Subscribe: Comments for GayPatriot
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade A rated
Language: English
comment condemn  comment  condemn racists  freedom  racists –  socialists  violent socialists  violent  – violent   
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments for GayPatriot

Comments for GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Last Build Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:56:38 +0000


Comment on Peaceful March on Google, postponed after Alt Left threats by Sean L

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 09:56:38 +0000

@ Ted B.: That's unfortunate about your sister. Do you have to deal with her often?

Comment on Alphabet Soup by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 08:54:45 +0000

@9 At this pace, soon, we're going to start finding subsequences of decimals of Pi in their it's-aliiiiive!-super-uber-duper-inclusive-and-all-that gender-spectometric acronym.

Comment on Alphabet Soup by MaryB

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 07:32:02 +0000

When the citizens are divided into smaller and smaller groups, they become more more easily controlled by the government(s).

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 06:48:54 +0000

There can be no doubt that most of those in the democracies who demand a central direction of all economic activity still believe that socialism and individual freedom can be combined. Yet socialism was early recognized by many thinkers as the gravest threat to freedom. It is rarely remembered now that socialism in its beginnings was frankly authoritarian. It began quite openly as a reaction against the liberalism of the French Revolution. The French writers who laid its foundation had no doubt that their ideas could be put into practice only by a strong dictatorial government. The first of modern planners, Saint-Simon, predicted that those who did not obey his proposed planning boards would be "treated as cattle." [...] To allay these suspicions and to harness to its cart the strongest of all political motives—the craving for freedom—socialists began increasingly to make use of the promise of a "new freedom." Socialism was to bring "economic freedom," without which political freedom was "not worth having." To make this argument sound plausible, the word "freedom" was subjected to a subtle change in meaning. The word had formerly meant freedom from coercion, from the arbitrary power of other men. Now it was made to mean freedom from necessity, release from the compulsion of the circumstances which inevitably limit the range of choice of all of us. Freedom in this sense is, of course, merely another name for power or wealth. The demand for the new freedom was thus only another name for the old demand for a redistribution of wealth. The claim that a planned economy would produce a substantially larger output than the competitive system is being progressively abandoned by most students of the problem. Yet it is this false hope as much as anything which drives us along the road to planning. Although our modern socialists' promise of greater freedom is genuine and sincere, in recent years observer after observer has been impressed by the unforeseen consequences of socialism, the extraordinary similarity in many respects of the conditions under "communism" and "fascism." [...] The relative ease with which a young communist could be converted into a Nazi or vice versa was well known, best of all to the propagandists of the two parties.The communists and Nazis clashed more frequently with each other than with other parties simply because they competed for the same type of mind and reserved for each other the hatred of the heretic. Their practice showed how closely they are related. To both, the real enemy, the man with whom they had nothing in common, was the liberal of the old type. While to the Nazi the communist and to the communist the Nazi, and to both the socialist, are potential recruits made of the right timber, they both know that there can be no compromise between them and those who really believe in individual freedom. What is promised to us as the Road to Freedom is in fact the Highroad to Servitude. For it is not difficult to see what must be the consequences when democracy embarks upon a course of planning. The goal of the planning will be described by some such vague term as "the general welfare." There will be no real agreement as to the ends to be attained, and the effect of the people's agreeing that there must be central planning, without agreeing on the ends, will be rather as if a group of people were to commit themselves to take a journey together without agreeing where they want to go: with the result that they may all have to make a journey which most of them do not want at all. Democratic assemblies cannot function as planning agencies. They cannot produce agreement on everything—the whole direction of the resources of the nation-for the number of possible courses of action will be legion. Even if a con[...]

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 05:39:35 +0000

@1 Amen bis repetita. Here's another 2 minute-long paraphrase: Collectivism vs Inalienable Individual Rights

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Hanover

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:46:17 +0000

I think the fact that ILC has had to say this, delineate it as an American, says quite a bit about the status of the Left's anti-Americanism. Things are way beyond just not ::respecting:: the Constitution & the values of our Society. We are indeed, already in civil war. Pick your targets wisely, watch out for scouts. Protect & preserve. It's a good time to show your quality.

