Subscribe: Comments on: Visiting the Village: Episode 34
http://www.mode7games.com/blog/2009/11/26/visiting-the-village-episode-34/feed/
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language:
Tags:
bonus  console  digital distribution  digital  effort  free  game  games  good  ian  make  microtransactions  money  people  service  time 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: Visiting the Village: Episode 34

Comments on: Visiting the Village: Episode 34





Last Build Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:54:29 +0000

 



By: Jaquelyn Throneberry

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:54:55 +0000

I have noticed that over the course of developing a relationship with real estate proprietors, you'll be able to come to understand that, in most real estate transaction, a fee is paid. In the end, FSBO sellers do not "save" the commission payment. Rather, they struggle to win the commission by way of doing a good agent's job. In this, they spend their money along with time to conduct, as best they could, the responsibilities of an adviser. Those duties include revealing the home via marketing, introducing the home to prospective buyers, creating a sense of buyer desperation in order to trigger an offer, making arrangement for home inspections, dealing with qualification inspections with the loan provider, supervising fixes, and assisting the closing of the deal.



By: Lelo sex Toys

Sat, 10 Dec 2011 12:36:33 +0000

Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thanks However I'm experiencing concern with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting identical rss drawback? Anybody who knows kindly respond. Thnkx



By: Music Instrument

Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:33:21 +0000

Generally I don't read post on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very forced me to take a look at and do so! Your writing style has been surprised me. Thank you, quite nice article.



By: BG mail

Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:58:32 +0000

My brother suggested I would possibly like this web site. He used to be entirely right. This put up actually made my day. You can not consider just how a lot time I had spent for this information! Thank you!



By: Odell Clas

Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:19:10 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2IM2ulV53k



By: Alex

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:01:30 +0000

Hmm, rarity collecting. The girl at the bus stop might not care about radiant silvergun, but she will care about my Reebok pump reissues (28 of 29 pairs!). More relevantly i just bought a gamecube and most of the games i wanted on it. it set me back 150 pounds in total, and i got about 11 games, and I'm totally psyched. I completed the twin snakes the other day and had a great time doing so, and that's so rare it costs the price of a new current-gen title (as did twilight princess). My conclusion would be if the enjoyment you get from the game is not just from the rarity then it's fine, but if that's the *only* charm, then it's pretty lame. lols. Ian has definitely got my question right here, but then you've squabbled over the question's steering wheel and crashed it into an unsuspecting cottage. I really dislike them, as there is always song and dance about an extra mission or this or that, and as a regular game preorder..er, I have been consistently let down by the APPALLING quality and all-round lack of effort put into the bonus content. about two years ago it was quite a rarity to see a game with a preorder bonus, but nowadays, it's rare to see a decent sized release without. I definitely like the idea, but when it's used as a cheap hype builder, I think it's a con. I've not had one i've enjoyed, and the red faction walker bonus i unfortunately missed, so my impression is nothing but tacked on tat. I suppose actual physical bonuses like little toys or different boxes are a different matter, but I'm going to have to say that when it comes to bonus downloadable content, I DISLIKE.



By: Paul

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 14:05:31 +0000

2.) Completely agree. 3.) I'm sure Ian will zoom in and land precariously on this discussion soon. I would expect someone who hates podcasts *ON PRINCIPLE* to especially hate our podcast, but it sounds like a fun experiment.



By: Herr_Alien

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:17:48 +0000

@2: games with microtransactions need to be REALLY CAREFULL at what they decide to be on a paid basis and what's free. That is the point that makes a player either enjoy the game or feel like being scammed. For some games (or type of games) it's just easier to draw that line. @3: Ian kept suggesting that its hilarious to consdider that paying for a console will make you the owner of the console. What I tried to strech out is that while you do own the console, yo do not own the service. Microsoft owns the service. As for getting other people in, well, a friend of mine "threatened" he'll cut my internet service if I keep listening to podcatsts and such. I'll see if I can convince him to listen to your show; maybe hearing the familiar accent (he's from UK like you guys) will make him actually listen.



