright Thompson, ESPN.com: "Portrait of a Serial Winner"Wright Thompson, ESPN.com: "Section O, Row 61" Tommy Tomlinson, ESPN.com: "You Can't Quit Cold Turkey"Wells Tower, GQ: "Who Wants to Shoot an Elephant?" Seth Wickersham, ESPN.com: "30 Yards and Cloud of Dust"And please feel free to tweet at me (@danshanoff) with any of your particular favorites. For other great year-end lists, check out these collections from Longreads, Longform, SB Nation, FoxSports.com's Erik Malinowski and ESPN's Kevin Van Valkenburg, and subscribe to Van Natta's weekly "reads" newsletter. Also, if you're curious, here is a link to last year's "13 for '13." Finally, sincere thanks for your support of this newsletter this year. Subscribe here.[...]
12/08 Monday Quickie
Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:19:00 +0000
*Alabama, Oregon, FSU, Ohio State
: I'm with Spencer Hall on this
*Madison Bumgarner is SI Sportsman of the Year
: No quibbles. (Only because THE event of 2014 was the World Cup, I would give runner-up to Tim Howard.)
: The Super Bowl pairing is coming from the Pats, Seahawks and Packers.
*The two college hoops wins from the past week that I'm filing away for March
: Duke over Wisconsin in Madison and Arizona over Gonzaga in Tucson.
*On a personal note
, I am so saddened by the death of Olivia Barker
, a standout USA TODAY reporter who was my journalism "protege" (as we liked to joke) back in high school. My deepest condolences go out to her family, friends and colleagues -- and especially her husband and 5-year-old son.
12/07 Final CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 07 Dec 2014 14:54:00 +0000
OK, so Alabama and Oregon are obvious for the college football playoff foursome.FSU gets my vote - as much as I'd enjoy the schadenfreude - because I can't fathom an unbeaten defending national champ not making the playoff field. That's three.That fourth spot -- the one that's going to get decimated by Alabama -- should not be Ohio State.The Big Ten was a farce this season, and Ohio State lost to Virginia Tech, barely a bowl team. It's the worst loss among playoff contender resumes.So it's down to TCU and Baylor, which is nearly impossible.TCU has a slightly better overall resume; Baylor beat TCU head to head.Here's where I net out, and I'll admit it's simplistic: What's the point, if the tiebreaker for extremely similar resumes isn't "Well, who won when they played each other?"I know Baylor has engaged a PR firm -- to much derision -- to help lobby their case. That was a waste of money. I think it's a very simple message: "We played a playoff game with TCU and won."(And I know I am clearly not discounting nearly enough that Baylor beat TCU in Waco, not in Fort Worth or on a neutral field. This wasn't a true playoff between the teams, like we got with Alabama-Mizzou, Oregon-Arizona, Ohio State-Wisconsin or FSU-Georgia Tech. TCU, of course, should simply sit tight with "You're right, Committee: Resume matters.")Foursome I'd pick:(1) Alabama(2) Oregon(3) FSU(4) BaylorBut if the committee goes with TCU over Baylor, I won't be outraged. (Personally, I'd rather see TCU play Alabama or Oregon than see Baylor play Alabama or Oregon.)I will be slightly more outraged if the committee decides to sidestep "TCU vs. Baylor" entirely and goes with Ohio State. That's just a cop-out, because OSU's resume is so flimsy.And if they keep TCU and take Ohio State over FSU, I will merely chuckle at the inanity of it all. Ohio State fans in 2002 sure had no problem with "close wins in games they probably should've lost."Foursome I think WILL be picked:(1) Alabama(2) Oregon(3) TCU(4) FSU*I think the committee will punish Baylor for its seemingly soft strength of schedule (nevermind that Ohio State's CONFERENCE schedule was a joke).*I can't see a scenario where they drop TCU from 3 to "out" after TCU destroyed a team they needed to destroy.*I can't see a scenario where the committee excludes an unbeaten defending national champ for a team from a mediocre conference with a really ugly loss on their resume. (But it could happen!)A few takeaways:*This is still way better than a "clean" two-team decision that would have left us with Alabama and Oregon and not even a nominal discussion about the others. (Except maybe regional outrage about snubbing an unbeaten defending champ.)*The problem with the "four team" solution isn't the argument at the margin; it's the way it basically locks in at the top. Here's what I mean:If you give Alabama and Oregon and even Urban's Ohio State (in a Big Ten year that isn't beyond mediocre) an annual mulligan for that one fluky loss -- rather than having that fluky loss seemingly derail their title chances -- that will be three of your four playoff teams almost every year, short of FSU going unbeaten and crashing the party (which is unlikely in non-Jameis years). The worry is less about "Who gets snubbed?" than creating an enduring (and boring) three-team playoff oligopoly of Alabama-Oregon-Ohio State, thanks to a system that offers a built-in mulligan.*We're getting an 8-team playoff sooner than you think.*As always, post-selection sound and fury will signify nothing, and we'll all settle in for the novel three-game process to determine a national champ, of whom we will all universally recognize.-- D.S.[...]
