Subscribe: Comments on: Grinding to a Halt
http://gruntdoc.com/2006/02/grinding-to-a-halt.html/feed
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
added disclaimer  don  emotional distress  emotional  fault  injury  lawyer  line  matt  millions  physical injury  physical  read  talk 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: Grinding to a Halt

Comments on: Grinding to a Halt



Ramblings of an Emergency Physician in Texas



Last Build Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2017 13:18:31 +0000

 



By: That Girl

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:42:14 +0000

Wow, I thought it was over until I checked back. It probably is the nurse's fault (if any fault) but I really dont know how it works. That was kind of my point. Who is responsible? I dont know, and frankly, Im more interested in fixing the problem rather than blaming someone. My son was diagnosed with a heart defect that would (in his case) leave very little margin for survival after birth. I read up on everything and came back to the doctor to tell him I had decided to go through with the pregnancy. I had read about many successful treatments and read about many thriving children. He said to me "Of course, you're not going to hear the unsuccesful stories." I took his point, and I was just trying to make the point that doctors never hear about people like me - who dont know (until you guys provided me with several answers) what to do to get an answer out of the hospital staff and are unwilling to sue as a reflex. We exist. Some of us get bad care. I was only trying to posit to a weary ER doc that there are plenty of us who are unlike the bad people he sees - just as I dont automatically assume that the ER doc Im going to see is stupid/negligent just because one was in the past. I would LOVE to have a medical review board but practically, for every person like me who may just want "Im sorry I screwed up. Ill be a lot more observant/change my habits so I get more sleep" there is someone who thinks that a reasonable accident should probide them with enough money for life. Or even the understandable if illogical view that someone must be to blame for everything and no margin for error exists anywhere. Once again, thanks to all the ER docs! And thanks for the explanation of the test-after-I-leave thing, Good to know. And fyi, i do understand why viruses and antibiotics dont mix I just didnt understand the connection since no one has ever called me to follow up from an ER.



By: difficult patient

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:15:03 +0000

I'm a patient, but I couldn't agree with you more. There are many areas in which patients could use more information . . .cost is only one of them.



By: L

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:43:54 +0000

I just read DS's comment about suing the nurse - that's exactly what I was thinking. I thought IV's were under the nurse's domain. Aren't nurses supposed to be monitoring and watching for infiltration?



By: L

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:22:27 +0000

That Girl, Jerry is absolutely 100% correct about the fact that once attorneys are involved nobody is going to talk to you. The best advice I have is get all your ducks in a row. Get a copy of the medical records, sooner rather than later. Read them closely. Then, go and talk to somebody high up in the administration. We didn't make an appointment. We showed up at the administrator's office. He was in a meeting for 2 hours. And we waited for 2 hours. Then we presented the records to him and asked what the hell was going on. We asked, How do you have a physician employed in your hospital who tells a ninety year old man he is going to have to "find a way home," after he has fractured his hip in 3 places (the radiologist read it the next morning), and then give him no pain medication. My grandfather actually had to call his own ambulance to take him back home, because he couldn't walk. If you think that administrator wasn't squirming. He stammered and stuttered. We were pissed. THe hospital will do an investigation, and at least at the hospital my loved one was at we were told we would be notified of the results of that investigation. There's always the option of suing, but that is a very long arduous process I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy. If there's any other route, I would say take that one. If you don't get the answers from the hospital, then there's also the option of filing a complaint with the dept of health or the Board, they will do an investigation, also.



By: Matt

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:19:21 +0000

"I won't waste time looking, but to parce things like a lawyer for you. I never said "got", I said "claimed". I never said "without physical injury", you added that disclaimer as well." Oh, so what's important is not the actual result, but the claim. I see. And actually, what you originally asked for was to be compensated for the "emotional stress" of going through trial and implied that people got millions for similar claims. Presumably, that does not include a physical injury. In essence, you were just spouting off nonsense. " READ FOR COMPREHENSION (your favorite line). I NEVER said that was ok. Don't put words in my mouth. That is why I say find a new pseudonym and start over." I hope you take your own advice because it's pretty clear you aren't reading what you write. You're a nice kid, Jerry, but stay away from the hysterical rantings of the alleged ills of medical malpractice. You're smarter than that, I'm sure. What's amazing about these 100 posts is that, like most of the lobbying efforts and money spent by doctors, it's about something that will ultimately effect them very little. Meanwhile, the bigger issues cruise right on by.



