Published: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:06:55 GMT
Last Build Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:21:48 GMT
Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:06:55 GMT
Read this piece about whether Medium is good for us. I changed the headline because what the author assumes is something I question.
It's true that a bunch of really good writing flows through Medium. But that may not be, long-term, a good thing, if Medium doesn't last.
One of the things they don't list in their principles is the idea of creating a record. I assume they thought of it, to me it's paramount, but it's their weak point. In fact it's the weak point of the entire web.
It's like the line people have about terrorism. The terrorists have to be right once, we have to be right 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, forever.
Archives have to be strong to survive over time.
If we want to create lasting knowledge, we have to do a lot better than we are doing. And Medium, while it is a nice editor, and it's free to use, is a step in the wrong direction. If Medium fails, and we have no idea how they will not fail, nor do they, it will take all the ideas people have poured into it with them.
If we want to be able to create knowledge that can be learned from, built upon, studied, years from now, we have to stop and think about what we're doing. Because we are not doing that now.
I urge Ev in his re-think of Medium to add survivability of the writing as one of the core values. If nothing else, strive to create a record.
Mon, 23 Jan 2017 03:49:02 GMT
Sun, 22 Jan 2017 15:50:27 GMT
Trump was a free man until he took the oath.
But once he assumed the office, and until he leaves, he belongs to us, the American people. I'm sure this is a new feeling for him. But we all must submit to something. The president submits to the people.
But he will keep bumping up against the reality that now, we own his ass, even the ones who thought his campaign was crazy and dangerous. The people who voted for him thinking it left the rest of us powerless are in for a surprise too. The other politicians you elected care about what we think, because they need us to keep their jobs. The election is over, now they're worried about the next election. And like it or not, they need us.
Harry Truman famously called the White House the "crown-jewel of the federal penal system."
I don't know how Trump will come to terms with this. We have an idea of what a president does, says, how he or she reacts to events. We just had eight years with a guy who never lost his cool over anything. The new president sees a report on TV saying he lost the MLK bust in the Oval Office and he freaks out? He has a long way to go before he is our president. He may hold the office but he hasn't embraced it yet.
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 17:23:07 GMT
Why shouldn't the @natlparkservice tweet independently of the White House?
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:18:55 GMT
My friend Chuck Shotton posted on Facebook yesterday "I bet the sun still comes up tomorrow." That inspired a fantasy.
Yes, and our alien overlords will reveal their existence in huge flying saucers that obliterate the sun over Washington DC, Moscow and Beijing. The overlords emerge and take over, imprisoning the leaders of all countries, and the CEOs of Google and Facebook. The world rejoices.
It will turn out that Trump was right, Obama is an alien, just a different kind than he thought. The knowledge won't do him any good, though, because he will spend the rest of his life at forced labor on a tiny planet in a far away galaxy.
Rich Siegel, another friend from the Mac dev world of the 90s said "From your your lips to God's ears." I hear that a lot these days. :balloon:
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 15:10:26 GMT
Fri, 20 Jan 2017 18:23:57 GMT
One minute podcast.
If you see something online that shocks you, don't fall for it.
Don't pass it on.
This is a very dark confusing time, perfect season for all kinds of trolling.
Don't fall for it.
Don't pass it on.
Fri, 20 Jan 2017 17:53:38 GMT
A new media type has emerged on Twitter, a quote.
A publication uses a quote from a story, along with a headline and a link to the story, to inform. It's a form of advertising, doing what RSS readers do, in new, visually interesting ways. So I wanted to see if I could get pngWriter to do it, so it wouldn't involve any production work for each item I write. Writers can write and designers design. This was the idea that made blogging work. Separation of form from writing.
At the same time I've had on my todo list to look at envelopes for pngWriter posts. They're little templates that define a rendering for the contents of the editor in pngWriter.
Here are two examples of what I was able to do with it yesterday afternoon in a couple of hours. First a tweet designed to look like a quote published by NPR. And then one to look like it came from the NYT.
The templates for each are just HTML files with a macro to define the placement of the user's text.
Here's an example, the NYT envelope.
It's mostly CSS with a bit of HTML to place the bodytext.
Now the challenge is to design a way of saving and distributing designs so they can easily be shared between designers and writers.
Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:53:28 GMTEverything I read about Trump says he'll do anything he wants, whether it's legal or not, and say that it's legal. This has been his M.O. in private life and people who know him say it's certain that will go with him to the White House.I remember a town hall with Trump voters, just after the election, in Kenosha, a factory town that lost its factory, north of Milwaukee. A Trump voter was sure that checks and balances would stop Trump from doing anything too terrible. It turns out that's not true, and that was knowable before the election, and should have been factored into his thinking. It's especially not true if there's a Republican majority in Congress.In this alternate reality people know the arcane rules of football and basketball better than they know the rules of government. This, in a country that has, if we do our jobs, self-government. We let people tell us it's too complicated, we listened to their confusing lies, and let them confuse us, thus giving them the power to decide for us. All that stands between us and chaos now are the Republican members of Congress, the military and federal police (FBI, NSA, CIA et al). Maybe the courts. Because it's clear the president will do exactly what he wants until someone forces him to stop.Next chapterI'm doing some of the best writing of my life in pngWriter. It's the combination of the Twitter writing ethos, which says typos are okay, and if you're wrong, well there's always another tweet coming up right after this one. Nothing is too important, so that allows you to be breezy here, where writing on the blog is more formal.This works for me. I just copy and paste the finished copy from pngWriter into my blog, edit, link, add a picture and an abstract and publish. It's made my blog writing better. I know people want me to release it. That's great. Hold on to that. My experience with product releases is that people say they're excited, but when it comes time to use the product, they either don't use it, or they abuse it. This does not create an incentive for me to release stuff. I finally decided I had enough of this system. It's amazing in a way that it took me this long. If you want people to develop software in the space between social networks and blogging, we need to get the system operators, the Twitters, Googles, Facebooks, Amazons, etc to participate. They really don't give a shit. Both in appearance and fact. And users have to give a shit too, btw. These networks are our world these days. And they aren't being well maintained. We don't have parks, or places to create and compete. They are stagnant, non-evolving places. They all suck. So how can developers make it better, when you all wallow in the suckage, Really, there's a problem here. Users need to get a sense that they have something at stake, and stop herding to the cheapest most mass systems. Diversify and you will get diversity. And real innovation. Take responsibility for your future, and stop waiting for people to hand it to you. When you do, you get shit.More to come..The word is prideI saw Obama speak twice at the DNC in 2004. I was lucky to be there. Once at the blogger's breakfast. He was presented as the next hot thing in the Democratic Party. I didn't see what the big deal was about. He seemed like a state senator from Illinois. Then he gave the keynote and still, I didn't see anything there. The pride thing finally hit me when he gave the race speech, about his pastor, who said a lot of very true things about America, things that Republicans don't want to hear. But I didn't mind. The thing I felt was pride when Obama explained race from his point of view. Then there were prideful moments again and again, until it became normal, and DC devolved into the crazy that passes for government. I forgot that I was proud of him and us, for him being where he was. Now, on the last day of his t[...]
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 19:22:37 GMT
TL;DR. We might just have lost an election, and perhaps our democracy, because we couldn't be big enough to see that inclusion is an absolute. If you exclude people, then you are not inclusive.
Inclusivity today means creating opportunity for people of color, of certain religions and ethnicities, LGBTQs and women.
Now I voted for Clinton, and I'm scared of President Trump. But I also am a white man. And I want to say something.
Inclusivity is not a zero-sum thing. If you include someone that does not imply that you exclude others. Progressives, of whom I am one, have been just as guilty of zero-sum thinking as the Trumpists.
And imho, Trump got a bunch of votes because inclusivity has become a zero-sum thing among progressives.
An example. I was struck by the tone of an article in today's NYT. It's a story about Republican men, and it's whole point is (again, sigh) how men are wrong. As a man, I can't tell you how tired I am of hearing that. Exhausted. It gives me something in common with the Trump voters.
If you're a woman, I don't think you can hear how often this theme is repeated. But as a man, I hear it all the time. Shut up because you're a man.
A better way to view the world is to find people you can work with, and stop worrying how they got there. You may resent me, but put that aside, and fucking work with me. And go out of your way to include the people you've been excluding, and who you've been condescending to. Listen to your own words and imagine someone saying them to you. If you would find them offensive then don't say them. Learn to be really fully inclusive.
And when you do that, that might give us the margins we need to take back control of the government. A pragmatic result from basically doing what's right. How could that be bad.
I'm going to march with the women on the 21st in NYC but I'm going to wonder if you would march with me if we had a march for men (and know the answer in advance, you wouldn't). Until I feel supported, and loved and accepted, we're still going to be divided. And that division comes from progressives not conservatives. We need to acknowledge that and fix it.