12/01 Monday Mania Quickie
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:35:00 +0000
*If the college football season ended today (only one more week to say that!), my playoff foursome would be: Alabama, Oregon, Florida State and TCU.
*If Baylor throttles Kansas State, I could see them jumping TCU. Have a hard time seeing Ohio State with a QB3 beating Wisconsin. The SEC has cannibalized itself.
*Absolutely on board with everyone else saying that yesterday's Pats-Packers game will end up being prelude to a Super Bowl rematch.
*I'm ready for the Johnny Manziel Era in Cleveland.
*Hard not to imagine that Will Muschamp ends up as defensive coordinator at Auburn. (And probably too much to hope that Ole Miss' Hugh Freeze ends up at Florida.)
*Love Mo'Ne Davis being tabbed as SI for Kids' Sports Kid of the Year. (She's arguably worthy of Sports Person of the Year for Sports Illustrated, full stop.)
*By the way, SI For Kids is a phenomenal magazine. Not a great magazine -- a phenomenal one. If you have kids, it's a must-have.
*Great news for my friends at SB Nation and Vox Media about their big new funding round
*This Chris Rock Q&A
is as good as folks are saying.
11/24 Monday Monday Quickie
Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:48:00 +0000
*Yes, that Odell Beckham Jr. catch
WAS the play of the year in the NFL and a wildly fun time on the internet last night.
*You can already see it coming: The CFB Playoff Committee will snub Mississippi State
for "regional balance" -- probably Ohio State. Nevermind that the Big Ten is terrible this season.
*Look at the Red Sox: Hanley!
And maybe Sandoval! (I'm not sure I'd pay Hanley that much money, but Sandoval feels like a solid pick-up.)
*My Wizards beating the Cavs on Friday night
wasn't the revelation (although it was extremely fun to watch); it was my Wiz beating the Bucks the next night, a game they historically always lose.
*So intrigued by ESPN's over-the-top play
with the Cricket World Cup. It'll be very successful, I'm betting. (But what does that even mean? I'm actually not so sure.)
*For those wondering why media companies have never created a successful social platform
, I would ask them to remember that fantasy sports (via ESPN, Yahoo and CBS) have been pretty successful as social platforms. (If you want to quibble that ESPN's platform was built by Starwave, a hybrid media-technology company, I'll take your point - I lived it - but Starwave was closer to a media co than not.)
11/16 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 16 Nov 2014 13:56:00 +0000
Four-team playoff if the season ended today
*TCUIt's hard for me not to give a second spot to an SEC team
-- Mississippi State lost by 5 on the road at Alabama, the best team in the country. (It is crazy to think that Georgia is a confounding loss to Florida away from absolutely being in the playoff mix.)The other contenders are flawed
: FSU had trouble with Miami. TCU had trouble with Kansas, for god's sake. (Baylor beat Kansas by 46.) Oregon's best resume fodder (Arizona St) just lost to Oregon St. But if all three win out, they're in; they control their own fate.Baylor and Ohio State are theoretically in the mix
, but including them would undermine any claim that the playoff committee values "strength of schedule."The murkiness at the top is (probably) good for the sport
-- the only constant is that Alabama still rules. (And giving them a once-a-season mulligan only tilts things in their favor more.)Next week's most consequential game
: (The schedule sure doesn't look promising. Then again, you could have said the same thing about this week, except for the Alabama-MSU game.) Two other notes
*Northwestern shocks Notre Dame in South Bend
: The Wildcats' 1995 win there was the most meaningful sports event of my lifetime. This one was not nearly as unlikely, but still -- extremely unlikely. It's a season-maker for Northwestern and an indictment of ND (and FSU?)