By: jerry

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:00:36 +0000

"So I take it you couldn't cite such a case. I'll try again. Please list a med mal case where a victim got millions in damage for purely "emotional distress" unaccompanied by physical injury." I won't waste time looking, but to parce things like a lawyer for you. I never said "got", I said "claimed". I never said "without physical injury", you added that disclaimer as well. "What's sad is that you think it's perfectly fine that her own physician won't even speak to her." This is why you have no credibility as a troller. READ FOR COMPREHENSION (your favorite line). I NEVER said that was ok. Don't put words in my mouth. That is why I say find a new pseudonym and start over. Sheesh, this is so childish, but CONGRATULATIONS Gruntdoc, you got 100 comments from your original rant.



By: Matt

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:51:12 +0000

"C'mon Matt, even with your last added disclaimer just use google for lots of fun and interesting reading." So I take it you couldn't cite such a case. I'll try again. Please list a med mal case where a victim got millions in damage for purely "emotional distress" unaccompanied by physical injury. "You think yourself way too important. Nothing will misconstrue the truth from both sides once lawyers are involved." Actually, I don't think I'm all that necessary at all. What's sad is that you think it's perfectly fine that her own physician won't even speak to her, and now she should have to write a letter to the administrator. Why would you testifying under oath make the truth misconstrued? Would you lie? I'm sorry you didn't get the Bush reference. It's an analogy, but if you don't have the context for it, it's understandable. What's funny is that if you read your posts, "it's not my fault" seems to be your company line. I'm not too worried about the assessment of you and ds on my credibility. You two may be OK physicians, but beyond that your understanding of most other things appears to be painfully lacking. Watch out for that train!



By: jerry

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:20:13 +0000

"Name one where millions were awarded for "emotional distress" without physical injury" C'mon Matt, even with your last added disclaimer just use google for lots of fun and interesting reading. "She can't get an answer NOW, and she hasn't hired a lawyer." A good way NOT to get an answer is to get a lawyer involved, because then any discussion or apology will be construed as an admission of guilt and used against you in the courtroom. Gruntdoc and the previous posters are correct, TRY writing a letter or talking to administration first. You think yourself way too important. Nothing will misconstrue the truth from both sides once lawyers are involved. In 3 frivolous suits filed against me the first thing I ever heard from the plaintiff was a letter from an attorney. I would be happy to talk with a patient or family but you have to come to me about it. I see 25-30 patients a shift, I don't follow everyone home or know what happened. Now the decedant in these lawsuits will suffer through years of lawyer agony only to learn that death happens while keeping lawyers employed on both sides wasting money. "You guys are almost Bushian in your willingness to blame literally everything wrong on others, and claim that you haven't made a single mistake." Huh? I'm no bush fan and disdain politics in general, but what does Bush have to do with it? unless you want to blame him for everything like the liberal left. "Its not my fault" has always been the liberal battlecry. DS is right, you really have lost all credibility. Find a new pseudonym and start over.



By: ds

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:20:47 +0000

CJD, are you really a graduate of an accredited law school? I can poke holes in every line of your last statement, but I'm not even going to bother. Just for example line 2 you added your own unattached claim to disprove line 1. Physical Injury? I know we're Doctors, but we understand logic. You need some work dude.



By: Matt

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:07:11 +0000

"And yes, there have been millions awarded for "emotional distress" in court cases." Name one where millions were awarded for "emotional distress" without physical injury. "The legal system sets the playing rules so what is your profession going to do about it? Trial lawyers have too much invested interest in keeping things the way they are." Yes, it's all the lawyer's fault that physicians won't take the time to sit down with the patients and explain what happen. Is there nothing wrong with the way physicians go about their business? Is there no room for improvement? You guys are almost Bushian in your willingness to blame literally everything wrong on others, and claim that you haven't made a single mistake. Didn't you read her post? She can't get an answer NOW, and she hasn't hired a lawyer. And its your insurer who is telling you not to talk to the patient, not their lawyer. Again, settlement offers are not admissable. If you don't talk to your patient because your insurer tells you not to, that's no one else's fault.