Subscribe: Comments on: Does Facebook Social PPC Belong at Search Marketing Conferences?
http://www.aimclearblog.com/2008/05/03/does-facebook-social-ppc-belong-at-search-marketing-conferences/feed/
Preview: Comments on: Does Facebook Social PPC Belong at Search Marketing Conferences?

Comments on: Does Facebook Social PPC Belong at Search Marketing Conferences?



Digital marketing blog for advertising agency, in-house & PR professionals



Last Build Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:43:31 +0000

 



By: Small Business Marketing - Discover where to market!

Sun, 31 May 2009 16:23:06 +0000

[...] Does Facebook Social PPC Belong at Search Marketing Conferences? [...]



By: Interview with Gab Goldenberg, 21 Year Old SEO Consultant of SEO ROI

Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:18:30 +0000

[...] also one of the foremost experts on Facebook PPC to my mind, with Marty of AimClear. If you’re looking to advertise there, I’d hire one of those two depending on whether [...]



By: SEM Means Search Engine Marketing, Not PPC! » aimClear Search Marketing Blog

Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:09:13 +0000

[...] beer. I was impressed by his reverence for our industry’s vernacular while discussing whether Facebook PPC belongs at search marketing conferences. Danny asked “where’s the search box?” “Where are people typing in [...]



By: David Mullings

Mon, 12 May 2008 17:43:09 +0000

I agree that contextual is not "search" and "social ppc" like on Facebook is not search either. It seems that the names of the conferences have become too limiting in and of themselves and as new opportunities arise, they incorporate them. Search Engine Strategies (SES) by definition would have nothing to do with Facebook PPC but it would cover seo, sem, contextual and link building. Contextual fits because it is a service offered by search engine companies while facebook's isn't. If Google was the one offering the Facebook ppc, I doubt we would see this post framed the same way. Maybe we should just look at these conferences as opportunities to learn and talk more about online marketing specific to search engines or paid placement.



By: Strategy Node

Wed, 07 May 2008 22:29:12 +0000

I think facebook is very useful better than myspace. i feel embarrassed to sometimes open myspace in public because of the crappy advertisement. so long story short i think facebook should be in social media conferences



By: David Szetela

Mon, 05 May 2008 12:55:57 +0000

Guys - as you've both pointed out, there's an important question of whether/where Contextual Advertising Guys - as you've both pointed out, there's an important question of whether/where PPC Contextual Advertising topics "fit" in SEO/SEM conferences. I agree that strictly speaking it's not a subset of "Search" -- but it certainly is part of "Search Engine," since PPC Contextual Advertising is an important subset of the advertising platforms offered by the major search engines - Google AdWords, Yahoo! Search Marketing and (increasingly) Microsoft adCenter - as well as second-tier search engines. So logically PPC Contextual Advertising "fits" the mandate/coverage of the Search Engine Strategies conferences. One could say that it fits Search Marketing Expo as well, since the word "Engine" seems to be implicitly present after the word "Search." Another question is whether covering PPC Contextual Advertising is valuable for attendees of such conferences. I think the answer must be "yes" if one assumes coverage of PPC advertising is important - since as Danny points out above, PPC Contextual is an integral part of PPC advertising. But I can see an alternative view, too. The boundaries of PPC Contextual Advertising are already a bit fuzzy around the margins, and getting fuzzier. For example, should the Search conferences include coverage of Google TV, Audio and Print advertising? On the one hand, since advertisers manage such campaigns from "within" AdWords, and roughly speaking, there are capabilities like ROI tracking and auction-style bidding, one could argue such coverage fits any venue that covers Search Engine Marketing. On the other hand, these ad channels may be viewed as even further outside the boundaries of Search than PPC Contextual Advertising. It'll be interesting to watch how this dynamic tension shakes itself out. Will SES, SMX and other "general" conferences shrink or expand their coverage of Contextual Advertising? Will such coverage expand more "naturally) in more-vertical conferences like PPC Summit and ad:tech?