: As someone who loves superlatives, being able to watch (or flip over to) a player setting the single-game rushing record was pretty awesome. What Wisconsin has done at running back over the past 20 years is remarkable.Enjoy a high-quality NFL Sunday.
11/09 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 09 Nov 2014 13:41:00 +0000
If the season ended today:
With FSU at No. 5. (Obviously, that's an "at least for me" projection -- FSU is in the Top 4 "for real" until/unless they lose, which they aren't/won't.)
I suppose that if you wanted to expand it a bit, you'd say that the fairly clear-cut playoff foursome is:
*Mississippi State-Alabama winner next week
(but MSU could still lose to Ole Miss and Alabama could still lose to Auburn).
, presuming a win over Duke (!) and Florida (!!).
, which should roll through the rest of the season.
, presuming a win over Arizona State in the Pac-12 title game (although that win at home over Michigan State suddenly isn't as amazing as it was last week).
And, consequently, my preseason scenario plays out:
The Playoff Committee gets the "regional balance" it so desperately wants, more than anything else.
In the process, the committee snubs the SEC by penalizing its runner-up for playing a schedule far more difficult than the one faced by other contenders.
11/02 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 02 Nov 2014 13:07:00 +0000
That Ole Miss ending
They are as good of a 2-loss team as you will ever find, and if schedule strength really mattered to the playoff selection committee Ole Miss (lost by 7 points combined AT LSU and AT Auburn) would qualify for 5th place, which is entirely ceremonial.If I had a playoff committee vote this week
(1) Mississippi State
(4) Kansas State-TCU winnerLet's be real: There is no way Florida State isn't No. 2
in the next playoff seeding, and they have a clear path to an unbeaten season and a cakewalk into the playoff. Hope they enjoy it.
A quick word about Florida romping Georgia
: In 13 seasons as a Florida football fan, I have never been so gobsmacked over a result.Today's best in the NFL: Broncos-Patriots
, obviously. Everything else is fantasy fodder.
10/26 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:22:00 +0000
Loving the 9:30 NFL Kickoff as a novelty. Wouldn't necessarily want this as a West Coaster every weekend...
*Here's my playoff foursome:
Here's why I cannot fathom including Oregon but not Ole Miss -- Ole Miss just lost on the road to a ferocious team (that is particularly ferocious at home); Oregon lost at home to a flimsy Arizona team, giving up points left and right.
Here's why I cannot fathom including Michigan State but not Alabama (or Ole Miss) -- strength of schedule. I give MSU credit for playing Oregon tough on the road (but not as tough as flimsy Arizona, apparently), but Michigan State's conference schedule is a joke.
Here's why I cannot fathom including Florida State but not TCU -- strength of schedule, again. FSU has a single marquee win, over Notre Dame (barely, and that was in Tallahassee). TCU had trouble with two of the nation's best offenses, and otherwise has seen much tougher comp.
If Oregon, Michigan State and Florida State are going to be dropped into the Playoff Foursome just because of their W-L record and gaudy numbers against flimsy opponents, can we skip any pretense that "strength of schedule" matters?
I would love the SEC to go back to my old proposal that they abandon the national college football playoff system, create their own 8-team, 3-round playoff and sell the TV rights for billions.
Friday 10/24 End-of-Week Quickie
Fri, 24 Oct 2014 13:30:00 +0000
: This bums me out tremendously. Nash is one of my favorite NBA players of all time, and it's a shame this is a lost season. Is it too much to hope he can recover over the year and get one last productive year?
*Manning to Sanders, Manning to Sanders, Manning to Sanders
: The way Manning distributes TDs is part of his brilliance -- but not so great if Julius Thomas is on your fantasy roster.
*CFB Saturday: Mississippi State at Kentucky
screams "trap game" (so does Ole Miss at LSU -- not quite as much, but it's still on the table). The rest of the slate is largely inconsequential.
*Tim Hudson making his first-ever World Series start
: Nice milestone. Game 3 isn't a deal-breaker for the losing team -- just one more twist in a solid (if not spectacular) series.
*Your best game of NFL Week 8
: Eagles at Cardinals. Other interesting storylines: Seahawks reach "must-win" moment? ... Ravens at Bengals ... If the Falcons lose at home to the Lions to drop to 2-6, does Mike Smith lose his job on Monday? ... Zach Mettenberger Mania.
