Subscribe: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
http://plato.stanford.edu/rss/sep.xml
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade A rated
Language: English
Tags:
bibliography  entry  main text  main  markets  revised entry  revised  september main  september  set  text bibliography  text 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy



This channel provides information about new and revised entries as they are published in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.



Published: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:26:40 -0800

Last Build Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:26:40 -0800

Copyright: Copyright Notice. Authors contributing an entry or entries to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, except as provided herein, retain the copyright to their entry or entries. By contributing an entry or entries, the author grants to the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University an exclusive license to publish their entry or entries on the Internet and the World Wide Web, including any future technologies or media that develop to supplement or replace the Internet or World Wide Web, on the terms of the Licensing Agreement set forth in http://plato.stanford.edu/info.html. The rights granted to the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University include the right to enforce such rights in any forum, administrative, judicial, or otherwise. All rights not expressly granted to the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University, including the right to publish an entry or entries in other print media, are retained by the authors. Copyright of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy itself is held by the Metaphysics Research Lab at Stanford University. All rights are reserved. No part of the Encyclopedia (excluding individual contributions and works derived solely from those contributions, for which rights are reserved by the individual authors) may be reprinted, reproduced, stored, or utilized in any form, by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including printing, photocopying, saving (on disk), broadcasting or recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, other than for purposes of fair use, without written permission from the copyright holder. (All communications should be directed to the Principal Editor.)
 



Moral Particularism

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:20:34 -0800

[Revised entry by Jonathan Dancy on September 22, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Moral Particularism, at its most trenchant, is the claim that there are no defensible moral principles, that moral thought does not consist in the application of moral principles to cases, and that the morally perfect person should not be conceived as the person of principle. There are more cautious versions, however. The strongest defensible version, perhaps, holds that though there may be some moral principles, still the rationality of moral thought and judgement in no way depends...



Scottish Philosophy in the 18th Century

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:02:26 -0800

[Revised entry by Alexander Broadie on September 22, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Philosophy was at the core of the eighteenth century movement known as the Scottish Enlightenment. The movement included major figures, such as Francis Hutcheson, David Hume, Adam Smith, Thomas Reid and Adam Ferguson, and also many others who produced notable works, such as Gershom Carmichael, Archibald Campbell, George Turnbull, George Campbell, James Beattie, Alexander Gerard, Henry Home (Lord Kames) and Dugald Stewart. I discuss some of the leading ideas of these thinkers, though paying less attention than I otherwise would to Hume, Smith and...



William Whewell

Fri, 22 Sep 2017 17:13:52 -0800

[Revised entry by Laura J. Snyder on September 22, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] William Whewell (1794 - 1866) was one of the most important and influential figures in nineteenth-century Britain. Whewell, a polymath, wrote extensively on numerous subjects, including mechanics, mineralogy, geology, astronomy, political economy, theology, educational reform, international law, and architecture, as well as the works that remain the most well-known today in philosophy of science, history of science, and moral philosophy. He was one of the founding members and a president of the British Association for the...



Étienne Bonnot de Condillac

Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:55:38 -0800

[Revised entry by Lorne Falkenstein and Giovanni Grandi on September 21, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html] Etienne Bonnot, Abbe de Condillac, was the chief exponent of a radically empiricist account of the workings of the mind that has since come to be referred to as "sensationism." Whereas John Locke's empiricism followed upon a rejection of innate principles and innate ideas, Condillac went further and rejected innate abilities as well. On his version of empiricism, experience not only provides us with "ideas" or the raw materials for knowledge, it also teaches us how to focus attention,...



Thomas Paine

Tue, 19 Sep 2017 23:39:03 -0800

[Revised entry by Mark Philp on September 19, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Thomas Paine was a pamphleteer, controversialist and international revolutionary. His Common Sense (1776) was a central text behind the call for American independence from Britain; his Rights of Man (1791 - 2) was the most widely read pamphlet in the movement for reform in Britain in the 1790s and for the opening decades of the nineteenth century; he was active in the French Revolution and was a member of the French National Convention between 1792 and 1795; he is seen by many as a key figure in the emergence of claims for the state's responsibilities for welfare and educational provision, and...



Arguments for Incompatibilism

Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:49:33 -0800

[Revised entry by Kadri Vihvelin on September 18, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] We believe that we have free will and this belief is so firmly entrenched in our daily lives that it is almost impossible to take seriously the thought that it might be mistaken. We deliberate and make choices, for instance, and in so doing we assume that there is more than one choice we can make, more than one action we are able to perform. When we look back and regret a foolish choice, or blame ourselves for not doing something we should have done, we assume that we could have chosen and done otherwise. When we look forward and make...