By: Paul

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:48:30 +0000

Wow thanks for the in-depth reply and nice comments as ever Senor Alien! 1. )"It turns the leaderboard into a microtransaction". Nice turn of phrase there. Yes, torrenting is inevitable - I do throw some weight behind the argument that devs shouldn't legitimize the those putting up torrents. As one indie dev put it to me, "I *like* people to know 100% that all torrents of my games are *not* legit, and could contain all sorts of crazy shit." I also think that "heavy" online integration (even for SP games) is the only sane form of DRM available currently. People won't accept anything else...oh, apart from Steam. 2.)Mark Pincus definitely won't be stopped by anything other than a mega lawsuit, that's certain. Those kind of business practises have been around on the internet for yonks and will continue to exist for as long as there are gullible people. On free games and that Gama article: there is definitely a definition problem here. I don't class Runescape as an F2P game - it's a subscription-based game with a big free component. F2P games, in my mind, are games which are COMPLETELY free, but rely on microtransactions and other bullshit to generate revenues. Microtransactions THEMSELVES can be ok, but Ian and I both (I think) feel that the don't lend themselves to interesting game design. The game design HAS to prioritize incentives for the player to buy; it makes money a necessary part of the overall gameplay, and this isn't good for the purity of the design. It CAN and DOES work, and it certainly CAN work economically, but I think, for us personally, we'd have to find a really novel way of using microtrans if we were ever to base a game on that business model. I have a suspicion that microtransactions can only really work in a small amount of games (well, maybe I'm proved wrong by horse armour, one of the greatest microtransactions success stories of all time), and that the F2P model inevitably leads to the alleged Pincus situation. 3.) I think that's basically Ian's point, but I might be wrong! 4.) Yes. Absolutely yes. 5.) I'm not sure that decision was based on *effort* per se. Ha, we'll see about Doomsday. As I've said, I'm just glad the company in this position are Valve and not someone else. 6.) We love Jimi! Thanks for the support, man - tell all of your friends to listen. We need more listeners!



By: Herr_Alien

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:09:10 +0000

Monstruous podcast (in terms of length) deserves a monstruous reply: 1) Regarding torrents, no, it's the best anti-piracy method. It turns the leaderboard into a microtransaction. And as Ian mentioned, its a very good method to advertise. Paul, people WILL torrent. As a developer, you're faced with the decision of either trying to use that to your advantage, or try to fight it. SECUROM, anyone? 2) The Zynga guy got cocky, after running desperate for money for a good time. What I know is that even if Facebook does ditch Zynga, that will not stop the dude to start a new company and do exactly the same thing. 'Free' games can be good: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/4046/what_are_the_rewards_of_.php 3) Ian, no. You bought it, you own it. But! You can't buy the service. If the company that provides the service says it will provide it only for unmodded consoles, then so be it. So yes, mod the console, but at your own risks. 4) When you start selling IPs you will get in situations where you can no longer make a sequel to the game that you used to make. Them money you got for the IP carry a price. 5) @Steam issue: that's competition power. It was a decision made by MW2 developers being full aware of the effects. They choosed the de-facto leader. They choosed simplicity in developing for a 70% majority of digital distribution rather than investing more and more time to cover the full digital space. For them, 70% with minimum effort is better than 100% digital distribution share but much more effort. Steam owning 70% of the digital distribution market is as bad as Google owning the search market and Microsoft the OS market. Yet Doomsday fails to show up. 6) Jimmy, I sense a new 50 Cent in you :), congratulations for winning the competition! You're doing good with the podcast.



By: Paul

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:26:05 +0000

Jimi is a megastar.



By: James

Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:23:32 +0000

The song was a definite highlight of this episode. Does anyone know if Jimmy is signed up to a record label? If not, he definitely needs to consider it!