Subscribe: Comments for Muslihoon
http://muslihoon.wordpress.com/comments/feed/
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
cancer  circumcision  comment  female circumcision  hindu  islam  muslim  muslims  oral cancer  oral  people  prophet  sex  taj mahal  temple 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments for Muslihoon

Comments for Muslihoon



مصلحون: وتعرفون الحق والحق يحرركم



Last Build Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:46:22 +0000

 



Comment on A startling and uncomfortable discovery in Islamic shariah by Ahmed

Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:46:22 +0000

An excellent work on hoodectomy (Islamic female circumcision) is available at http://www.umatia.org/2011/Safe%20Female%20circumcision.doc



Comment on Two important effects of the invasion of Iraq by Jon Adams

Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:05:01 +0000

Except that if the crown prince read much of financial journals he would know that US influence in the world is waning as a result. US wars in the past decade have rung up a $4 trillion bill. The US economy collapsed, and the war bill didn't help.



Comment on The root of problems from Islam is Islam itself by johnny b

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:20:19 +0000

perhaps you should learn something about the life of the Prophet(SAW).you are ignorant and know nothing about islam.



Comment on The root of problems from Islam is Islam itself by johnny b

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:56:48 +0000

hi Mr Manas.you said that you are a Hindu from India.so you probably would have heard about the taj mahal,the lal qila,the tomb of akbr at sikandra,the golden temple............the taj mahal is the symbol of india around the globe.the government makes half of its money of tourism from this structure.and I tell you one thing more,that taj mahal is a masjid that was made by shah jahan(whom you consider as a muslim invader who destroyed india)and that it was a makbara(muslim tomb).he made these glorious monuments which none of your so called secularists could not make.and even then you consider mughals as 'invaders'.there are over 10,000 mughal monuments across the country which are far greater in number than any of your 'seculars' built for this country.you said that muslim 'invaders' killed anyone who refused to accept islam.then tell me who built the golden temple,the lotus temple,the jwala mukhi temple and many more.you would probably know what kind of act hindu fundamentalists did when they destroyed the Babri Masjid and butchered 12,000 muslims in gujarat in 2002.by the way can you tell me the name of any hindu leader that is secular in nature.your society is far more divided and biased than that of the muslims.the brahmins,rajputs,vaishyas and the shudras,the shudras,nowadays known as 'dalits' were considered untouchables by your religion.the practice of sati,the inhumane crimes done against them give an insight on how the hindu fundamentalists conducted barbaric and inhuman acts.I do not want to go any deeper and tell you more.Perhaps you wold have understood by now.Prophet(SAW) is the best example of islam and you should first learn about his life rather than these leaders.the meaning of the word islam is itself 'peace'.so first learn about it and then say anything.



Comment on The root of problems from Islam is Islam itself by Anonymous

Sun, 26 Jun 2011 14:54:55 +0000

hi Mr Manas.you said that you are a Hindu from India.so you probably would have heard about the taj mahal,the lal qila,the tomb of akbr at sikandra,the golden temple............the taj mahal is the symbol of india around the globe.the government makes half of its money of tourism from this structure.and I tell you one thing more,that taj mahal is a masjid that was made by shah jahan(whom you consider as a muslim invader who destroyed india)and that it was a makbara(muslim tomb).he made these glorious monuments which none of your so called secularists could not make.and even then you consider mughals as 'invaders'.there are over 10,000 mughal monuments across the country which are far greater in number than any of your 'seculars' built for this country.you said that muslim 'invaders' killed anyone who refused to accept islam.then tell me who built the golden temple,the lotus temple,the jwala mukhi temple and many more.you would probably know what kind of act hindu fundamentalists did when they destroyed the Babri Masjid and butchered 12,000 muslims in gujarat in 2002.by the way can you tell me the name of any hindu leader that is secular in nature.your society is far more divided and biased than that of the muslims.the brahmins,rajputs,vaishyas and the shudras,the shudras,nowadays known as 'dalits' were considered untouchables by your religion.the practice of sati,the inhumane crimes done against them give an insight on how the hindu fundamentalists conducted barbaric and inhuman acts.I do not want to go any deeper and tell you more.Perhaps you wold have understood by now.Prophet(SAW) is the best example of islam and you should first learn about his life rather than these leaders.the meaning of the word islam is itself 'peace'.so first learn about it and then say anything.



