Subscribe: RealClearPolitics - Articles - Janice Shaw Crouse
http://realclearpolitics.com/articles/rss_janice_shaw_crouse.xml
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade C rated
Language: English
Tags:
brought  civil rights  civil  equal  founding fathers  fruit  king  life  movement  revolution  revolutions  rights  struggle  war  years 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: RealClearPolitics - Articles - Janice Shaw Crouse

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Janice Shaw Crouse





Last Build Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:06:30 -0600

Copyright: Copyright 2007
 



The Uncertain Fruit of Revolutions

Mon, 03 Jul 2006 18:06:30 -0600

The war for independence itself was characterized by more retreats than victories. The uncertainties of what would follow the war are best understood by noting the outcomes of other revolutions. For example, the French Revolution, which occurred just a few years after the conclusion of our own. It brought on 1793's Reign of Terror, during which thousands of citizens -- suspected of harboring the wrong sentiments -- were put to death by the guillotine. Little wonder that by the end of that century, Napoleon was able to seize power. But far from ending the bloodshed, his conquests saw upwards of a million French soldiers die in battle or from other war-related causes. A historical parade of "bad" revolutions, which brought even more disastrous loss of life, followed: Russia, China, Cambodia, to name a few. Reaping freedom from a revolution is a perilous endeavor. The military leadership that makes for a successful revolution is usually not the best-suited to establish a government that will ensure the liberty of the people. George Washington, first among the Founding Fathers, deserves enormous credit. As one historian put it, "If Washington would not be king, no one could be king." Those who signed the Declaration of Independence and framed the Constitution understood the perils of power and did their best to set up a system of government that would give us the best odds of escaping the emergence of a despotic governmental regime. I say "best odds" for there were no guarantees then, nor are there now. It is doubtful that the Founders fully comprehended what they were assenting to when they affirmed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." From the vantage point of history, they clearly were planting seeds that would eventually bear the fruit of a civil war that would root out slavery from this country. The price would be horrendous. Better than 600,000 men, Union and Confederate, would die in that bloody conflict -- more than died in World Wars I and II combined. From 5,000 to 7,000 died in the Battle of Gettysburg alone. What the signers did perceive were their grievances as free men who had been subjected to tyranny by the King of England. To throw off his rule, they pledged one another their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honors. In less than 50 years, the ideals inspiring this revolution would morph into the Abolitionist Movement and bring yet more struggle and division. The ultimate fruit of the war was the end of slavery and the beginning of one hundred years of additional struggle to gain equal civil rights for Black Americans. As that struggle was reaching it apex with the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act, another revolution was beginning. Mario Savio and others at the University of California at Berkeley were launching what became known as the Free Speech Movement. Its content was equal parts radical leftist ideology and sexual liberation, with a huge helping of vulgar, obscene profanity. Careful examination of their rhetoric in light of the realities of their time suggests that, unlike the Founding Fathers, the tyranny they perceived was less a matter of their circumstances than simply their outlook on life. The sexual revolution that came into full flower beside the Marxist-fueled anti-war movement during the second half of the 1960s brought with it a host of pathologies. Idealistic rhetoric (most of it only a matter of slogans to the average undergraduate) was and still is used to try to dignify what happened during this period. But the driving force behind the radical groups that sprung up right and left was simply an immature anger. The youth sought a cause to justify their desire to rebel, and to mingle it with the forbidden pleasures of drugs and sex. As these forces came together, an explosion of hedonism was unleashed on campuses and ubiquitous rock concerts, such as the infamous Woodstock Festival in 1969. The burn[...]