Enjoy your weekend!
Sunday 10/19 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:41:00 +0000
So we're down to two teams that control their own playoff destiny: The SEC champ (presumably from the SEC West) and Florida State.
The other two slots?
Well, if resume matters, one should almost assuredly be the SEC West runner-up -- but don't discount the Playoff Committee's commitment to the false equivalency of "geographic balance."
The two one-loss conference champs with the best shot at running the table are Oregon and Michigan State. A one-loss Big 12 champ would have a gripe (especially
K-State), but good luck with that.
Imagine a 1-loss Auburn with wins over Alabama, Ole Miss, Georgia and Kansas State (but a loss to unbeaten Mississippi State) being left out for an Oregon team that lost to Arizona or a Michigan State team that played the flimsiest conference schedule we've seen in years.
The upshot: The SEC West will continue to clobber itself -- seemingly for a single playoff spot -- while FSU cruises on a weak schedule right into a guaranteed playoff slot.
10/12 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 12 Oct 2014 12:27:00 +0000
*Mississippi State and Ole Miss are the top 2 teams in college football, and I cannot fathom how a voter would rank FSU ahead of either, given the "who'd ya beat?" and "how'd ya beat 'em?" tests.
*With Arizona's loss late last night and the other results, there are now just three teams that control their own playoff destiny:
- The Ole Miss/Miss St winner.
- The FSU/ND winner (next week).
Baylor still plays at Oklahoma and versus Kansas State, with a trap game at West Virginia next week. Given that it took a 21-point 4th-quarter comeback yesterday to beat a very good TCU team, I have little confidence they will go unbeaten.
Ole Miss still has to play Auburn (Nov. 1). Mississippi State still has to play Alabama (Nov. 15). And, of course, they still have to play each other in the regular-season finale.
But let's stipulate that the SEC West champ gets into the playoff, with no-matter-how-many-but-assume-one loss.
Let's stipulate the FSU-ND winner goes unbeaten and is in the playoff.
Let's stipulate that of one-loss conference champs, Oregon and the presumptive one-loss Big 12 champ have the inside track at the other two playoff spots.
But let's also stipulate that, this season, a one-loss SEC West runner-up
would have a far more impressive resume than any of those three teams.
Let's say the first half of this season holds and that SEC West champ turns out to be the Ole Miss-Miss State winner and the SEC West runner-up turns out to be that game's loser:
I cannot imagine that the playoff committee would be interested in an Egg Bowl rematch as a playoff semifinal, a month after the teams have played a "decisive" game (although they should!)
What is endlessly fascinating is that this college football season hinges on the two national powerhouses from Mississippi -- the top 2 teams in the country.
(P.S.: As Bradley Beal is my favorite NBA player, yesterday's news of his broken wrist -- putting him out for at least two months -- is depressing, yet so familiar for any hard-luck Wizards fan.)
10/05 CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:38:00 +0000
Submitted while trying not to think about last night's 18-inning Nats loss...From Oregon's late-night loss to Arizona on Thursday to UCLA's late-night loss to Utah early this morning -- with losses by Alabama, Oklahoma and Texas A&M -- this was as voluminously wild of a week of Top 10 upsets as we've seen in years, if not ever.(That doesn't even count Wisconsin or USC - who were already out of the playoff discussion but experienced shocking losses, relatively for the Badgers and absolutely for the Trojans - or LSU and Stanford, who lost to still-in-the-playoff-mix teams.)There is a single clear controls-their-own-destiny playoff scenario left - if ridiculously tenuous:(1) SEC champ.(2) Unbeaten FSU-ND winner.(3) Unbeaten Baylor-TCU winner.