If your reaction is hostile, then imho you're like the people who, when they hear Black Lives Matter say All Lives Matter. You are no better.
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:28:11 GMT
So I spent a couple of weeks over the holidays doing the Listicle software.
Then I made it work from OPML, figuring that I'd get it to tie up to my outliner.
So I looked at building it into the outliner, and sighed, oh man I've been down this road before. Let's do it right, so that I don't have to do this over and over.
So I designed a system that would depend on the existence of a Scripts menu. Unfortunately the outliner didn't have that feature. So I added it. And a couple of users asked for file verbs. And I made the menu hierarchic.
Now I had what I needed. I wrote a menu script that takes an outline and turns it into a listicle. It's just connecting stuff together. There's a small template file, I read it, do some string substitutions, and write it out into the user's space on littleoutliner.com.
The result is this.
Of course I used a Grateful Dead song to create the demo, as I often do, when getting something interesting started. Yes, he's gone, but his music continues to provide good source for demos. :balloon:
PS: I know the rent is in arrears, the dog has not been fed in years...
PPS: If you want to try out the Listicle feature, check out the new howto.
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:46:51 GMT
Suppose the NYT had embraced the idea of users writing stories on nytimes.com, i.e. if they had hosted blogs for people quoted in the Times, an idea I promoted to them in 2002.
Then, I argue -- they would have become Facebook, but better.
Then in 2006, I did a very quick mockup of a river of news with NYT stories, using their RSS feeds, on a Blackberry. It was great! It really worked. So what if it just took me two days to write.
Had the NYT marketed that to its users, there would have been a NYT version of Twitter, which still would have happened, but mobile news would have grown up around the NYT too. Not with them as peripheral to it, subject to the business models of the tech industry, where they are today.
I mention all this not (only) to toot my horn but to say that you have to get out in front of the leading edge to have a place in the future. It's always been thus. Not something noticed by the news industry but true nonetheless. There are things they could be doing now to prepare for today's future, but of course their perspective is fighting battles of today, not creating new media, which is how you remain exciting and relevant.
My two cents of course, YMMV, I am not a lawyer. :balloon:
Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:47:45 GMT
I sent this email to Jeff Barr, a longtime friend who is the chief evangelist for AWS. We go back to the beginnings of RSS. I really want this service, if not from Amazon, possibly from a another vendor? I don't know, but this gap has to be filled by someone. Please!
Ideally, here's how it would work:
I don't want to be in the business of reselling storage.
It seems this is something Amazon could do. I was wondering if you have? There are a lot of services out there, and it's hard to keep up with them all.
I almost said must be Amazon, but I didn't want to cut out other big vendors. But it must come from an entity that can almost guarantee the longevity of the storage service. Nothing lasts forever, and you shouldn't bet on a company to be around indefinitely. But storage is the kind of thing you don't want to take a chance with.
This is all mature technology by now. What we need is a competent operational and financial entity with the legal resources to protect the storage business, if it needs protection. This is almost certainly not the province of a startup or a small company.
PS: I wrote about this on January 5, in a general context, not specifically about Amazon.
Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:15:37 GMT
Right now podcasting is cresting, it's growing, people are talking about it. But podcasting has crested five times, each time bigger than the last, each time new people thinking they were there at the birth of podcasting. This happened with blogging too. It's cool. It's how we build a sense of inclusivity. It's how these thing stay exciting. Constantly re-born, but not really. :balloon:
Blogging and podcasting are the same wave. The reason podcasting booted up so well is we already had the blogging network built. And to this day a blog post is part of every podcast, we call them show notes. That was a conscious decision. You should have something the search engines can find.
The waves will keep coming. Each wave introduces a new combination of basic communication capabilities. YouTube videos are a media type. Facebook videos are somewhat different, and a different media type.
Media types follow a lot of the rules of software objects. They basically are software objects.
So when I say the journalists could let foreign ideas get through more easily, I'm really saying we could do this faster and better. Seriously. Too much gatekeeping holds us back.
A great example. Journalism should have let some new people in to cover the mess with Hillary's email server. One of the reasons it was so confusing is that reporters are so shaky in their understanding of how networks work. So let some techies who can write do the reporting, just temporarily perhaps, but get out of the way, you held us back. And we wouldn't care about access. I don't want to talk with Mitch McConnell or Preibus or any of those guys, ever. That would be like torture.
Mon, 16 Jan 2017 02:03:49 GMT
There's a meme going around, list the top ten albums you listened to as a teen, only one album per group.
