Subscribe: RealClearPolitics - Articles - Nidra Poller
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade C rated
Language: English
civilian  eaters  editors  israel  israeli  lethal narratives  lethal  lotus eaters  lotus  narratives  train  understand  war  washington editors 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: RealClearPolitics - Articles - Nidra Poller

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Nidra Poller

Last Build Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:29:04 -0600

Copyright: Copyright 2007

Lotus Eaters

Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:29:04 -0600

It happens that Haniyeh's apology for jihad terrorism in sheep's clothing appeared on July 11th, just as Bombay was hit by multiple train attacks that killed over 190 civilians in an operation tragically similar to those perpetrated in Madrid and London...and coming soon to your local train station. Haniyeh's sinister taqqiya was published on the eve of an unprovoked Hizbullah attack on Israel's northern border. While rockets fired from Lebanon and Gaza were wreaking havoc on civilian targets, Haniyeh was given prime space to denounce an Israeli "aggression under false pretenses." According to the Hamas PM the June 25th Palestinian cross-border attack was in fact an Israeli ploy: "The 'kidnapped' Israeli Cpl. Gilad Shalit is only a pretext for a job scheduled months ago." Whereas the civilian casualties falsely attributed to Israel are proof of inhumanity: "Was Israel defending itself when it killed eight family members on a Gaza beach last month or three members of the Hajjaj family on Saturday, among them 6-year-old Rawan?" We can easily imagine what motivates a Hamas chief to twist the facts. But what motivates Washington Post editors? Why would they grant implicit legitimacy to dishonest arguments that justify unprovoked aggression against Israel, formulated by a leader of an organization dedicated to the extermination of Jews? We can call the editors all kinds of names: Leftwing traitors, deluded pacifists, jihad fellow travelers, pro-Palestinian fashion victims, whores wriggling for Arab money. But it won't satisfy the intellectual--and strategic--need to understand what motivates this inexcusable abuse of press freedom. We have to understand why seemingly rational journalists could in all sincerity commit an unforgivable sin against the very foundations of our nation. What is the mechanism that allows Washington Post editors to not only observe but report on concrete facts and still not understand that we are at war because war is being waged against us, and we must win because if we lose Washington DC will look like Mogadishu? They are lotus eaters, and the lotuses they swallow are lethal narratives, and what prevents them from seeing the enemy at our gates is that these lethal narratives are both the weapon and the war, the WMDs of the war they cannot recognize. In the story they tell we have not been attacked; we have been simply reminded of our guilt by the downtrodden we mercilessly persecute. The shahids who blow themselves up on Israeli street corners, the "insurgents" who knock off a few dozen Iraqi civilians per day, the great train robbers who demolish hundreds of lives in a few minutes, the "spiritual leaders" who inject death wish into the very wombs of mothers, the reality show beheaders, the 9/11 demolition crews, all of these grim reapers are, to the clouded minds of the lotus eaters, the voice of the oppressed appealing to our humanitarian conscience. They want peace and justice. But the armed-to-the-teeth Israelis and the gun slinging Americans have spoiled the heady dreams of one world, one deep sigh, one true embrace. Whether the attacks are civilian planes against the WTC or inhuman bombs in Jerusalem buses the lotus eaters will never admit that these acts of war are the cause of whatever reaction follows. Lethal narratives are crude and slipshod but they lock into post-modern minds where cause and effect waver on a sliding scale; everything is moveable. Those evil planes streaking through a clear blue sky were not the beginning of something, they were the last act of legitimate exasperation: the victims of injustice, colonialism, neo-colonialism, capitalism, globalization, and racism who had tried in vain to make their grievances heard through the usual channels, finally resorted to this desperate gesture, which we must strive to understand. The same mechanism allows the New York Times to justify its orgy of revelation of military secrets that endanger our troops in action. By claiming that Bush lied and dragged us into an illegal war journalists not only soothe their c[...]