(4) Unbeaten Arizona. That's it -- and the chances that next week's Baylor-TCU winner runs the table is meh (Baylor still has to play Oklahoma, TCU still has Oklahoma State and Kansas State), and Arizona going 13-0? Please.And so we are left with the idea that as long as everyone is losing, then many of the losers still at least have a shot. That's not entirely true. It's a small pool of eligible candidates:Presuming Arizona will still choke away at least one regular season game (if not more), Oregon is not finished.And it seems totally absurd that a 1-loss SEC (West) runner-up would be ineligible, simply because the Playoff Committee wants the false equivalency of regional balance in its first playoff field.Let's digress about the SEC for a sec: Mississippi State throttling Texas A&M (my pick as the No. 1 team going into yesterday) followed by Ole Miss's stunning win over Alabama was as exciting as it gets for back-to-back games on a Saturday afternoon.If the season ended today, based on resume, I'd have both Mississippi teams in my playoff:(1) Mississippi State(2) Ole Miss(3) Auburn(4) TCU Of course, that's not how it works.The SEC West now becomes a round-robin thresher: Mississippi State playing Auburn, Ole Miss playing Auburn, Mississippi State and Ole Miss playing each other, with Alabama cranky and still good enough to spoil Mississippi State or Auburn's season and with Texas A&M cranky and still good enough to spoil Ole Miss or Auburn's season.Consider next week's SEC schedule: Auburn at Mississippi State and Ole Miss at Texas A&M. Setting aside the fact that those games are harder than any single game any of the non-SEC playoff "contenders" will play this season -- let alone next week -- yet are part of a standard gauntlet for contenders in the SEC West, that's like a de facto playoff. (Although let's just stipulate that even if the SEC champ - presumably from the West - finishes with one loss, it is guaranteed a playof spot.)Layer in that TCU plays at Baylor in a de facto playoff playoff -- the winner retains "control-their-own-playoff-destiny" status -- and that Arizona could easily lose to a ticked-off USC that can feel entitled to hate anything related to the State of Arizona (yuk yuk) -- and next week could see at least four Top 10 teams (and four off the quickly dwindling list of playoff contenders) lose.It's glorious.Look: We could still end up with a reasonably projectable playoff field of the SEC West champ (with however-many losses), unbeaten FSU, unbeaten TCU and WHYTHEMNOTUS (say, Oregon).But we'll always have yesterday, when the long-held physics of college football -- particularly down in Mississippi -- were upended.-- D.S.[...]
10/3 Oregon Whoa Quickie
Fri, 03 Oct 2014 12:18:00 +0000
Just like that, the college football playoff landscape is a mess.
Yesterday, it was all so clean: The four playoff teams would be the SEC champ (presumably unbeaten), unbeaten Florida State, unbeaten Oklahoma and unbeaten Oregon.
Now, Oregon has a playoff-killing loss on its resume -- at home, against an Arizona team that is undefeated but hasn't been all that impressive this season (but clearly has Oregon's number). Even if it runs the table and wins the Pac-12 title, its argument (and resume) is less strong than, say, a 1-loss SEC runner-up (if still stronger than Michigan State).
Look ahead: The SEC champ is in. Unbeaten FSU is in. A presumably unbeaten Oklahoma is in.
The fourth spot is now up-for-grabs among several would-be 1-loss teams: Pac-12 champ Oregon? Big Ten champ Michigan State (which lost to Oregon)? A 1-loss SEC runner-up in a year when the playoff committee will be focusing as much on regional diversity as picking the four "best" teams?
And that's all before Saturday's shake-out: Either Texas A&M or Mississippi State will be knocked out. Either Alabama or Ole Miss will be knocked out. LSU could absolutely beat Auburn. Notre Dame could (should?) lose to Stanford. Nebraska will be knocked from the unbeatens by Michigan State. And Oklahoma -- looking at a clear path to the playoff after last night -- could absolutely lose to TCU, which would make things even messier.
If you thought a playoff would make things less contentious, Arizona's seismic upset at Autzen in the middle of the night is a good reminder that it will be even more so this year than ever.
PS: Hard not to root for the Royals to dispatch the Angels.
