Subscribe: burn the witches : It's as bad as LJ...
http://burnthewitches.blogspot.com/feeds/3002986884380759146/comments/default
Added By: Feedage Forager Feedage Grade B rated
Language: English
Tags:
bollocks divide  daily mail  daily  feck  goddam blogger  heh someone  hugpats love  mail utterances  mothering  omega  rant  thing  women 
Rate this Feed
Rate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feedRate this feed
Rate this feed 1 starRate this feed 2 starRate this feed 3 starRate this feed 4 starRate this feed 5 star

Comments (0)

Feed Details and Statistics Feed Statistics
Preview: burn the witches : It's as bad as LJ...

Comments on burn the witches: It's as bad as LJ...





Updated: 2017-10-29T00:52:45.870+01:00

 



What a bunch of bollocks. Divide and conquer, it's...

2007-06-05T03:56:00.000+01:00

What a bunch of bollocks. Divide and conquer, it's the Daily Mail way!

Thene - I was reading at 4, too. Apparently I am supposed to consider this child abuse on my mother's part.

Funny how Dad's not even mentioned.



and yeah, goddam fucking blogger.

2007-05-31T17:54:00.001+01:00

and yeah, goddam fucking blogger.



Heh, someone already coined the "omega women" conc...

2007-05-31T17:54:00.000+01:00

Heh, someone already coined the "omega women" concept: (pals o' mine, plug!)



;__;! *hugpats* I would love to have seen that r...

2007-05-30T15:37:00.000+01:00

;__;! *hugpats* I would love to have seen that rant, and hope you get back to it at some point, if only in brief. That article is disgusting in many ways, not least the assumption that women outside of income class A/B don't exist and certainly don't have babies; plus I'm surprised at how willing the far-right media is to giving me opportunities to revel in my freak status lately. Maybe I usually just blank these things out.

(When I was four, reading was my favourite thing in the whole wide world, except maybe for playing at dressing-up. hmph to the daily male!)



Not as nutty as some Daily Mail utterances, althou...

2007-05-30T15:21:00.000+01:00

Not as nutty as some Daily Mail utterances, although I do have a few rant-like thoughts and one or two Random Ideas of No Consequence.

First, a RIoNC: better marketing-wise would be to call it "omega-mothering" rather than "beta-mothering", because everyone knows omega is good (like omega-3, omega factor, etc) and it's the opposite end of the Greek alphabet, thus emphasising the difference!

Ranty thoughts: why do we have to classify motherhood and the ways in which it's done? For sure identify when there's a common dysfunctional relationship going on (which seems to be the "alpha-mother" thing) but why do you need to say a person is an "either-or" - what the feck's wrong with just getting on with it?

The beta-mother thang looks like it's just another form of social one-upmanship, a display thing rather than a care thing, and anyway - who the feck gives a feck about the fecking middle-class pompous pricks who are able to worry about alpha- or beta- or whatever mothering anyway? Most mothers, I imagine, have a big enough challenge with mothering anyway, and really, fashonable theories of this or that aren't relevant to them. And that's just this country, what about Africa, Asia, and the rest of the world?

***

Go on, how much of that was likely to be in your rant?