By: Marty Weintraub

Mon, 05 May 2008 12:25:43 +0000

@Danny: Sorry for the delay in posting your comment. Sometimes Akismet spam-catching is so dumb. Though you and I have spoken on a number of occasions, the conversation that night was like having egg rolls and beer with Yoda and discussing foundational theory on my favorite topic. I appreciated the time taken to discuss the subject then and it's great to continue the dialog here. First, I count at least 30 SEM conferences, shows, seminars, courses etc...that one might consider as options for furthering one's SEM education. SMX, SES, & Pubcon are the most prominent and also do a good job at content match-type discussion on panels. I spoke myself on Facebook PPC in NYC @ SES. The conference agenda that pushed my button on this one was actually PPC Summit, so I was not taking aim at you. I do note however that you're the only industry insider to take time to lend insight to our readers regarding the topic in this thread. Thank you. The dialog at the MS party in NYC was thought-provoking for me and I actually agree with you, though torn. Facebook PPC is certainly not search but skills acquired when dealing with FB PPC marketing are critical lessons for future PPC-think as apply to true search. In the early days "search" was truly search. As content network and site placement type options began to emerge they sucked, cost way too much for associated ROI and seemed unfocused. Many of us avoided Google and Yahoo's content offerings for years and it's only with groundbreaking uber-targeting like the stuff David Szetela is working on, that our clients have headed into the murky waters with a degree of confidence (see plug for David's SMX Advanced session Amazing PPC Tactics" added above). I believe that night in New York we talked about whether the discussion of Facebook PPC belongs @ a "search" or "social" conference and you did not question whether it belongs at all. You questioned where the topic belongs. Regardless, my thinking is that the art of segmenting and testing landing pages based on extremely focused interests (like playing guitar or loving a certain type of pasta sauce) is an emerging discipline which is best explored in the only true social PPC platforms of the day. I think we all know that soon enough mainstream (pull) search will involve more serious hybrid behavioral targeting attributes. My point goes more to the difference between "search" and the "search industry." You've done a nice job clarifying the distinction in this thread and it rocks to have you stop by. aimClear is covering SMX Advanced next month (and SMX local/mobile) and I'll look forward to seeing you Danny.



By: Danny Sullivan

Mon, 05 May 2008 10:10:36 +0000

Marty, contextual ads from Google are not search either. I'm pretty sure I told you this when we were talking at the Microsoft party. Search isn't that you've entered keywords into a box. Search is that you are somehow expressing an active desire to get information. You can do that by calling 411, browsing a directory as well as entering search terms. And search marketers understand the ways people search and ensure they are visible at those important places. Contextual is not search, and I've spoken on this aspect for years. People do not express an active desire when they see contextual ads. They are merely seeing stuff that may or may not be interesting to them based on what they are reading, without necessarily having a need at that moment. People do indeed confuse search and contextual. I do not, nor have I do so. Yes, I will include a session or two (at most) on contextual at search conferences because, quite frankly, it's shoved so hard at search marketers by the search companies. So often the content tends to be how it is different or how it might complement a search campaign, if you're going to run one -- since there's a good chance you might end up with a contextual campaign as well. So the set up of your article seems to be saying that contextual = search so social PPC = search. And I remain unconvinced, sorry. To the degree you can target a Facebook ad to an active desire someone is expressing, then yes, that's search. But when we talked, you weren't providing a lot of examples of that. As for the social media not being search -- hey, link building isn't search either. It's a completely separate marketing activity from search marketing. But because links are so important to search, as a search marketer, you'd better either know link building or work with someone that does. So for social media, it isn't search but is very closely related. When the number of people who tag your page on Delicious shows up in Yahoo search results, that's a search impact you'd better know about. When someone wants to damage your reputation by leveraging the authority of Digg to rank for your names, that's a search issue you'd also better know about. So there's a good reason why you see social media stuff happening in relation to search conferences, at least from me. By the way, I'm pretty sure Barbara Boser DID speak about social PPC at SMX West, on the SEO & Social Media panel. I know I specifically asked her to write an article about them for Search Engine Land last ran last year, http://searchengineland.com/071231-103853.php. There can be some search applications for those ads, and to the degree you or anyone can show them, you bet, I want that as part of a search show.