Subscribe: Comments on: Charles F. Shaw Winery, Chardonnay 2006
http://winecast.net/2007/04/01/charles-f-shaw-winery-chardonnay-2006/feed/
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
april fools  april  charles shaw  charles  chuck  elliott  fools  joke  kind  shaw  sonadora  tim elliott  tim  wine  winery  year 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: Comments on: Charles F. Shaw Winery, Chardonnay 2006

Comments on: Charles F. Shaw Winery, Chardonnay 2006





Last Build Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 23:49:00 +0000

 



By: Tim Elliott

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:23:00 +0000

Um, this post was an April Food's joke and nearly all fabricated. Some others didn't get the joke so I don't do these anymore. If you want to critique something serious on the subject, please review my more recent post here: http://winecast.net/2012/02/04/charles-shaw-what-a-long-strange-trip-its-been/



By: Htelucia

Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:20:00 +0000

I have no idea who Tim Elliott is, but have just read his 2007 post on Charles F. Shaw. Where he get his misinformation is beyond me but after reading this I would never put an iota of credibility in any of his writings. Just to start, my former husband was not from Chicago, was never a dentist nor any kind of doctor.  We did not sell the winery property to Charles Krug and I could go on and on with the absurd fabrications this Tim Elliott has dreamed up.  What a nutcase.  Lucy Clark Shaw  (former wife of Charles F. Shaw)



By: Tom

Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:33:52 +0000

Charles Shaw wine has become an institution in Arizona and California. Not just because of the low price, but because of the pleasing taste and aroma of pepper and berries. It has become very popular with the older adults who like to have parties. No one seems to turn down a glass of Charles Shaw. Some don't even know what the label is and they always ask for more!



By: Arthur

Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:51:41 +0000

Tim, You might actually try the 2006 Two-Buck-Chuck Chard and see how close to the 92-94 point score you come.



By: Tim

Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:31:02 +0000

Not to worry, nearly everyone else thought this was legit, as well. In retrospect, I could have just written a straight post about Alder joining the Wine Spectator but he posted while I was in the middle of cooking up my false tasting note... I'll try harder next year ;-)



By: Sonadora

Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:19:02 +0000

Ah, missed the joke. A little slow on the uptake first thing in the morning!



By: Tim

Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:41:41 +0000

Sonadora, Happy April ;-) I took the seeds of truth and took it into absurd but still somewhat believable territory for my April Fools joke. Not too many people got it, however. Oh well, there's always next year. The best wine blogger April Fools post was from Alder, as usual...



By: Sonadora

Mon, 02 Apr 2007 13:29:50 +0000

Interesting. I must admit when I first saw your title I thought you were going to review a bottle of $2 Chuck. Though I doubt any of the consumers of the new Charles Shaw wines will confuse it with a bottle of the $2 kind....the price alone should be enough!