Subscribe: Comments on Grits for Breakfast: Every nasty thing you thought about Chuck Rosentha...
http://gritsforbreakfast.blogspot.com/feeds/741557276540667113/comments/default
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade A rated
Language: English
Tags:
chuck rosenthal  chuck  company  defend chuck  defend  email  mail  nasty thing  nasty  public  racist sexist  rosenthal  thing  work 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on Grits for Breakfast: Every nasty thing you thought about Chuck Rosentha...

Comments on Grits for Breakfast: Every nasty thing you thought about Chuck Rosenthal is probably true





Updated: 2017-12-14T04:29:05.209-06:00

 



I would never defend Chuck Rosenthal's professiona...

2008-05-10T03:19:00.000-05:00

I would never defend Chuck Rosenthal's professional behavior as DA myself, because he has NEVER acted in a manor that I would consider professional...

He will go down in history just a half notch down from that horrid political whore Nifong (who should be in jai)!

Rosenthal in my view has always been a lapdog for local political whoredom and a disgraceful politically correct media groveler.

A shlub who cannot be honest enough with his wife to keep his bull-parts in his pants or ask for a divorce is scum and cannot be considered a MAN!

Then to find out that he was giving excessive money to his trollop - where are the feathers and hot tar! OH!. and a rail!



The answer to your question is "no, he shouldn't r...

2008-01-10T23:43:00.000-06:00

The answer to your question is "no, he shouldn't retire now." The next 11 months won't be nearly as much fun; jury selections won't be nearly as entertaining (for the defense) without him.



Kelly Seigler? Oh no! Isn't she the one who uses J...

2008-01-10T07:57:00.000-06:00

Kelly Seigler? Oh no! Isn't she the one who uses Jailhouse Snitch Testimony to win convictions?



Hey Anonymous, you suck bringing up the 2 girls th...

2008-01-10T05:50:00.000-06:00

Hey Anonymous, you suck bringing up the 2 girls thing. I googled it to see what you were talking about, and managed to close the browser b/f I puked.



People, he's a PUBLIC official and it's misuse of ...

2008-01-09T23:06:00.000-06:00

People, he's a PUBLIC official and it's misuse of his PUBLIC email. It's just that simple. You all can go ahead and send all the crazily inappropriate email you want to at work, as far as I'm concerned, if you work for a PRIVATE company or organization, or on your PERSONAL email. Just please don't waste my tax dollar, or any minute of your tax-paid time, receiving your buddy's latest racist, sexist, disgusting, unfunny email.



Isn't his wife a federal judge in Houston?

2008-01-09T20:22:00.000-06:00

Isn't his wife a federal judge in Houston?



You can get in trouble for just sending e-mail??!!...

2008-01-09T20:12:00.000-06:00

You can get in trouble for just sending e-mail??!!

Sheeeiiiiitt............



Chuck can't plead ignorant, he's charged and convi...

2008-01-09T19:22:00.000-06:00

Chuck can't plead ignorant, he's charged and convicted many a county employee for miss-use of gov't equipment via e-mail (ie the former head of Harris Co probation). Even if you erase all your e-mail, it is still kept by the IT dept.
he has a date with a ffederal judge over erasing his e-mails after they were looking into this; isn't that evidence tampering?



Were you thinking something worse than that he's a...

2008-01-09T12:57:00.000-06:00

Were you thinking something worse than that he's a hypocrite, a racist, a misogynist, and a philanderer?



... EVERY nasty thing?!?

2008-01-09T12:30:00.000-06:00

... EVERY nasty thing?!?



For me, the distinction would be:1. He allegedly f...

2008-01-09T12:27:00.000-06:00

For me, the distinction would be:

1. He allegedly forwarded some of the offensive material as well as viewed it, according to the Houston Chronicle,

2. He used the email for inappropriate and flirtatious interactions with his secretary while married, and

3. The emails show he allegedly, improperly used county resources for his political campaign.

Those elements are what make it a story, IMO. If nothing else, it shows awfully poor judgment.

As for the emails your friends send you, the world sometimes judges all of us based on the company we keep. IMO such friends should at least be encouraged by public officials to use a private email account, if they insist on keeping such company.



I would never defend Chuck Rosenthal's professiona...

2008-01-09T12:09:00.000-06:00

I would never defend Chuck Rosenthal's professional behavior as DA. In this instance, isn't he just guilty of not having a personal e-mail account separate from his work e-mail. My friends send me--and whole list of other people--dubious e-mails with racist, sexist, and quite frankly otherwise disgusting (like 2 girls 1 cup stuff) material. I didn't request it, but it got sent to me. I do however keep business conversations limited to my work e-mail and informal and frienly conversations (the sometimes nasty e-mails) to my personal account.