Comment on Some thoughts on homosexuality in the Muslim world by Bluegameroyon

Tue, 10 May 2011 19:48:56 +0000

"This is an issue that is perplexing to a very large degree." sure. but that's because some people are idiots. they actually let primitive sheets of paper do the thinking for them. Homosexuals, heterosexuals, trans-gendered, bisexuals- they are all still human! people shouldn't tell humans to stop loving each other or to not have sex or just infringe on their lives and abilities to do things as people. that's very obvious. also, Account, you are wrong. Homosexuality is natural. it's well-documented in several species in the wilderness and in zoos. even though it was only online, i have read of several instances of homosexuals who have posted saying that they just don't feel attracted to the opposite sex. the way they look at people of the same sex is the way heterosexuals look at people of the opposite sex. "survival of the fittest" do you know what you're talking about? homosexual animals can actually be beneficial to a species. i've read this one article a few months ago that described these two homosexual penguins that reared in an abandoned penguin chick. if the penguin chick was left alone, it would have probably died. however, just for the sake of argument, if homosexuality is unnatural (which, i know, it isn't) so what? let homosexuals hang around however they like. as long as they're not hurting anyone, why should we care who they have sex with?



Comment on About Jihad, Section 4 of Part I: Types of Engagement in Jihad by Forbidden Fruit

Mon, 09 May 2011 14:43:02 +0000

Jihad is a hugely misunderstood practice first by the muslims themselves and then by the rest of the world. But let me add, it's only those muslims who do not make any effort to read up on their own. They only rely on what they are told.



Comment on What if Mecca were destroyed? Answer to max’s question. by mailme

Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:01:02 +0000

Hu in the western country all infomation news media or internet be control by the goverment.they all read lies news that have been make for them (stupid people) not the true news (smart people) like we all read.Some of them that post stupid comment like make pizza mac donald bla bla anything not really know how stupid of them.



Comment on What if Mecca were destroyed? Answer to max’s question. by replay

Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:49:33 +0000

how about your all fucking maniac christian go boom mecca use nuke or whatever weapon you got that you so pround of see what will happen and then we will see if you all can survive for 1 day or not you all who love world war 3 go fucking die first.!



Comment on Pakistan’s military: an issue of ability and willingness by Anonymous

Thu, 28 Apr 2011 08:32:05 +0000

fuck u and ur analysis bastard



Comment on John Gebhardt and little Iraqi girl by Nathalie

Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:29:08 +0000

What a beautiful picture. This picture just broke my heart. I just saw it on Facebook on my friend's wall who is French also. I am French and married to a US Citizen who is a veteran. I don't care about all the argument going on.... I just care about this BEAUTIFUL picture. Very well done John and thank you for just being a beautiful human being !!!!



Comment on John Gebhardt and little Iraqi girl by Anonymous

Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:28:06 +0000

What a beautiful picture. This picture just broke my heart. I just saw it on Facebook on my friend's wall who is French also. I am French and married to a US Citizen who is a veteran. I don't care about all the argument going on.... I just care about this BEAUTIFUL picture. Very well done John and thank you for just being a beautiful human being !!!!



Comment on What if Mecca were destroyed? Answer to max’s question. by Exterminator

Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:25:02 +0000

You people are scum, a scourge, a threat to our future! I always said that Adolf Hitler didn't sought out the right targets for the final solution.. He should have exterminated muslims instead of Jews! I hope Ahmadinedjad gets his Nuke, and fuck Israel over, that way, WW3 would be declared on the parasitic animals that you are, and clean the world from your presence in Nuclear Fire. You people say that we should be tolerant with you, and yet you are the most intolerant people around. You should all DIE for us to be finally at peace! Zieg Heil






Comment on The use and role of the UNO by Anonymous

Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:57:50 +0000

uno is good but we are not good



Comment on A startling and uncomfortable discovery in Islamic shariah by Ahmed

Mon, 07 Mar 2011 04:23:12 +0000

Here’s another interesting news item that supports the need for a hoodectomy (Islamic female circumcision): Oral sex linked to cancer risk US scientists said Sunday there is strong evidence linking oral sex to cancer, and urged more study of how human papillomaviruses may be to blame for a rise in oral cancer among white men. In the United States, oral cancer due to HPV infection is now more common than oral cancer from tobacco use, which remains the leading cause of such cancers in the rest of the world. Researchers have found a 225-percent increase in oral cancer cases in the United States from 1974 to 2007, mainly among white men, said Maura Gillison of Ohio State University. "The rise in oral cancer in the US is predominantly among young white males and we do not know the answer as to why." It is obvious that the only way men can acquire the HPV virus is through the oral stimulation of one’s partner’s clitoris which allows the virus to enter the mouth. The virus no doubt is harboured in the prepuce of the clitoris just as it has been found that HPV also resides in the foreskins of males, through the transmission of which cervical cancer occurs in females. Thus a hoodectomy could, by removing the area which habours the virus, significantly reduce or eliminate the risk of women transmitting the virus to their male partners.



