Subscribe: Kommentare zu: Proposed changes in VIAF RDF
http://jakoblog.de/2011/04/13/proposed-changes-in-viaf-rdf/feed/
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade C rated
Language:
Tags:
agree blockquote  blockquote  jakob  nofollow opinion  nofollow  org  person  public  rel nofollow  rel  uri  viaf  von jakob  von  web  wrong 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Kommentare zu: Proposed changes in VIAF RDF

Kommentare zu: Proposed changes in VIAF RDF



Das Weblog von Jakob Voß



Last Build Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 07:29:47 +0000

 



Von: jakob

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:33:01 +0000

Thanks for the pointer to URI Identity and Web Architecture Revisited!



Von: Ed Summers

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:30:03 +0000

Thanks for the blog post, and continuing to try to orient these modeling discussions around actual use. I just have to say, I totally agree re:
There is nothing wrong in declaring an URI like http://viaf.org/viaf/39377930/ to stand for both a foaf:Person, a rdaEnt:Person, and a skos:Concept.
The difficulty in deciding which URI to use is hard enough with Linked Data, and providing yet more opportunities to pick the wrong one isn't going to help much in my opinion.