Subscribe: RealClearPolitics - Articles - John Leo
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade C rated
Language: English
age  cultures  human sacrifice  human  kind  multicultural  museum  people  progress  rothstein  sacrifice  show  societies  term  word 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: RealClearPolitics - Articles - John Leo

RealClearPolitics - Articles - John Leo

Last Build Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:34:49 -0600

Copyright: Copyright 2008

Dark Night at the Museum

Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:34:49 -0600

Unlike most such offerings, the Field show is at least straightforward about its bias: "It is important to remember that there is no best or model culture. All cultures are equally valid to the individuals living in them." This, of course, requires explaining away Aztec human sacrifice, the elusive triple axel of multicultural performance. The show helpfully points out that ancient Rome killed a lot of people in ceremonies too.

According to Rothstein, the show breezes past the indigenous commitment to ritual slaughter by referring to it as "bloodletting" and also by contracting the term "human sacrifice" down to "sacrifice." (A similar bit of verbal gymnastics is currently under way. "Female genital mutilation," a frankly polemical-- and accurate-- term is often replaced by the bland word "cutting," so as not to seem offensive to the mutilators.) The vague and generic term "sacrifice" allows the perpetrators of the show to point out that "sacrifice and religion are linked in many societies" and "almost all world religions include sacrifice of some kind." Yes, but how many, exactly, imitate the Aztecs by ripping out the beating hearts of 20,000 people a year?

Caught in a defensive crouch, the show has to argue the good points of the old cultures--"hunting and gathering was a great way to live" and usually provided more leisure time than farming, and in this culture women and the elderly were respected. (Farming cut leisure and respect? Then why do it?) Among the early peoples of southern California, between 7000 BC and 1600 AD, harpoons and ocean-worthy canoes were invented. Rothstein hurls the obvious grenade at these two achievements: "The more compelling fact might be that during those 9000 years so few brilliant techniques appeared: it was a period when other societies developed science, writing and medicine."

This kind of assessment is considered improper in light of the multicultural cant that has leached out of the academy into the schools, the museum world and much of the media. Not only is the word "primitive" verboten, but so are once conventional references to Stone Age, Bronze Age and Iron Age because they imply that some cultures are better than others and that progress is real. If progress isn't possible, Rothstein asks, what about "the moral progress represented by modern Western societies' finding the brutality of the Spanish conquerors so repellent?" Congratulations to Rothstein for an outstanding article.