Comment on John Gebhardt and little Iraqi girl by Fred

Sat, 05 Mar 2011 04:28:51 +0000

This picture now circulates elsewhere on the web with John Gebhardt's name but with the tag that it was taken in Afghanistan. Google John Gebhardt Afghanistan.



Comment on And now for something different: Mandarin by orientaldiamond

Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:09:10 +0000

"Knapp und kurz" Basically, I agree with you. Except one part. "Once the tones are perfected..." Don't know about you, but for me it's the most difficult part. I think, if your tones are not good enough, the only thing can save you is your vocabulary. If Chinese don't understand one word, you can use some synonyms. And also learning dialects is very important. At least several sentences...



Comment on ‘Awrah, aurat: of women in Arabic in Urdu by nisa

Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:55:21 +0000

Well, 'awrah' does not refer t cover parts of our body only but it also mean that we are taking care of our dignity. Something that is so precious is not for display but it is for us to keep. As long as our 'awrah' is safe in our care, it make our dignity stays high and gain respect from others...



Comment on A startling and uncomfortable discovery in Islamic shariah by Ahmed

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:51:46 +0000

Female Circumcision is one of the most misunderstood practices of Islam. Here’s an excellent article showing that it is not the kind of mutilation it is commonly believed to be and that is the same as hoodectomy which western women are increasingly choosing to undergo for better genital hygiene and an enhanced sex life : There exist many ahadith or sayings of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) to show the important place, circumcision, whether of males or females, occupies in Islam. Among these traditions is the one where the Prophet is reported to have declared circumcision (khitan) to be sunnat for men and ennobling for women (Baihaqi). He is also known to have declared that the bath (following sexual intercourse without which no prayer is valid) becomes obligatory when both the circumcised parts meet (Tirmidhi). The fact that the Prophet defined sexual intercourse as the meeting of the male and female circumcised parts (khitanul khitan or khitanain) when stressing on the need for the obligatory post-coital bath could be taken as pre-supposing or indicative of the obligatory nature of circumcision in the case of both males and females. Stronger still is his statement classing circumcision (khitan) as one of the acts characteristic of the fitra or God-given nature (Or in other words, Divinely-inspired natural inclinations of humans) such as the shaving of pubic hair, removing the hair of the armpits and the paring of nails (Bukhari) which again shows its strongly emphasized if not obligatory character in the case of both males and females. Muslim scholars are of the view that acts constituting fitra which the Prophet expected Muslims to follow are to be included in the category of wajib or obligatory. That the early Muslims regarded female circumcision as obligatory even for those Muslims who embraced Islam later in life is suggested by a tradition occurring in the Adab al Mufrad of Bukhari where Umm Al Muhajir is reported to have said: “I was captured with some girls from Byzantium. (Caliph) Uthman offered us Islam, but only myself and one other girl accepted Islam. Uthman said: ‘Go and circumcise them and purify them.’” More recently, we had Sheikh Jadul Haqq, the distinguished head of Al Azhar declaring both male and female circumcision to be obligatory religious duties (Khitan Al Banat in Fatawa Al-Islamiyyah. 1983). The fatwa by his successor Tantawi who opposed the practice cannot be taken seriously as we all know that he has pronounced a number of unislamic fatwas such as declaring bank interest halal and questioning the obligation of women wearing headscarves. At the same time, however, what is required in Islam, is the removal of only the prepuce of the clitoris, and not the clitoris itself as is widely believed. The Prophet is reported to have told Umm Atiyyah, a lady who circumcised girls in Medina: “When you circumcise, cut plainly and do not cut severely, for it is beauty for the face and desirable for the husband” (idha khafadti fa ashimmi wa la tanhaki fa innahu ashraq li’l wajh wa ahza ind al zawj) (Abu Dawud, Al Awsat of Tabarani and Tarikh Baghdad of Al Baghdadi). This hadith clearly explains the procedure to be followed in the circumcision of girls. The words: “Cut plainly and do not cut severely” (ashimmi wa la tanhaki) is to be understood in the sense of removing the skin covering the clitoris, and not the clitoris. The expression “It is beauty (more properly brightness or radiance) for the face” (ashraq li’l wajh) is further proo[...]