I thought at first I would have a hard time thinking of ten albums that meant a lot to me then, even though I remember I listened to a lot of music, and went to a lot of concerts. It was a great time for music, I was born in 1955, so I was a teen until 1974. That covers a lot. But it was hard because I had to figure out which albums to leave off the list. There were a lot of them.
And there were some that I listened to later on, like Frank Zappa's Hot Rats, even though it came out when I was 14. I wanted to put it on the list, but it doesn't fit, because it wasn't until I was in my 20s that Zappa clicked for me.
So here's the list. This is the stuff I really listened to as a teen.
Sun, 15 Jan 2017 15:23:23 GMT
Our incoming government is already playing a dangerous game of brinksmanship and provocative sabre rattling. It seems so unnecessary. It certainly isn't what I want as a US citizen.
But I wonder why China would bother fighting a physical war with the US, when they could wait two years and fight with the Russians in our next election? Seems so much easier, cheaper, less deadly.
For that matter why should North Korea threaten us with ICBMs? Why not just do some hacking, get dirt on the new president, present your demands.
All foreign powers will probably do this. Get in line. Everyone show us the dirt you've got on our commander in chief. Maybe the UN can help us figure out how much each claim is worth.
Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:16:20 GMT
An 11-minute podcast, the first of the year, about two topics that are very related:
I would rally with Graham, against the travesty that the new administration is shaping up as. We can't afford to be picky about who we party with. Just think if you voted for Jill Stein or the Libertarian candidate, if you could go back and change your vote to Clinton, no matter how much it pains you, or if you didn't vote even though you could, would you be willing to compromise or sacrifice to avoid what we're going to go through?
That's my plea in this podcast. We have to build trust among ourselves and unite, and that can be the silver lining to this glorious mess we find ourselves in.
Thanks for listening.
Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:29:59 GMT
This is one of those posts I don't want to write, but now I have to write it. I don't want to write it because I don't want to give anyone any ideas. But there's no avoiding it now.
First, it looks like Zuck is going to run for president. He's already started to campaign. A force because he owns the communication system so many of us depend on.
If you were a Republican money-person would you think, holy shit, I can't buy Facebook, Zuck made sure of that. He owns all the voting shares. So there's no way to do a hostile takeover, even if the price weren't ridiculously prohibitive.
But there is an even more interesting social network whose stock is in the tank, and is wobbling all over the place, and also happens to be the favorite communication tool of the Republican president-elect. Its market cap is $12.39B.
I've asked about this privately among friends who are investment bankers, and they all quote from TWTR's balance sheet. They don't see the upside of Twitter owned as a political tool, as a lever by which to influence, or to compete to run/own the US govt.
And own is the right word. If Trump gets in without divesting, then an election in the future will be more like a corporate merger. The guy who runs the US has no conflict of interest, and can keep his or her investments, they just have to steer clear of emoluments and they're constitutional. I bet Zuck and Bezos have lawyers looking into this. Also Bill Gates, Steve Case, Meg Whitman and Eric Schmidt.
Anyway, all this means the the political landscape in the US has been re-factored and owning a social net will be a big advantage going forward. TWTR is up for grabs even if the balance-sheet analysis says they're a bad deal. Sorry I wish this were not so.
Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:57:50 GMT
This post started in pngWriter.
More speculation. Both Zuck and Bezos woke up and realized Holy shit you can buy the US for a lot less than we have.
Another way of looking at it, the US govt is a bargain.
So Bezos bought a huge party house in the same neighborhood as the Obamas and Ivanka Trump.
He's going to get to know all the congress people and administrators and buy enough to be in position to bid for the 2020 presidency. Funding for that starts immediately if not before. And of course he owns the Washington Post and plans to use it.
Zuck on the other hand owns the Washington Facebook, and every other place as well, which is pretty much as good as the Post for communicating, and you get all those other places for free. And Zuck won't have to pay for the ads. :balloon:
They're probably both kicking themselves for not realizing that they could buy the US so cheap. They're going to have to pay a huge markup now, but it will still be a bargain.
Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:33:06 GMT
I'm using pngWriter again, now that I figured out how to make the text look crisp. See the previous post about pixel ratios. It's almost perfect, and it's made Twitter way more exciting. So if Jack you're listening, do it, it'll make Twitter exciting the way Napster made music exciting. Twitter could use that.