9/29 Fire Hoke Quickie
Mon, 29 Sep 2014 17:30:00 +0000
I'm still digesting the experience from the past few days at the Online News Association conference, which I'll hopefully have more to say about in the next day or two. Until then, a few faves:*Everyone calling for Michigan to fire Brady Hoke today. A few representative samples: MGoBlog's Brian Cook ("Brady Hoke should have been fired walking off the field"), MaizeNBrew's Drew Hallett ("The Fireable Offense of Brady Hoke") and my USA TODAY Sports colleague George Schroeder ("The situation is beyond salvage.") It's not that he has to go at the end of the season -- he has to go right now. His pathetic explanations -- and the even more pathetic statements from the school -- are making things worse.*The Nationals' no-hitter: I can't count how many baseball games I have been to in my lifetime, but I can count how many my kids have been to -- seven, including yesterday, when my dad took them to the Nationals' season finale, which everyone assumed would be a pro forma walk-through before the team heads into the playoffs. It ended up being one of the defining games of the Nats' franchise history in DC. (If I couldn't be there, it's nice to know that at least my kids got to see it in person.) Meanwhile, talk about mis-managing expectations: Forget winning the NL pennant -- I'll be bummed if this team doesn't win the World Series.*Teddy Bridgewater: Instant sensation. (So of course he suffers that ankle injury -- but that's temporary; he's going to be good for a long time. Watch highlights here.)*Steve Smith Sr.: Doing it for the Olds! (Enjoyed this on Smith from Grantland's Andrew Sharp.)*JR Moehringer on Derek Jeter: My favorite of the many (many) things written about Jeter this past week. Click here - it'll take you 15-20 minutes. (I'm not much of a Jeter fan -- certainly not a Yankees fan -- and, still, that final at-bat on Thursday night was a bonafide sports Moment.)*Matt Norlander on this past Saturday's 20th anniversary of the release of Dave Matthews Band's "Under The Table And Dreaming": I was 21 and not only in college, but in a fairly typical fraternity, so obviously I have vivid memories of this particular CD, which was ubiquitous. As Norlander notes, that is hard to reconcile with the polarizing opinions about DMB now, but at the time? Whew.@SportsREDEF: Jason Hirschhorn's REDEF empire (and you should absolutely be subscribing to the MediaREDEF email newsletter) expands into sports, first with a Twitter handle, very soon with its own daily email.*Re/Code's Kara Swisher: I tweeted about this on Friday from the ONA conference (and will have more later this week), but having been a longtime follower and fan of hers, this was the first time I had ever seen Swisher in person, and it is an understatement to say she is a dynamo. Airport issues kept her from showing up until all but the final few minutes of her assigned panel (on news start-ups, obviously a subject near and dear to me), and she blew the doors off from the second she bounded up the stage stairs and started talking. What an inspiring force of personality.OK, quick related aside: On Friday night, we were walking in the same direction on the street (I was maybe 10 feet behind her), and I found myself having an internal debate ("Should I go up and introduce myself? How weird/off-putting, because she doesn't know me. But she would never hesitate to do it, if things were reversed and she wanted to talk to me. But still: I'm[...]
9/28 Sunday CFB Hangover Quickie
Sun, 28 Sep 2014 18:20:00 +0000
Just got back from a few days in Chicago at an industry conference, so bear with me as I catch up...
The most important story in college football yesterday, by far, is the deplorable, FIRING-WORTHY conduct by Michigan coach Brady Hoke, who not only left in a player who obviously had a concussion, but he re-inserted the player later in the game.
In the most charitable interpretation, Hoke is so clueless that he shouldn't be a college football head coach; in a less favorable interpretation, he abdicated his core responsibility, disqualifying him for the role -- not at the end of the season, but today.
It compounds Hoke's mistake if the AD doesn't do anything about it. It compounds Hoke's absence of leadership that not a single assistant coach felt compelled to overrule the head coach's decision.
The editors of MaizeNBrew -- who care about the issue far more than I do -- have the best take on it
*Legitimately stunned that Northwestern won at Penn State.
*Entirely unsurprised that Arkansas would simply try to run it up the gut on their final, futile play of the game.
*FSU has lost whatever air of invincibility it carried into the season.
*If the playoff was today:
(1) Texas A&M
Oklahoma is on the outside looking in, with FSU next to OU. A&M's win over South Carolina at South Carolina suddenly doesn't look so impressive, given Mizzou was able to do the same thing.
*Next week's best: Arizona-Oregon on Thursday, Alabama at Ole Miss, LSU at Auburn, Texas A&M at Mississippi State, Oklahoma at TCU, Stanford at Notre Dame, Nebraska at Michigan State, Utah at UCLA -- that's as loaded of a weekend as you could want, with all of the would-be playoff contenders with resume-making (or season-breaking) tests. Hard to say what, but SOMETHING interesting is going to happen. At a minimum, I think Notre Dame and Nebraska take losses and, consequently, exit any shot at the playoff. I could see Oklahoma getting stymied at TCU. And of the three big SEC games, I don't see any upsets, but LSU-Auburn will be a slugfest.