Subscribe: Photo Business News & Forum
Preview: Photo Business News & Forum

Photo Business News & Forum

Occasional Musings and News About the Business of Being a Photographer

Updated: 2018-02-22T14:44:25.645-05:00


VIDEO: Getty Images Losing Ground in Mid-Stock Business as CEO Steps Down


The US Copyright Office for months have been working behind the scenes to codify new rules for group registrations of photographs, and they were released last week. In short, they are bad news for photographers, with very little good news.For almost a decade, we have been registering, monthly, several thousand of our images in a single registration, for one registration fee. Some times, these were less than a thousand, and sometimes they were more than 5,000 images.   Here is the video that details how we have been doing them: allow="autoplay; encrypted-media" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="255" src="" width="430"> In less than a month, the limit is going to be 750 images, TOTAL, on a single registration. This means that a group registration of 5,500 images that I could previously register for $55 using the online eCO, will now cost me $520, or almost a ten-fold increase. (Source: Library of Congress fees).It is disturbing that there is little extra cost (that is, a few additional sheets of certificate paper) for a 5,500 image registration than for a 750 image registration, so it makes no sense as to why this change has occurred. While the new rules are the same for both a group registration of published photographs (GRPPH) and a group of unpublished photographs (GRUPH), this doesn't alleviate how much more work it is going to be for photographers, and how much more expensive it is.Here are the new requirements:Every image must be in a separate document in list form, and this list is not created until you have submitted your registration, and receive a case number from the eCOPhotos can only be JPEG, TIF, and GIF, and all should be in a .ZIP file, and the total size of the file must be 500MB or lessYou'll still page the $55 fee, but the link above lists a $65 fee now as wellYou can no longer use a paper registration, it's online onlyThe registration requires that you're the only authorEvery image must have it's own title, as we recommend in the video above, not just a single titlethe entire group must also have a title, also as we recommend in the above video The document has to list in a very specific manner, the title of the work, the filename of the work as stored in the ZIP file, and the date of first publication.  So, a work I created today at the US Capitol covering the reopening of the government would be:TITLE: 20180122_CongressPressConf0987  FILE: 20180122_CongressPressConf0987.JPG  DATE: 01/22/2018While this is easily automatable, it is an additional steps that adds to the hassle.Then, the required attached document, in list form, using Excel, would something be named something like:A group of published photographs by John Harrington CaseNo000000.xlsThen title of the work would be:"A group of published photographs by John Harrington"On the plus side, the Copyright Office has specified that now it is no longer a question as to whether or not the individual images registered as a part of a group registration are covered individually or not, they are now. So if someone were to say you were entitled to only a single statutory award of up to $150,000 if someone infringes on 5 images that all were in a single registration, your maximum statutory award would be $150k x 5, or $750,000. Whereas now,  That argument now is supposedly laid to rest. That is, until a court case challenges it. Another significant improvement to the regulations is that the photographers who use assistants or other photographers to work under them on a work-made-for-hire basis can now register multiple photographers all on the same registration for one fee, provided that the legal author of all the photographs is the same, as it is when second shooters work on a work-made-for-hire basis (with the necessary contract signed beforehand). Previously one would have to file a separate registration for photographs made by each additional photographer even if  they were working on a WMFH basis.Here is the final rule (LINK): After soliciting comments in late 201[...]