Medieval Theories of Analogy

Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:16:37 -0800

[Revised entry by E. Jennifer Ashworth on September 15, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Medieval theories of analogy were a response to problems in three areas: logic, theology, and metaphysics. Logicians were concerned with the use of words having more than one sense, whether completely different, or related in some way. Theologians were concerned with language about God. How can we speak about a transcendent, totally simple spiritual being without altering the sense of the words we use? Metaphysicians were concerned with talk about reality. How can we say...



W.E.B. Du Bois

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:58:57 -0800

[New Entry by Robert Gooding-Williams on September 13, 2017.] William Edward Burghardt Du Bois (1868 - 1963) believed that his life acquired its only deep significance through its participation in what he called "the Negro problem," or, later, "the race problem." Whether that is true or not, it is difficult to think of anyone, at any time, who examined the race problem in its many aspects more profoundly, extensively, and subtly than W.E.B. Du Bois. Du Bois was an activist and a journalist, a historian...



Innateness and Contemporary Theories of Cognition

Wed, 13 Sep 2017 19:25:03 -0800

[Revised entry by Jerry Samet and Deborah Zaitchik on September 13, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html] Nativism and Empiricism are rival approaches to questions about the origins of knowledge. Roughly speaking, Nativists hold that important elements of our understanding of the world are innate, that they are part of our initial condition, and thus do not have to be learned from experience. Empiricists deny this, claiming that all knowledge is based in experience. Different Nativist and Empiricist views spell out the details in different ways, depending on which elements of our knowledge are at issue, what counts as understanding, what is meant by...



Alternative Axiomatic Set Theories

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:18:25 -0800

[Revised entry by M. Randall Holmes on September 12, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] By "alternative set theories" we mean systems of set theory differing significantly from the dominant ZF (Zermelo-Frankel set theory) and its close relatives (though we will review these systems in the article). Among the systems we will review are typed theories of sets, Zermelo set theory and its variations, New Foundations and related systems, positive set theories, and constructive set theories. An interest in the range of alternative set theories does not presuppose an interest in replacing the dominant set...



Plato's Ethics and Politics in The Republic

Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:00:13 -0800

[Revised entry by Eric Brown on September 12, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Plato's Republic centers on a simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? The puzzles in Book One prepare for this question, and Glaucon and Adeimantus make it explicit at the beginning of Book Two. To answer the question, Socrates takes a long way around, sketching an account of a good city on the grounds that a good city would be just and that defining justice as a virtue of a city would help to define justice as a virtue of a human being....



Markets

Fri, 08 Sep 2017 18:13:54 -0800

[Revised entry by Lisa Herzog on September 8, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography, notes.html] Markets are institutions in which individuals or collective agents exchange goods and services. They usually use money as a medium of exchange, which leads to the formation of prices. Markets can be distinguished according to the goods or services traded in them (e.g., financial markets, housing markets, labor markets), according to their scope (e.g., regional, national, international markets), or according to their structure (e.g., competitive markets, oligopolistic markets, monopolistic markets). From a normative perspective, markets are of...



Epistemic Paradoxes

Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:29:00 -0800

[Revised entry by Roy Sorensen on September 7, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Epistemic paradoxes are riddles that turn on the concept of knowledge (episteme is Greek for knowledge). Typically, there are conflicting, well-credentialed answers to these questions (or pseudo-questions). Thus the riddle immediately informs us of an inconsistency. In the long run, the riddle goads and guides us into correcting at least one deep error - if not directly about knowledge, then about its kindred concepts such as justification, rational belief, and evidence....



Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy

Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:17:14 -0800

[Revised entry by Henrik Lagerlund on September 7, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] The notions of mental representation and intentionality are intrinsically related in contemporary philosophy of mind, since it is usually thought that a mental state has content or is about something other than itself due to its representational nature. These notions have a parallel history in medieval philosophy as well, but it has been intentionality that has attracted medieval scholars' attention (for example, in Knudsen 1982, Pasnau 1997, Perler 2001 and Perler 2002). There have only been a few studies on mental representation (Tweedale 1990, Pasnau 1997, King 2007 and Lagerlund...



Leibniz on Causation

Wed, 06 Sep 2017 17:39:24 -0800

[Revised entry by Marc Bobro on September 6, 2017. Changes to: Main text, Bibliography] Substances, according to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646 - 1716), always act; furthermore, since even finite, created substances are naturally indestructible and thus immortal, substances continue to act forever. To what or to whom do substances causally owe their action? In Leibniz's day, this question more or less becomes a question about the causal role of God. Is God the only genuine causal agent in nature? Or does God's causal contribution, at least in the ordinary development of nature, consist "merely" in the...