Comments for CCLA Rights Watch ... La veille sur les droits et libertés

Comment on Canadian Music Industry asks Parliament to impose a levy on MP3 players by blouson top

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:46:12 +0000

These are in fact awesome YouTube video lessons, its my good luck to go to see this web page and finding these cool YouTube video lessons.

Comment on Op-Ed: Transgender Rights Bill by LOVE_Passionate

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:28:35 +0000

You secured the loan with your car. If you don't pay the loan, you forfeit your car.

Comment on Intellectually challenged teen turned away as blood donor by Eric Brousseau, McGill University

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:28:15 +0000

This is awful. I hope the publicity this article generates will force Canadian Blood Services to reverse course soon!

Comment on New legislation that will impact online privacy to be introduced by PL

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:52:47 +0000

If they go ahead with this proposed legislation it will be a giant step toward a police state where the government watches everything we do. This must be stopped.

Comment on Quand manifestation étudiante et brutalité policière vont de pairs by James

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:08:13 +0000

Gang de pouilleux de communistes de colisses! Brutalité policière? A cause d'un coup de poing? Va donc voir en Russie, l'intello, d'la VRAIE brutalité policière! Eux-autres, 'y niaisent pas avec la puck! Avec le gouvernement conservateur MAJORITAIRE qu'on a, cré-moé, Harper va pas endurer d'l'instabilité sociale et politique longtemps dans la "belle province"! Changez votre attitude VITE et TROUVEZ-VOUS UNE JOB, CRISSE!!!!!

Comment on New legislation that will impact online privacy to be introduced by Aylin Berberian

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:56:25 +0000

In my opinion, if the conservatives go thru with their plans and if the police are allowed to actually access someone's computer or cell from their internet provider etc this will obviously be considered as a breach of privacy. There are many other ways to actually identify a person or a criminal than to access their privacy. I think that such an action is a breach to the "expectative de vie privée" basically every person expects that no one actually accesses their private life such as computer, cell phone etc. Privacy is also something that the Charter of Canada defends as a right so if it is a must to breach someone's privacy, at least do it on a judge's permission therefore get a Warrant to do so. I also think that this would lead to an abusive usage of private information about other people. Any police officer could actually filter your private life if they go ahead with what they are planning.

Comment on Op-Ed: Transgender Rights Bill by OFFICIALCJAY205

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:56:56 +0000

One? day the Feds will come for you.

Comment on New legislation that will impact online privacy to be introduced by 2 Cents

Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:29:44 +0000

People on front line act differently than those behind Policy making desks. Police join the system to protect the public which will likely make Officers question their own morals. This causing them to supply information illegally due to legitimate feelings of assisting the public sharing protected privacy information. People should feel able to announce their personal feelings/opinions without it affecting their personal/business profile in public. Not as much truth will be shared amongst everyone if each person's identity is blatently available to those who want it. Police are people. What if your friend knew an Officer who extracted data about you that hurt your personal relationship with them or put your business into bankruptcy? Is it an open market on information by any officer? Should there not be a system/policies in which an Officer can extract this information? A department within the detachment that must be consulted with before information is requested or possibly released. A way to ensure information is not available without proper need and that the officers name and purpose of that information is recorded for all reasons. An archive available to all including Officer that retrieved information, why it was retrieved, and an immediate email sent to the person about why their personal information was searched might prevent further crime by that person reducing cost to society. When it comes to personal information it should never be released without policies/legislation being followed. Permission to ensure proper release of information is the way to be, not at the individual desires of an individual officer. Should someone need a PI licence to stalk, monitor, take pictures of, tap into phone lines, record the daily life of someone? Should it be illegal to tap into Police communications? Should someone have their basic rights [not involved with criminal activity] respected? What is currently wrong with the warrant system? How long does it take to have a warrant issued and the information needed in the hands of those who asked for it? Do you believe that if Police want information immediately about something that it is not already available to them?

Comment on Windsor police aiming to change the culture of the force by RickRod

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:39:50 +0000

DeJong is already trying to get away from having to implement any of these changes. He says that the problems are isolated and not severe--I know that he can't really believe this, it just reeks of cynicism. What bothers me, is that no officer will step forward and say that it is wrong to beat and then extort an innocent man. Until at least one Windsor officer stands up for real justice, I believe them all to be corrupt. I hope that their attitude of the being above the law is considered during their contract talks! What an embarrassment for officers everywhere!

Comment on Supreme Court of Canada to consider rights of common-law spouses by Randall

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:53:15 +0000

Every consenting adult should have the right to determine the nature of their own personal and romantic relationships without the intervention of the government or anyone else, and that naturally includes deciding whether or not they are married or single or something in between. It is not up to the government or anyone else to impose their views on us legally with respect to our individual decisions in these matters. Only when two people both agree that they are legally married should any laws pertaining to such a relationship apply. Otherwise it should simply be none of the government's or anyone else's business. As for the care of the children, there are already very strict and enforced laws on child support. As for what either party "gives up" to raise children, what if there are no children? Then what? Also how do we put a value on the relationship that someone lucky enough to be a stay at home parent has with their children? A stay at home parent is no victim. Plus many parents both work and share the responsibilities as well. For all these reasons, particularly the protection of our inalienable right to determine the nature of our own personal and romantic relationships, the government and the legal system should simply butt out.

Comments (0) - Read and Add your own Comments