Comment on Alphabet Soup by Hanover

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:27:48 +0000

#7, Cyril, The Canadians seem to be in competition with US Liberals already. Apparently, the Ontario gays are pacified by what appears to be someone who had a stroke at the keyboard. I'm thinking their elementary school teachers need to be tested for drugs. I had no idea they drank so much wine at lunch! I'm sorry; I just don't think the empty-headed bubble brained gays are even going to appreciate this & trying to get tots to identify sexual concepts about nuts & bolts is a non-starter. Not every country outside the US is filled with people ready to dump a bunch of hormones in their children's spaghetti ohs the first time they play with an opposite sex doll in the nursery.

Comment on Alphabet Soup by Blair Ivey

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 03:18:29 +0000

@ RSG: The Democratic Party would cease to exist if only 'sentient bengs' were allowed to marry. Sentience requires sel-awareness, and that's inconsistent with a philosophy that requires willfull denial of reality. There are many examples among fauna of intelligence without sentience: perhaps some humans have the same deficiency.

Comment on Tech CEO Boots Site for “Abhorrent Content,” Then Laments Internet Censorship by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:54:19 +0000

... from his infrastructure and only that.

Comment on The Democrats’ New Besties by Ted B. (Charging Rhino)

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:48:22 +0000

One of these things, the Antia emblem, is just like the other, NSDAP-SA emblem.

Comment on Tech CEO Boots Site for “Abhorrent Content,” Then Laments Internet Censorship by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:46:23 +0000

* it’s his very right to ban whatever content he doesn’t like

Comment on Tech CEO Boots Site for “Abhorrent Content,” Then Laments Internet Censorship by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:44:46 +0000

Anything happening in private is fine with me, as long as it doesn't infringe on someone's inalienable rights. What this hypocrite idiot CEO doesn't understand is it's very right to ban whatever content he doesn't like from his infra(structure) -- as long as the Daily Stormer remains free to go find someone else more tolerant to whatever is their stuff about, to do business with -- But, no, of course he had to invoke the ultimate man made power of law to enable his own discriminatory worldview to infringe on other people's inalienable rights.

Comment on The Democrats’ New Besties by Ted B. (Charging Rhino)

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:38:23 +0000

The vast bulk of the Alt-Right's and the Alt-Left's stupids and useful dupes have no idea what a "fascist" is., ...or was. Both received their useful political education watching Hogan's Heroes and the Indiana Jones movies. It may be an inconvenient truth, but the ANTIFA are the progressive Left's Sturmabteilung; by ideology, by tactics, and by direct action. ...Including the drinking and hot bi-bro sex.

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Ignatius

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:38:12 +0000

Missouri state sen. Maria Chappelle-Nadal has posted that she hopes Trump is assassinated. Some have called for her resignation.

Comment on The Democrats’ New Besties by Cyril

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:32:50 +0000

@3 I know. We may just be missing somethin'

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Sean L

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:05:21 +0000

That this needs to be a post is a sad commentary on the times...

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Matthew the Oilman

Fri, 18 Aug 2017 00:14:03 +0000

Never thought that you approved of Nasty Nazis,Kooky Klansmen or Crazy Commies, but maybe you had to put it out for little letter mike' s benefit. As repulsive as I find those organizations, I am equally nonplussed by the people who wish to outlaw them. Who gets to decide who is , the news media, scary stuff. I would be content if we could arrange a Final Battle between all 4 of these loathsome groups in the superdome, but that would be unchristian of me.

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by salg

Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:59:33 +0000

I did agree with you that discrimination is stupid and wrong. discrimination is freedom, it is the right to make a choice. if you have no right to choose you have no freedom. in this country we say that some reasons for making a choice will not be allowed because they conflict with equal protection of the law. i.e. the civil rights act. but to say that any discrimination is wrong is saying that you are opposed to freedom. that is why the left always says it is opposed to discrimination because leftists are opposed to freedom. and leftists(democrats)are not opposed to racial discrimination otherwise we would never have affirmative action laws that deny whites the protection of the civil rights act to not be discriminated against because of the color of their skin.

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Steve

Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:55:18 +0000

CTRL-ALT-Left Antifa smashing car windows killed the cat lady CNN blamed TRUMP See 5 sec before (((FAKE-NEWS))) car video at VDARE Narrative Collapse Moslem motorist mows down dozens= moderate moslems fear backlash of tomorrows terror attack

Comment on We condemn racists – and violent socialists by Steve

Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:52:52 +0000

I came here to post about the TB scare going on in San Fran. Its possible for TB to be spread to the penis, & also a possibility of it being spread by oral sex. Given how many refugees rent boys have TB, flavored condoms would be advised for our community that thinks PREP solves everything.