I'm still undecided as to whether I will open this up to the public. I've found with my previous products, all imho excellent, the uptake has been far too small to justify the effort and cost to productize and support them. I need a new approach. Maybe charge people to use it? That way they'll feel like there's some reason to use it. Otherwise if it turns out the way all the other products have, no thanks, I'll just use it myself and share it with a few friends. That makes me happy. Otherwise it's just a lot of work and then a lot of work and more work and the occasional bit of angst from someone who thinks you owe them something. Feh. Who needs it!
I'm starting to feel that way about my website too. There's really no way to easily make it HTTPS, and I know all the arguments, and the proponents of HTTPS have to be the worst listeners I've ever encountered. If they want to break the web and plaster ugly warnings all over my blog, go for it. Have a party. I don't give a shit. I'll keep a copy locally so when I need to refer to it I can. As long as the Mac has a good search, I don't even need Google.
I'm feeling very Fuck You about controlling motherfuckers. Twitter can't help its users communicate. Facebook breaks the web by not letting writers link to other websites from their posts. Google tries to force everyone to switch to HTTPS no matter what the cost. I don't have to do any of this, and neither do you. So when people tell you to fuck off tell them to fuck off right back! :balloon:
Fri, 13 Jan 2017 18:31:28 GMT
I am learning about pixel ratios in HTML canvas elements.
It's why the text in pngWriter looks fuzzy. It has something to do with pixel ratios. I find everything about canvases mind-numbing until I figure it out, then it makes sense. You can see a lot of learning in Little Card Editor, a project that I did a couple of years ago.
Anyway here's a demo app that illustrates how a pixel ratio-aware app is better than one that isn't.
Update: Here's an example of a tweet using the new style of rendering. It does look much more sharp. :thumbsup:
Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:06:10 GMT
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 17:02:13 GMT
I am an ObamaCare user, so I am watching with a huge personal interest in the outcome of the torturous process the Republican Congress is going through to try to "repeal and replace" the program that brought me out of the shadows and finally got me health insurance that I more or less trust.
Before ObamaCare, I had insurance before through a Massachusetts company I started when I lived there, which was the only state that had an ACA-like health plan at the time. The truth is you don't really find out if you have insurance until you need it.
Someone there among the ranks of Republicans hopefully is doing a dispassionate analysis of their options. Throwing me off insurance is going to all of a sudden build a bond between me, a person who has voted consistently Democratic for the last few cycles, and people in their home states who vote Republican.
We're all going to be unified in our hatred of the Republican politicians who used us as pawns to somehow enhance their power. And it won't even do that. This could be the thing that wakes up your "base" and gets them to see that you are not their friend. Because, as someone who is paying attention, it is very clear that you are not.
Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:02:32 GMT
For people who like demos here's a 5-minute video.
How to get started. Create an outline called menubar.opml. The top level items are the names of menus. The sub-items are the commands, and the subs under each command is the text of the script that is run when the command is chosen. You edit everything in the outliner.
When you change the text in the menubar outline, the menus automatically rebuild. You don't have to have menubar.opml open to use the commands. They will always be there when you're using Little Outliner.
As in Fargo, there is a set of functions that are pretty much guaranteed to work across versions of LO2, and you should use those whenever possible to be sure that your scripts continue to work. For historic reasons we call these functions verbs.
I basically copied the verbs that were in Fargo, and commented out the ones that don't make sense in LO2, for example the wordpress and cms verbs.
The file verbs don't work but they might at some time in the future, so I left them in place.
I left the fargo verbs because they do work here, they just get the version and name of the product. In this case they will reflect the version and name of the Little Outliner app. So for example this will work:
dialog.alert (fargo.version ());
Caveat: I did very little testing of the verbs. Some of them will not work because they were specific to the Fargo environment. Use common sense. If you have encountered a verb that does not work that you think should work, report it as a bug in a comment below. Include a bit of script code to illustrate.
Historic note: These verbs came from Frontier, so Frontier programmers will feel right at home.
I've turned comments on for this post so if you have questions you can ask them here.
Update 1/17: More verbs and the menus are now hierarchic.
Wed, 11 Jan 2017 13:34:12 GMT
When I was called for jury duty in 1996 one of the most surprising things was the shift in perspective.
Have you ever driven an English car? Until you sit on the other side, you don't realize how much you depend on the rear-view mirror. Same in a courtroom. On TV your perspective is inside a camera. I'm watching this case from a different perspective. Where's the jury? Uhhh. Wow! It's inside of me.
So when the president-elect asks if we're living in Nazi Germany, I wonder if it has yet dawned on him that he's the only person who can answer the question, really no one else can. And it's something we would all like to know. Mr Trump, do we live in Nazi Germany?